Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Posted by
ballendo
on 2004-02-20 06:51:16 UTC
Ron,
Several things, really.
Most important is the motor and drive that comes with it. Universal
input--ac,dc,90-250v-- speed controlled dc motor. Motor mounting is
MUCH better than the Taig(just look at the pics of each on the Mfr's
sites...)
Next, although the taig and sherline both use 3/4-16 threads, they
are slightly different in the lengths of various features. And
sherline, IMO has a better selection--and better quality-- of spindle
related accessories.
The Sherline has a 10K RPM option. I don't know if Taig does. But if
they do, I'd again question their motor and it's terrible mounting.
And finally, the sherline is the head that Joe Vicar used to develop
his auto tool changer. He's working on adapting it to other heads,
but there's something to be said for using what it was made on/for.
Against this, if you don't mind the lower fit and finish of the
items, you can get spindle accessories from Taig at lower cost than
from sherline. (But I read earlier tonight 2 comments about what to
do to make the taig 3 jaw chuck grip steel 1-1/2" firmly; the single
response said, (paraphrased)"I don't know either. I just take light
cuts and deal with it" Now the question is not about lathes, but this
question/answer is in line with my personal experience of taig vs.
sherline parts. (They both work; but the sherline QC and finish is
better, IMO.)
And only an opinion, but in that opinion, Sherline is a better
company to deal with...
Ballendo
P.S. Paul over at www.cnconabudget.com is offering adapters to mount
the Sherline Head to the Taig. Based on the response, I'd say I'm not
alone in feeling that the Sherline head is overall superior to the
Taig. (But the Taig is superior to the sherline for steel cutting,
IMO.)
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Ron Thompson"
<barebooger@c...> wrote:
it if you have trouble.
are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
EXCEPTIONS........
Several things, really.
Most important is the motor and drive that comes with it. Universal
input--ac,dc,90-250v-- speed controlled dc motor. Motor mounting is
MUCH better than the Taig(just look at the pics of each on the Mfr's
sites...)
Next, although the taig and sherline both use 3/4-16 threads, they
are slightly different in the lengths of various features. And
sherline, IMO has a better selection--and better quality-- of spindle
related accessories.
The Sherline has a 10K RPM option. I don't know if Taig does. But if
they do, I'd again question their motor and it's terrible mounting.
And finally, the sherline is the head that Joe Vicar used to develop
his auto tool changer. He's working on adapting it to other heads,
but there's something to be said for using what it was made on/for.
Against this, if you don't mind the lower fit and finish of the
items, you can get spindle accessories from Taig at lower cost than
from sherline. (But I read earlier tonight 2 comments about what to
do to make the taig 3 jaw chuck grip steel 1-1/2" firmly; the single
response said, (paraphrased)"I don't know either. I just take light
cuts and deal with it" Now the question is not about lathes, but this
question/answer is in line with my personal experience of taig vs.
sherline parts. (They both work; but the sherline QC and finish is
better, IMO.)
And only an opinion, but in that opinion, Sherline is a better
company to deal with...
Ballendo
P.S. Paul over at www.cnconabudget.com is offering adapters to mount
the Sherline Head to the Taig. Based on the response, I'd say I'm not
alone in feeling that the Sherline head is overall superior to the
Taig. (But the Taig is superior to the sherline for steel cutting,
IMO.)
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Ron Thompson"
<barebooger@c...> wrote:
> What is the advantage to the Sherline head?Space Center, USA
>
> Ron Thompson
> Was On the Beautiful Mississippi Gulf Coast,
> Now On the Beautiful Florida Space Coast, right beside the Kennedy
>CNC
> http://www.plansandprojects.com
>
> The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
> to fill the world with fools.
> --Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ballendo
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:47 AM
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd look at the Taig mill, with a sherline head...
>
> We just discussed this either here in CCED, or over at the DIY-
> yahoo group...concerned
>
> Ballendo
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Buck Sisson" <buck@r...>
> wrote:
> > I am trying to get started on a CNC milling system and am
> > about alot of things? As usual I am trying to keep the costsdown
> butbeen
> > still windup with a system that I can use.
> > It seems that several different sources of CAD softare have
> > tried out by this group and I would like some suggetions as towhat
> I8020
> > need to get started with. I have been looking at the Sherline
> > mill package and am a little worried about its ability tomachine
> > mild steel.wanliker@a..., timg@k...
> > Any ideas???
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... davemucha@j...[Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DROaol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.htmlto be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Buck Sisson
2004-02-18 19:55:41 UTC
Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ibewgypsie
2004-02-19 02:00:28 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Mike Mueller
2004-02-19 07:34:16 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ballendo
2004-02-19 08:09:51 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Fred Smith
2004-02-19 08:11:01 UTC
Re: Try Vector instead, was Has anybody tried BobCad software?
metlmunchr
2004-02-19 08:36:21 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Jon Elson
2004-02-19 08:51:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Ron Thompson
2004-02-19 18:37:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ballendo
2004-02-20 06:51:16 UTC
Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Bill Vance
2004-02-20 07:18:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Ron Thompson
2004-02-20 08:22:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Jon Elson
2004-02-20 09:47:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
CV Desper
2004-02-20 09:53:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
xlch58@s...
2004-02-20 18:50:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Myron Cherry
2004-02-20 23:29:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Michael Milligan
2004-02-21 01:12:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
james_cullins@s...
2004-02-21 06:18:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ballendo
2004-02-21 06:41:09 UTC
Sherline vs. Taig head was Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
ballendo
2004-02-21 06:41:13 UTC
Sherline vs. Taig head
turbulatordude
2004-02-21 06:47:35 UTC
Re: Sherline vs. Taig head
Michael Milligan
2004-02-21 06:58:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Ron Thompson
2004-02-21 07:09:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Sherline vs. Taig head
james_cullins@s...
2004-02-21 07:17:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
james_cullins@s...
2004-02-21 07:24:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Harvey White
2004-02-21 11:53:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Sherline vs. Taig head
metlmunchr
2004-02-21 12:07:57 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Bill Vance
2004-02-21 15:12:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Sherline vs. Taig head
stevenson_engineers
2004-02-22 06:05:56 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Statman Designs, LLC
2004-02-22 06:25:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Robin Szemeti
2004-02-22 06:49:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Ron Thompson
2004-02-22 07:04:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
stevenson_engineers
2004-02-22 07:37:27 UTC
Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Jon Elson
2004-02-22 10:59:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
Statman Designs, LLC
2004-02-22 11:23:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?
wanliker@a...
2004-02-22 20:31:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Has anybody tried BobCad software?