Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Posted by
Chris L
on 2003-02-09 16:31:27 UTC
Doug Fortune wrote:
a "proprietary" language (which of course could be shared if the
developer desired to), communicating with external hardware via USB or
even serial port can eliminate some of that. I have heard rumors
lost..... Even on my simple 3 axis router, I assure you I can and do
have more than one motor turning, and in opposite directions at any
given time, even for simple 2d profiles. How could one cut a 2d arc
where I would need to have negative movement in X and positive movement
in Y, yet having only one direction available ?? I hate to even get into
full 3d continuous motion work where if I do not have the option to run
motors at any direction at anytime.......
Not sure I'd want to give up the ability for turning any motor any
direction I want, at any time.......
I probably missed something. My better half says I never listen very well !
My eyes don't read so good either anymore, not to mention the brain that
is slowing down !
them. To my knowledge, Marriss and Flashcut have discussed it
thoroughly. As far as I know, FC can run them now. I know FC has added a
few extra driver adjustments in order to get a good "grip" on every
driver one might end up using.
Not being confrontational, Just was trying to get an idea where you
wanted to use that concept. I'm sure there is a use for everything.
thanks,
Chris L
>Everything we normally do, lathes, mills, routers, andClearly this is a good reason for "Black Box" control techniques. Using
>also hexapods (Stewart Platforms). Saving output pins
>means more functionality in your machine, because those
>output signals can now be used for something else.
>
a "proprietary" language (which of course could be shared if the
developer desired to), communicating with external hardware via USB or
even serial port can eliminate some of that. I have heard rumors
>>It would appear to be for some type of "single axis at a time positioning"Maybe by a "hand cranker".... but, On a CNC mill or Router ?? Now I am
>>
>>
>
>Absolutely not!
>
>This is a general scheme. In fact, moving axes together at exactly
>the same time (other than for 45 degree moves) is statistically
>exceptionally rare ...
>
lost..... Even on my simple 3 axis router, I assure you I can and do
have more than one motor turning, and in opposite directions at any
given time, even for simple 2d profiles. How could one cut a 2d arc
where I would need to have negative movement in X and positive movement
in Y, yet having only one direction available ?? I hate to even get into
full 3d continuous motion work where if I do not have the option to run
motors at any direction at anytime.......
Not sure I'd want to give up the ability for turning any motor any
direction I want, at any time.......
I probably missed something. My better half says I never listen very well !
My eyes don't read so good either anymore, not to mention the brain that
is slowing down !
>but it won't workNow this I am a little familiar with as Flashcut had a hard time driving
>for the current generation of G201/G210/G320/G340 because apparently
>the direction pins can't be changed arbitrarily after a step pulse.
>
them. To my knowledge, Marriss and Flashcut have discussed it
thoroughly. As far as I know, FC can run them now. I know FC has added a
few extra driver adjustments in order to get a good "grip" on every
driver one might end up using.
Not being confrontational, Just was trying to get an idea where you
wanted to use that concept. I'm sure there is a use for everything.
thanks,
Chris L
Discussion Thread
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-08 14:34:09 UTC
Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-08 16:04:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-08 16:23:34 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-08 17:10:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Cullins
2003-02-08 17:18:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Cullins
2003-02-08 17:18:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-08 18:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-08 18:24:40 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
David
2003-02-08 18:40:42 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-02-08 18:52:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-08 18:58:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Doug Fortune
2003-02-08 20:32:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
onealcustom <onealcustom@a...
2003-02-08 21:09:36 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-08 21:37:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
mayfieldtm <mayfiet@i...
2003-02-08 23:27:57 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Tony Jeffree
2003-02-09 00:31:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Tony Jeffree
2003-02-09 00:37:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
CL
2003-02-09 06:22:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-09 08:04:19 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Bernard R <bwjarandall@c...
2003-02-09 08:27:57 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-09 08:43:50 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-09 08:47:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Doug Fortune
2003-02-09 09:24:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
EdFanta
2003-02-09 10:42:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-09 13:23:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-09 14:20:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-09 14:21:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
JanRwl@A...
2003-02-09 14:23:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Tony Jeffree
2003-02-09 15:09:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Tony Jeffree
2003-02-09 15:21:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Chris L
2003-02-09 16:31:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
mayfieldtm <mayfiet@i...
2003-02-09 16:56:37 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
ajv2803959 <antonio-ximenez@t...
2003-02-10 02:06:05 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-10 08:05:22 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-10 10:55:58 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
fortino tan
2003-02-11 05:26:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-12 05:44:14 UTC
re:Dougs step/dir plan was Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Jon Elson
2003-02-12 10:06:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Dougs step/dir plan was Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
jmkasunich <jmkasunich@y...
2003-02-12 10:41:28 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-12 12:18:04 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Owens
2003-02-12 14:26:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
jmkasunich <jmkasunich@y...
2003-02-12 15:07:52 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
jmkasunich <jmkasunich@y...
2003-02-12 15:11:18 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-12 17:30:32 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
wanliker@a...
2003-02-12 21:51:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-12 23:10:55 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-13 04:17:58 UTC
Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210
James Cullins
2003-02-13 05:51:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bullet-Proof G201 / G210