Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-11-27 19:07:53 UTC
In a message dated 11/27/2002 3:24:35 PM Central Standard Time,
davemucha@... writes:
"main filter cap" (the 10,000 to 40,000 cap you are talking about) are longer
than, say, six inches, and are skinnier than they should be (smaller than,
say, #18). But they are a GOOD idea, ANYway, and will probably prevent some
"impossible to find" problems! These 470 uF caps should NOT be thought of
as "DC Filter-caps" but "traps" for hard-to-qualify nasties. Though they DO
also provide SOME 60 Hz. ripple-filtering, but not much.
READ the "white papers" that come with the G201/210! All that is adequately
explained in those pages.
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
davemucha@... writes:
> My question would be if the recommended 470uF cap on the powerDave: This 470 uF cap. (per drive) is necessary ONLY if your DC wires to the
> connection at the Gecko's is now REQUIRED ? if you are going less
> than the book values?
"main filter cap" (the 10,000 to 40,000 cap you are talking about) are longer
than, say, six inches, and are skinnier than they should be (smaller than,
say, #18). But they are a GOOD idea, ANYway, and will probably prevent some
"impossible to find" problems! These 470 uF caps should NOT be thought of
as "DC Filter-caps" but "traps" for hard-to-qualify nasties. Though they DO
also provide SOME 60 Hz. ripple-filtering, but not much.
READ the "white papers" that come with the G201/210! All that is adequately
explained in those pages.
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
ralaco
2002-11-26 15:48:28 UTC
GECKOS 201
turbulatordude
2002-11-26 16:03:02 UTC
Re: GECKOS 201
ralaco
2002-11-26 17:10:03 UTC
Re: GECKOS 201
turbulatordude
2002-11-26 19:19:11 UTC
Re: GECKOS 201
ralaco
2002-11-27 08:37:13 UTC
Re: GECKOS 201
j.guenther
2002-11-27 08:44:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201
ralaco
2002-11-27 08:47:26 UTC
Re: GECKOS 201
caudlet
2002-11-27 09:09:39 UTC
Re: GECKOS 201
Kory Hamzeh
2002-11-27 10:32:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-11-27 10:41:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201
caudlet
2002-11-27 11:47:53 UTC
Re: GECKOS 201
turbulatordude
2002-11-27 13:22:31 UTC
Re: GECKOS 201
Peter Homann
2002-11-27 15:01:09 UTC
G Code for 25 Pin D connector
deanc500
2002-11-27 16:45:38 UTC
Re: G Code for 25 Pin D connector
Robert Campbell
2002-11-27 17:13:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G Code for 25 Pin D connector
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-27 19:07:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-27 19:25:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201
Peter Homann
2002-11-27 19:56:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G Code for 25 Pin D connector
Peter Homann
2002-11-27 20:39:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G Code for 25 Pin D connector
turbulatordude
2002-11-28 08:47:58 UTC
Re: GECKOS 201
Dan Mauch
2002-11-29 07:25:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201
turbulatordude
2002-11-29 09:50:46 UTC
to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201
jeffalanp
2002-11-29 10:49:50 UTC
to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-29 10:56:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201
turbulatordude
2002-11-29 19:15:26 UTC
to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-29 19:51:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201
jeffalanp
2002-11-29 21:52:45 UTC
to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201
turbulatordude
2002-11-30 06:40:31 UTC
to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201