Ground loops and star wiring was Re: power supply
Posted by
ballendo
on 2002-02-04 07:52:15 UTC
Hello,
Ground has two purposes: Providing a "reference" for the voltage, and
providing a "safe" return path for electrons.
So I will call the first "signal" ground, and the second "safety"
ground(earth). To provide the necessary safety, they must be
connected.
BUT, they "should" only be connected at ONE point, or all sorts of
problems can occur. This group of problems falls under the heading
of "ground loops". This happens because all wires (above absolute
zero<G>) have resistance and inductance. What this means is that if
you connect these two types of "ground" "here and there", these
resistances and inductances will ensure that unwanted voltage is
present in varying degrees at various parts of the system. These
varying "unwanted" voltages are called ground loops. (because your
connections have made a path -a loop- for electrons to travel, when
they are "supposed" to only be "going" one direction...
The "one-point" grounding (called "star" wiring) minimises this. This
is why stepper drivers are all fed INDEPENDANTLY from the power
supply, and not "daisy-chained". (you see the same thing with your
drive connectors in your PC) So, first you bring all the SIGNAL
grounds (of each voltage) to a SINGLE point. This kinda looks like a
star, the wires radiate out from this central point to the various
devices at that voltage. Next you bring all these "starred" SIGNAL
grounds to a SINGLE point. Now you do the same thing with
your "safety" grounds. And FINALLY, you connect the signal and safety
grounds together at one point.
This is the ideal situation, and sometimes you simply cannot do it
(multiple enclosures), but the closer you can keep to this "ideal",
the better.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
P.S. While we're here, the "shields" of cables should only be
connected to ground at ONE end, preferably closest to the power
supply. Again not always possible, but try.
P.P.S. There are more than a few electrical devices "out there" that
DON'T connect signal ground and safety ground. In these cases, other
means have been used to provide the needed safety.
Ground has two purposes: Providing a "reference" for the voltage, and
providing a "safe" return path for electrons.
So I will call the first "signal" ground, and the second "safety"
ground(earth). To provide the necessary safety, they must be
connected.
BUT, they "should" only be connected at ONE point, or all sorts of
problems can occur. This group of problems falls under the heading
of "ground loops". This happens because all wires (above absolute
zero<G>) have resistance and inductance. What this means is that if
you connect these two types of "ground" "here and there", these
resistances and inductances will ensure that unwanted voltage is
present in varying degrees at various parts of the system. These
varying "unwanted" voltages are called ground loops. (because your
connections have made a path -a loop- for electrons to travel, when
they are "supposed" to only be "going" one direction...
The "one-point" grounding (called "star" wiring) minimises this. This
is why stepper drivers are all fed INDEPENDANTLY from the power
supply, and not "daisy-chained". (you see the same thing with your
drive connectors in your PC) So, first you bring all the SIGNAL
grounds (of each voltage) to a SINGLE point. This kinda looks like a
star, the wires radiate out from this central point to the various
devices at that voltage. Next you bring all these "starred" SIGNAL
grounds to a SINGLE point. Now you do the same thing with
your "safety" grounds. And FINALLY, you connect the signal and safety
grounds together at one point.
This is the ideal situation, and sometimes you simply cannot do it
(multiple enclosures), but the closer you can keep to this "ideal",
the better.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
P.S. While we're here, the "shields" of cables should only be
connected to ground at ONE end, preferably closest to the power
supply. Again not always possible, but try.
P.P.S. There are more than a few electrical devices "out there" that
DON'T connect signal ground and safety ground. In these cases, other
means have been used to provide the needed safety.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Bob Campbell" <bob@c...> wrote:
> I just built a power supply and I connected the negative side of
the power
> supply to the same ground as the green wire on my ac input line.
The green
> wire should be an earth ground.
>
> Bob Campbell
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "cncforum" <cncforum@y...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...>
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 4:26 AM
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Does the ground leg of the DC output of the bridge rectifier in an
> > unregulated power supply need to be connected to earth?
> >
> > I have seen one schematic where the power supply is earthed.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> >
> > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> > Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Manager
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
Discussion Thread
wanliker@a...
2001-10-14 12:06:43 UTC
Members
Art Fenerty
2001-10-14 12:51:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Members
JanRwl@A...
2001-10-14 13:23:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Members
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-10-14 17:38:02 UTC
Re: Members
Art Fenerty
2001-10-14 18:38:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
JanRwl@A...
2001-10-14 18:43:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Art Fenerty
2001-10-14 19:07:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-10-14 19:19:07 UTC
Re: Members
Tim Goldstein
2001-10-14 19:57:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
wanliker@a...
2001-10-14 21:08:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-10-15 06:24:45 UTC
Re: Members
Tim Goldstein
2001-10-15 07:05:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
JanRwl@A...
2001-10-15 09:57:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-10-15 11:30:33 UTC
Re: Members
Tim
2001-10-15 12:41:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Art Fenerty
2001-10-15 12:45:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
machines@n...
2001-10-15 13:31:45 UTC
Re: Members
Art Fenerty
2001-10-15 14:44:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Alan Trest
2001-10-15 15:47:26 UTC
Re: Members
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-10-15 16:30:21 UTC
Re: Members
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-10-15 17:02:57 UTC
Re: Members
Tom Murray
2001-10-15 18:37:21 UTC
Re: Members
brian
2001-10-15 19:48:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Sven Peter
2001-10-15 20:37:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]Members
Michael Dhabolt
2001-10-15 20:55:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Jon Elson
2001-10-15 22:04:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Jon Elson
2001-10-15 22:08:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-10-16 06:22:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Smoke
2001-10-16 07:10:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
HighTech
2001-10-16 08:00:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Jon Elson
2001-10-16 10:16:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Jon Elson
2001-10-16 10:28:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Smoke
2001-10-16 10:29:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-10-16 10:31:08 UTC
power supply
Bob Campbell
2001-10-16 11:00:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-10-16 11:02:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-10-16 11:11:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Art Fenerty
2001-10-16 11:18:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Les Newell
2001-10-16 12:27:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
mariss92705@y...
2001-10-16 13:11:55 UTC
Re: Members
beer@s...
2001-10-16 13:17:04 UTC
Re: Members
Paul
2001-10-16 14:39:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
beer@s...
2001-10-16 15:55:58 UTC
Re: power supply
JanRwl@A...
2001-10-16 16:37:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-10-16 16:51:42 UTC
Re: power supply
mariss92705@y...
2001-10-16 17:26:20 UTC
Re: power supply
mariss92705@y...
2001-10-16 17:30:24 UTC
Re: power supply
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-10-16 17:36:19 UTC
Re: power supply
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-10-16 18:42:31 UTC
Re: Members
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-10-16 18:55:21 UTC
Re: power supply
brian
2001-10-16 19:50:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
mariss92705@y...
2001-10-16 19:54:17 UTC
Re: Members
Jon Elson
2001-10-16 20:13:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
Ron Knittle
2001-10-16 21:36:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Members
cncforum
2002-02-03 10:04:42 UTC
power supply
Bob Campbell
2002-02-03 11:56:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-03 12:51:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
Jon Elson
2002-02-03 22:08:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
ballendo
2002-02-04 07:52:15 UTC
Ground loops and star wiring was Re: power supply
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-04 14:07:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
Gene
2002-03-07 22:46:13 UTC
power supply
Mike Snodgrass
2002-09-12 05:42:58 UTC
power supply
turbulatordude
2002-09-12 07:07:48 UTC
Re: power supply
bsptrades
2002-09-12 10:18:00 UTC
Re: power supply
mariss92705
2002-09-12 11:10:36 UTC
Re: power supply
Mike Snodgrass
2002-09-12 16:53:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: power supply
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-09-12 17:27:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: power supply
Jon Elson
2002-09-12 22:31:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: power supply
Lee Studley
2002-09-13 10:42:48 UTC
Re: power supply
Yesamazza@a...
2002-12-28 21:25:25 UTC
power supply
Robert Campbell
2002-12-29 06:04:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2002-12-29 06:51:13 UTC
Re: power supply
Yesamazza@a...
2002-12-29 09:02:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2002-12-29 10:37:56 UTC
Re: power supply
Ron Yost
2002-12-29 11:48:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: power supply
RichD
2002-12-29 13:17:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: power supply
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2002-12-29 13:52:49 UTC
Re: power supply
Ron Yost
2002-12-29 14:11:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: power supply
Ron Yost
2002-12-29 14:14:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: power supply
Tim Goldstein
2002-12-29 14:34:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: power supply
afogassa
2003-09-08 18:50:44 UTC
power supply
afogassa
2003-09-10 15:02:44 UTC
power supply
motorworksnf
2004-02-01 14:06:37 UTC
power supply
Doug Fortune
2004-02-01 15:10:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] power supply