Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
on 2003-02-09 08:04:19 UTC
Terry,
The problem there is the MOSFETs. We use IRF530s which are 100V
rated, the next size up is 200V. The physics of MOSFETs is if the
voltage doubles then the "on" resistance quadruples, meaning the chip
size must quadruple in order to get the same "on" resistance.
That requires a much larger TO-247 package, blowing the whole thing
out of the water. Furthermore, many motor mfgs. now rate their motors
with a maximum operating voltage, usually around 65V.
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "James Owens"
<wotisname@l...> wrote:
The problem there is the MOSFETs. We use IRF530s which are 100V
rated, the next size up is 200V. The physics of MOSFETs is if the
voltage doubles then the "on" resistance quadruples, meaning the chip
size must quadruple in order to get the same "on" resistance.
That requires a much larger TO-247 package, blowing the whole thing
out of the water. Furthermore, many motor mfgs. now rate their motors
with a maximum operating voltage, usually around 65V.
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "James Owens"
<wotisname@l...> wrote:
> Hi Mariss,100?
>
> If this is a complete redesign why not up the max Voltage to about
>
> Regards,
>
> Terry
>
> > > This is a "clean sheet" redesign so now is the time for it.
Discussion Thread
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-08 14:34:09 UTC
Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-08 16:04:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-08 16:23:34 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-08 17:10:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Cullins
2003-02-08 17:18:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Cullins
2003-02-08 17:18:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-08 18:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-08 18:24:40 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
David
2003-02-08 18:40:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-02-08 18:52:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-08 18:58:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Doug Fortune
2003-02-08 20:32:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
onealcustom <onealcustom@a...
2003-02-08 21:09:36 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-08 21:37:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
mayfieldtm <mayfiet@i...
2003-02-08 23:27:57 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Tony Jeffree
2003-02-09 00:31:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Tony Jeffree
2003-02-09 00:37:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
CL
2003-02-09 06:22:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-09 08:04:19 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Bernard R <bwjarandall@c...
2003-02-09 08:27:57 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-09 08:43:50 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-09 08:47:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Doug Fortune
2003-02-09 09:24:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
EdFanta
2003-02-09 10:42:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-09 13:23:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-09 14:20:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-09 14:21:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-09 14:23:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Tony Jeffree
2003-02-09 15:09:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Tony Jeffree
2003-02-09 15:21:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Chris L
2003-02-09 16:31:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
mayfieldtm <mayfiet@i...
2003-02-09 16:56:37 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
ajv2803959 <antonio-ximenez@t...
2003-02-10 02:06:05 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-10 08:05:22 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-10 10:55:58 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
fortino tan
2003-02-11 05:26:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-12 05:44:14 UTC
re:Dougs step/dir plan was Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Jon Elson
2003-02-12 10:06:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Dougs step/dir plan was Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
jmkasunich <jmkasunich@y...
2003-02-12 10:41:28 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-12 12:18:04 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-12 14:26:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
jmkasunich <jmkasunich@y...
2003-02-12 15:07:52 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
jmkasunich <jmkasunich@y...
2003-02-12 15:11:18 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-12 17:30:32 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
wanliker@a...
2003-02-12 21:51:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-12 23:10:55 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-13 04:17:58 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Cullins
2003-02-13 05:51:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210