CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive

Posted by Marv Frankel
on 2003-01-03 08:06:06 UTC
Hoyt,
I'd really like to see a photo of that arrangement, if if you have one
available.

Marv Frankel
Los Angeles

----- Original Message -----
From: <bjammin@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive


> At 08:17 AM 1/3/03 -0000, you wrote:
> >With direct drive, unless you are very confident of the alignment of
> >motor spindle with the screw, you should always use a coupling that
> >is tolerant of misalignment;
>
> Not at all ... I hung motors directly on screws once using rigid
couplings,
> which I made in one op for good concentricity. The motors just overhung
the
> screw ends, right out in space. The motors were drag-linked to the machine
> frame using a stay from flange to the anchor point. The stay can be
> slightly flexie from side to side as long as it doesn't stretch or shrink
> when torque is applied. This is the most rigid arrangement possible for
> transmitting torque, and the motor and screw bearings have no trouble
> supporting the motor weight. Try it, it's clean, simple, quick and very
> effective.
>
> Regards, Hoyt McKagen
>
> To prevent virus propogation, please don't put this addy in your book
> Belfab CNC - http://www.freeyellow.com/members/belfab/belfab.html
> Best MC - http://www.freeyellow.com/members/batwings/best.html
> Camping/Caving - http://www.freeyellow.com/members/batwings/caving.html
> Two-Wheel-Tech List - http://batwings.freeyellow.com/2whfaq.html
> Religious strife proves that there's no God
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Discussion Thread

dennis_kramer2001 <dennis.kramer@a... 2003-01-02 17:14:08 UTC Belt vs. Direct Drive Robert Campbell 2003-01-02 17:51:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Doug Fortune 2003-01-02 18:51:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Chris Baugher 2003-01-02 19:18:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Doug Fortune 2003-01-03 01:11:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Tony Jeffree <tony@j... 2003-01-03 01:17:12 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive jeffalanp <xylotex@h... 2003-01-03 01:19:14 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive torsten98001 <torsten@g... 2003-01-03 03:02:04 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive bjammin@i... 2003-01-03 07:26:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Marv Frankel 2003-01-03 08:06:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Garry & Maxine Foster 2003-01-03 08:27:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive CL 2003-01-03 10:58:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive CL 2003-01-03 11:23:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-03 11:34:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tim Goldstein 2003-01-03 11:46:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Chris Baugher 2003-01-03 12:13:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Chris Baugher 2003-01-03 18:31:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive jeffalanp <xylotex@h... 2003-01-03 18:43:49 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tony Jeffree 2003-01-03 21:51:52 UTC Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tony Jeffree 2003-01-03 22:14:42 UTC Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive bjammin@i... 2003-01-04 00:00:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tim Goldstein 2003-01-04 10:38:57 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-04 16:24:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Ron Kline 2003-01-04 16:58:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-04 17:33:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive jwalters 2003-01-04 18:13:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Dave Kowalczyk <dkowalcz@d... 2003-01-04 18:53:19 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Ron Kline 2003-01-04 20:11:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Jon Elson 2003-01-04 22:26:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-05 15:45:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Jon Elson 2003-01-05 23:12:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-08 08:12:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Jon Elson 2003-01-08 23:26:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive