Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-02-22 10:59:51 UTC
Robin Szemeti wrote:
beginner, but now that I've learned it, it appears to work very reliably.
I do have one part I designed using the 3-D surface stuff that didn't quite
handle the intersection of a sloping arch to a plane. But, when it drew the
toolpath, it was clear what it was going to cut, and I just made it like
that,
as it was only a little off. That is the only place I have seen it make an
error. Otherwise, if I draw it, it will cut it as drawn. There is a
command
to create an offset from an existing chain of lines, arcs, etc.
final dimensions
due to tool deflection and cutter size.
It would also need M3/M5 words before the contours
to turn the plasma torch on and off ... I couldn't see how that was achieved
either ...
You could probably set up custom g-code commands for this, I think there's
something that allows you to add your own commands when going between
non-cutting and cutting moves.
But, then
individual CNC controls are so picky about these points, I'd just as
soon do it
manually, anyway. Customer service is non-existant - think of this as
shrink-wrap
software with no phone number.
All the above applies specifically to Bobcad/CAM 16.1 only. The newer
versions may be better or worse.
Jon
>On Sunday 22 February 2004 10:03, stevenson_engineers wrote:Bobcad/CAM 16.1 certainly does this. It is quirky and unintuitive to the
>
>
>
>>Actually Cliff the guy who replied, Mike, owns the company he's not a
>>rep.
>>I can't fault the service I get from this company but more
>>importantly the product.
>>Over on one of the other lists they have also been asking questions
>>about Bobcad, V19 in particular.
>>It appears that there is a print bug in this that won't allow you to
>>print.
>>They know of this but still sell it without a work around other than
>>using a screen capture, [ pause for hoots of maniacial laughter
>>here ....]
>>The first bug fix was pulled off the web site almost immediatly and
>>the second one well over a week later is causing machines to crash.
>>BUT..... they posted " Did you see the enhancements we switched
>>on......."
>>
>>
>
>Has bobcad evolved beyond the basic state it was in when I tried it? .. last
>time I looked at using iot (for simple plasma profiling) all I wanted to do
>was draw a part (say a square with a circular hole in the middle) and have
>BobCAD produce a toolpath correctly offset 0.5mm larger than the square, and
>0.5mm smaller than the internal circle. ALL proper CAM software can do this
>.. can BobCAD?
>
beginner, but now that I've learned it, it appears to work very reliably.
I do have one part I designed using the 3-D surface stuff that didn't quite
handle the intersection of a sloping arch to a plane. But, when it drew the
toolpath, it was clear what it was going to cut, and I just made it like
that,
as it was only a little off. That is the only place I have seen it make an
error. Otherwise, if I draw it, it will cut it as drawn. There is a
command
to create an offset from an existing chain of lines, arcs, etc.
> I'd have happily accepted it using G41 and G40 to select theI have done this, manually, in cases where I might need to adjust the
>compensation in the CNC, but ti didn;t seem to have that option either .. and
>to use G41/G40 you would need some form of lead-in generation, which BobCad
>didnt appear to have ...
>
>
final dimensions
due to tool deflection and cutter size.
It would also need M3/M5 words before the contours
to turn the plasma torch on and off ... I couldn't see how that was achieved
either ...
You could probably set up custom g-code commands for this, I think there's
something that allows you to add your own commands when going between
non-cutting and cutting moves.
>.. last tiem I asked I didn;t even get a reply, on the third time of asking INo, it doesn't automatically figure out the lead-in and lead-out points.
>was told to 'draw a line around the part and have the toolpath follow that'
>... what about automatic lead-in/lead-out? hmmm ?? .. I can't see any point
>in investgating the 'new 3d version' of BobCAD until they get the very basic
>bits sorted out. As a CAD package it seemed OK, as a CAM package, it didn;t
>seem to have any of the basic functionality I would have expected.
>
>
>
But, then
individual CNC controls are so picky about these points, I'd just as
soon do it
manually, anyway. Customer service is non-existant - think of this as
shrink-wrap
software with no phone number.
All the above applies specifically to Bobcad/CAM 16.1 only. The newer
versions may be better or worse.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Buck Sisson
2004-02-18 19:55:41 UTC
Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ibewgypsie
2004-02-19 02:00:28 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Mike Mueller
2004-02-19 07:34:16 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ballendo
2004-02-19 08:09:51 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Fred Smith
2004-02-19 08:11:01 UTC
Re: Try Vector instead, was Has anybody tried BobCad software?
metlmunchr
2004-02-19 08:36:21 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Jon Elson
2004-02-19 08:51:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Ron Thompson
2004-02-19 18:37:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ballendo
2004-02-20 06:51:16 UTC
Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Bill Vance
2004-02-20 07:18:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Ron Thompson
2004-02-20 08:22:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Jon Elson
2004-02-20 09:47:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
CV Desper
2004-02-20 09:53:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
xlch58@s...
2004-02-20 18:50:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Myron Cherry
2004-02-20 23:29:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Michael Milligan
2004-02-21 01:12:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
james_cullins@s...
2004-02-21 06:18:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ballendo
2004-02-21 06:41:09 UTC
Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ballendo
2004-02-21 06:41:13 UTC
Sherline vs. Taig head
turbulatordude
2004-02-21 06:47:35 UTC
Re: Sherline vs. Taig head
Michael Milligan
2004-02-21 06:58:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Ron Thompson
2004-02-21 07:09:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head
james_cullins@s...
2004-02-21 07:17:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
james_cullins@s...
2004-02-21 07:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Harvey White
2004-02-21 11:53:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Sherline vs. Taig head
metlmunchr
2004-02-21 12:07:57 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Bill Vance
2004-02-21 15:12:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Sherline vs. Taig head
stevenson_engineers
2004-02-22 06:05:56 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Statman Designs, LLC
2004-02-22 06:25:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Robin Szemeti
2004-02-22 06:49:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Ron Thompson
2004-02-22 07:04:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
stevenson_engineers
2004-02-22 07:37:27 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Jon Elson
2004-02-22 10:59:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Statman Designs, LLC
2004-02-22 11:23:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
wanliker@a...
2004-02-22 20:31:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?