CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive

on 2003-01-04 18:53:19 UTC
Alex:

Certainly. This is somewhat akin to the basis for the hexapod and
other unconventional geometry machines that are out there - e.g:
stacking two rotary tables and using some special pre-processing to
get XY motion.

Things like backlash, lead errors, and out-of-squareness are not
hard to deal with in software. But the dynamic deflections that come
with low rigidity are. Now software can't turn a drill press and an
XY table into a Mitsubishi VMC, but generally you'll be ok if you
stay within reasonable limits.

For example, my mini-mill has about .007" backlash on XY (varies),
but it can make a bearing bore good enough for a press-fit by milling
with backlash comp on and not being in too much of a hurry about it.

Good luck.

Dave Kowalczyk
Everett WA
http://www.dakeng.com

>----- Original Message -----
>In this respect I wonder if it is possible to build a very crude
>machine, with a worst possible screws and backlash everywhere and
>try to compensate for it in a software to the point of an
>accurate machine?
> Alex

Discussion Thread

dennis_kramer2001 <dennis.kramer@a... 2003-01-02 17:14:08 UTC Belt vs. Direct Drive Robert Campbell 2003-01-02 17:51:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Doug Fortune 2003-01-02 18:51:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Chris Baugher 2003-01-02 19:18:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Doug Fortune 2003-01-03 01:11:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Tony Jeffree <tony@j... 2003-01-03 01:17:12 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive jeffalanp <xylotex@h... 2003-01-03 01:19:14 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive torsten98001 <torsten@g... 2003-01-03 03:02:04 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive bjammin@i... 2003-01-03 07:26:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Marv Frankel 2003-01-03 08:06:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Garry & Maxine Foster 2003-01-03 08:27:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive CL 2003-01-03 10:58:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive CL 2003-01-03 11:23:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-03 11:34:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tim Goldstein 2003-01-03 11:46:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Chris Baugher 2003-01-03 12:13:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Chris Baugher 2003-01-03 18:31:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive jeffalanp <xylotex@h... 2003-01-03 18:43:49 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tony Jeffree 2003-01-03 21:51:52 UTC Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tony Jeffree 2003-01-03 22:14:42 UTC Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive bjammin@i... 2003-01-04 00:00:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tim Goldstein 2003-01-04 10:38:57 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-04 16:24:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Ron Kline 2003-01-04 16:58:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-04 17:33:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive jwalters 2003-01-04 18:13:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Dave Kowalczyk <dkowalcz@d... 2003-01-04 18:53:19 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Ron Kline 2003-01-04 20:11:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Jon Elson 2003-01-04 22:26:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-05 15:45:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Jon Elson 2003-01-05 23:12:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-08 08:12:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Jon Elson 2003-01-08 23:26:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive