Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Posted by
Mike Phillips
on 2005-01-27 07:42:19 UTC
I downloaded the v17 version of Bobcad from their site. The sales guy
calls me and I tell him I'd rather have solids modeling in v19 rather
than wire frame in v17. He tells me that since Bobcad just released
v20, that v19 is not $1500, but is now $600. v19 has solids and CAM
built right in. This all happened last Saturday over the phone. Hope
it helps.
I've used Rhine since it was a beta. Very nice. Wish I could justify
the RhinoCAM's cost. Maybe signing up for a class would help.
Mike
calls me and I tell him I'd rather have solids modeling in v19 rather
than wire frame in v17. He tells me that since Bobcad just released
v20, that v19 is not $1500, but is now $600. v19 has solids and CAM
built right in. This all happened last Saturday over the phone. Hope
it helps.
I've used Rhine since it was a beta. Very nice. Wish I could justify
the RhinoCAM's cost. Maybe signing up for a class would help.
Mike
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Will" <nmbmxer@y...> wrote:
>
>
> I am looking for a Cad/Cam program to use on a Shoptask machine, so
I
> need both a mill and a lathe module. I was looking into Vector, but
> after using the demo for a couple days, its not quite what I was
> looking for. I've had several years of Autocad in college, and I
find
> it faster to use when making wireframe 3d models, it just doesnt do
> cam. I also learned featurecam, so thats what I tend to compare
> software to, too bad I'll never be able to afford it.
> Are there any low priced (<$900) cad/cam programs that use
> solid models instead of wireframes? Or should I just look into
> getting a Cam program and using AutoCad to generate the surface
> models?
> William
Discussion Thread
Will
2005-01-19 07:25:46 UTC
Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-19 07:41:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-19 08:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Robert Campbell
2005-01-19 08:15:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Will
2005-01-19 10:42:47 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-01-19 18:30:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Will
2005-01-20 13:03:50 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Robert Campbell
2005-01-20 13:34:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Mike Phillips
2005-01-27 07:42:19 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Ted Gregorius
2005-01-27 07:59:28 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-27 09:32:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
(no author)
2005-01-27 10:00:07 UTC
Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-27 10:33:16 UTC
Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Rob Polley
2005-01-27 12:19:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
cnc_4_me
2005-01-27 13:00:53 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Mike Phillips
2005-01-28 09:57:09 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-28 10:06:20 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
metlmunchr
2005-01-28 11:13:31 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Alan Marconett
2005-01-28 12:24:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-28 16:01:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Raymond Heckert
2005-01-29 18:51:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-29 19:06:50 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 06:10:54 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-31 07:28:35 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Jeff Jones
2005-01-31 08:51:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 09:26:02 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 09:42:01 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-31 10:03:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-31 10:09:55 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 13:15:13 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-01-31 13:19:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam