Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive
Posted by
CL
on 2003-01-03 10:58:51 UTC
Doug wrote ?:
machines. It is not just a typical spider setup, but one that has its
"fingers" curved around the rubber/urethane portion for an even tighter
grip. They pull apart very hard. I even have some takeouts laying
around. There may have been a "wind-up" on them but we ran those
machines on fine diamond drag work that if it was off position, you'd
see it when the machine changed direction. Even the finest of images
were perfect.
though they are made to give you some deviation in alignment, your still
best of getting it as aligned as possible to avoid breakage.
Even the smallest of ones I've seen seen rotationally tighter than tight.
One thing I DID conclude is that noise transfer sure can be excessive
with the helicals especially on Stepper drives. So, if it's noise you
dislike. Stick with Rubber on those direct drives.
C
>(snip).. I use steel/rubber spider/steel couplers which work great.I have seen some that go a little beyond the normal used on NewHermes
>Very rigid in torsion (snip)
>
>
machines. It is not just a typical spider setup, but one that has its
"fingers" curved around the rubber/urethane portion for an even tighter
grip. They pull apart very hard. I even have some takeouts laying
around. There may have been a "wind-up" on them but we ran those
machines on fine diamond drag work that if it was off position, you'd
see it when the machine changed direction. Even the finest of images
were perfect.
>What scared me off (early aluminum) helical couplers was that theyI've seen them break too as they are actually fragile. I think even
>tended to break, (snip)
>
though they are made to give you some deviation in alignment, your still
best of getting it as aligned as possible to avoid breakage.
>(snip) I think they must have a little 'wind up' and hence a resonantBoy, If one actually did a twist measurement test, it couldn't be much.
>frequency,
>
Even the smallest of ones I've seen seen rotationally tighter than tight.
One thing I DID conclude is that noise transfer sure can be excessive
with the helicals especially on Stepper drives. So, if it's noise you
dislike. Stick with Rubber on those direct drives.
C
Discussion Thread
dennis_kramer2001 <dennis.kramer@a...
2003-01-02 17:14:08 UTC
Belt vs. Direct Drive
Robert Campbell
2003-01-02 17:51:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive
Doug Fortune
2003-01-02 18:51:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive
Chris Baugher
2003-01-02 19:18:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive
Doug Fortune
2003-01-03 01:11:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive
Tony Jeffree <tony@j...
2003-01-03 01:17:12 UTC
Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
jeffalanp <xylotex@h...
2003-01-03 01:19:14 UTC
Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
torsten98001 <torsten@g...
2003-01-03 03:02:04 UTC
Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
bjammin@i...
2003-01-03 07:26:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Marv Frankel
2003-01-03 08:06:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Garry & Maxine Foster
2003-01-03 08:27:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
CL
2003-01-03 10:58:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive
CL
2003-01-03 11:23:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
alex
2003-01-03 11:34:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Tim Goldstein
2003-01-03 11:46:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Chris Baugher
2003-01-03 12:13:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive
Chris Baugher
2003-01-03 18:31:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
jeffalanp <xylotex@h...
2003-01-03 18:43:49 UTC
Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Tony Jeffree
2003-01-03 21:51:52 UTC
Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Tony Jeffree
2003-01-03 22:14:42 UTC
Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
bjammin@i...
2003-01-04 00:00:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Tim Goldstein
2003-01-04 10:38:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
alex
2003-01-04 16:24:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Ron Kline
2003-01-04 16:58:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
alex
2003-01-04 17:33:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
jwalters
2003-01-04 18:13:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Dave Kowalczyk <dkowalcz@d...
2003-01-04 18:53:19 UTC
Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Ron Kline
2003-01-04 20:11:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Jon Elson
2003-01-04 22:26:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
alex
2003-01-05 15:45:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Jon Elson
2003-01-05 23:12:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
alex
2003-01-08 08:12:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive
Jon Elson
2003-01-08 23:26:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive