CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive

Posted by alex
on 2003-01-05 15:45:13 UTC
Jon.
Yes, anti-backlash screw should make it very rigid - so probably I will go
this root.
I checked your products and they seem to represent a great value for the
money.
Its amazing what people can have now for a few hundred dollars. I was
looking
at the recent KBC tool flier - Basic milling machine is $6,625 Cdn.
The same machine with 2 axis CNC - $25,000 Cdn. I think, using your staff,
the same
conversion can be done within $10,000 Cdn. Not a bad saving!
Alex


----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Elson <elson@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive


>
>
> alex wrote:
>
> >Granted - climb milling is a special case. I remember I broke a mill bit
> >even on
> >a huge hydraulic mill - don't remember what make, it was 25 years ago.
> >(this contributed to my search for a new career).
> >It probably can be avoided in a CAM. Don't think Bridgeport will do climb
> >milling.
> >This requires extremely rigid machine.
> >
> >
> I do climb milling on my CNC'd Bridgeport all the time. When machining
> aluminum, especially,
> climb milling makes a vastly better surface finish, as it does not mash
> chips into the clean,
> retreating surface. I always did a climb mill pass with a very thin cut
> to clean up the surface
> when it was a manual machine. But now, I program almost all my cuts for
> climb milling.
> It is also known to reduce tool wear, as it prevents the cutting edge
> from skating along the
> work surface. I DO have anti-backlash ballscrews.
>
> Jon
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>

Discussion Thread

dennis_kramer2001 <dennis.kramer@a... 2003-01-02 17:14:08 UTC Belt vs. Direct Drive Robert Campbell 2003-01-02 17:51:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Doug Fortune 2003-01-02 18:51:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Chris Baugher 2003-01-02 19:18:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Doug Fortune 2003-01-03 01:11:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Tony Jeffree <tony@j... 2003-01-03 01:17:12 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive jeffalanp <xylotex@h... 2003-01-03 01:19:14 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive torsten98001 <torsten@g... 2003-01-03 03:02:04 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive bjammin@i... 2003-01-03 07:26:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Marv Frankel 2003-01-03 08:06:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Garry & Maxine Foster 2003-01-03 08:27:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive CL 2003-01-03 10:58:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive CL 2003-01-03 11:23:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-03 11:34:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tim Goldstein 2003-01-03 11:46:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Chris Baugher 2003-01-03 12:13:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belt vs. Direct Drive Chris Baugher 2003-01-03 18:31:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive jeffalanp <xylotex@h... 2003-01-03 18:43:49 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tony Jeffree 2003-01-03 21:51:52 UTC Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tony Jeffree 2003-01-03 22:14:42 UTC Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive bjammin@i... 2003-01-04 00:00:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Tim Goldstein 2003-01-04 10:38:57 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-04 16:24:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Ron Kline 2003-01-04 16:58:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-04 17:33:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive jwalters 2003-01-04 18:13:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Dave Kowalczyk <dkowalcz@d... 2003-01-04 18:53:19 UTC Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Ron Kline 2003-01-04 20:11:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Jon Elson 2003-01-04 22:26:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-05 15:45:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Jon Elson 2003-01-05 23:12:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive alex 2003-01-08 08:12:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive Jon Elson 2003-01-08 23:26:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Belt vs. Direct Drive