CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: GECKOS 201

on 2002-11-28 08:47:58 UTC
Hi JAn,

I do agree that the 470uF are worth the little effort to install. At
about 4 for a dollar, they are also worth their weight in gold.

My understanding was that the line lenght between the 201 and the
power supply allowed the main filter caps to handle the kickback that
was not handled on board the Gecko's. but, if the length was more
than 18 inches, the 470's are required.

To me this means that the little bit of additional filtering adds
lots of protection. If your main caps were well under size, say, one
third the recomended size, are you losing any of that main filter and
therefore require the 470 ?

In my case, I am using an old PC tower as the box for the power
supply. I mounted the Gecko's on hard disk sleds that fit in the
5.25 drive bays. put the fuse (instantly, 470's are required when
using a fuse) on the drive sled front. This also means the wiring
goes from the power supply along the case, down to the sled, then
with enough left to allow the sled to be pulled to the front.

Running 4 NEMA34's, single stack, series at 2.25amps so I can get by
without a heat sink, but I mounted each one on a 1/4 plate of
aluminum and allow the air entering the box to pass over the Gecko's.

Dave







--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., JanRwl@A... wrote:
> In a message dated 11/27/2002 3:24:35 PM Central Standard Time,
> davemucha@j... writes:
>
> > My question would be if the recommended 470uF cap on the power
> > connection at the Gecko's is now REQUIRED ? if you are going less
> > than the book values?
>
> Dave: This 470 uF cap. (per drive) is necessary ONLY if your DC
wires to the
> "main filter cap" (the 10,000 to 40,000 cap you are talking about)
are longer
> than, say, six inches, and are skinnier than they should be
(smaller than,
> say, #18). But they are a GOOD idea, ANYway, and will probably
prevent some
> "impossible to find" problems! These 470 uF caps should NOT be
thought of
> as "DC Filter-caps" but "traps" for hard-to-qualify nasties.
Though they DO
> also provide SOME 60 Hz. ripple-filtering, but not much.
>
> READ the "white papers" that come with the G201/210! All that is
adequately
> explained in those pages.
>
> Jan Rowland
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

ralaco 2002-11-26 15:48:28 UTC GECKOS 201 turbulatordude 2002-11-26 16:03:02 UTC Re: GECKOS 201 ralaco 2002-11-26 17:10:03 UTC Re: GECKOS 201 turbulatordude 2002-11-26 19:19:11 UTC Re: GECKOS 201 ralaco 2002-11-27 08:37:13 UTC Re: GECKOS 201 j.guenther 2002-11-27 08:44:21 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201 ralaco 2002-11-27 08:47:26 UTC Re: GECKOS 201 caudlet 2002-11-27 09:09:39 UTC Re: GECKOS 201 Kory Hamzeh 2002-11-27 10:32:56 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201 Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-11-27 10:41:21 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201 caudlet 2002-11-27 11:47:53 UTC Re: GECKOS 201 turbulatordude 2002-11-27 13:22:31 UTC Re: GECKOS 201 Peter Homann 2002-11-27 15:01:09 UTC G Code for 25 Pin D connector deanc500 2002-11-27 16:45:38 UTC Re: G Code for 25 Pin D connector Robert Campbell 2002-11-27 17:13:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G Code for 25 Pin D connector JanRwl@A... 2002-11-27 19:07:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201 JanRwl@A... 2002-11-27 19:25:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201 Peter Homann 2002-11-27 19:56:09 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G Code for 25 Pin D connector Peter Homann 2002-11-27 20:39:59 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G Code for 25 Pin D connector turbulatordude 2002-11-28 08:47:58 UTC Re: GECKOS 201 Dan Mauch 2002-11-29 07:25:07 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201 turbulatordude 2002-11-29 09:50:46 UTC to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201 jeffalanp 2002-11-29 10:49:50 UTC to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201 JanRwl@A... 2002-11-29 10:56:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GECKOS 201 turbulatordude 2002-11-29 19:15:26 UTC to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201 Tim Goldstein 2002-11-29 19:51:10 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201 jeffalanp 2002-11-29 21:52:45 UTC to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201 turbulatordude 2002-11-30 06:40:31 UTC to Low ESR or not to Low ESR, that is the ... ( was Re: GECKOS 201