CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Solid modeling/Cam

Posted by Fred Smith
on 2005-01-31 09:42:01 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Jones" <cnc@d...>
wrote:
>
>
> > >I know it is the cheapest 4th
> > > axis software out there,
> >
> > Actually Vector is less expensive for hobbyists.
>
> Is there an upgrade path from "VectorCad Wireframe Hobby" and
> "VectorCad 3D Surface Hobby "?

Nope, at less than $60 for VectorCad wireframe, we are subsidizing
the hobby. There are however hobby discounts on both the Cad-Cam
wireframe and the 3D surfacing Cad-cam. They are about 1/2 the
normal commercial prices. The rotary option can be added to either,
also at a significant discount. The price is very low and very
stable. The cad-cam is always the latest FULL version, same as the
commercial version.

My signature has links to the hobby discount prices for Vector. The
links change periodically to permit me to meet my obligation to
permanently advertise no retail price less than $795 for Vector Cad-
Cam wireframe.

Fred Smith - IMService
http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/hobby

Discussion Thread

Will 2005-01-19 07:25:46 UTC Solid modeling/Cam R Rogers 2005-01-19 07:41:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam Stephen Wille Padnos 2005-01-19 08:13:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam Robert Campbell 2005-01-19 08:15:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam Will 2005-01-19 10:42:47 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Pete Brown (YahooGroups) 2005-01-19 18:30:23 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam Will 2005-01-20 13:03:50 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Robert Campbell 2005-01-20 13:34:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam Mike Phillips 2005-01-27 07:42:19 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Ted Gregorius 2005-01-27 07:59:28 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam R Rogers 2005-01-27 09:32:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam (no author) 2005-01-27 10:00:07 UTC Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam R Rogers 2005-01-27 10:33:16 UTC Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam Rob Polley 2005-01-27 12:19:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam cnc_4_me 2005-01-27 13:00:53 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Mike Phillips 2005-01-28 09:57:09 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Fred Smith 2005-01-28 10:06:20 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam metlmunchr 2005-01-28 11:13:31 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Alan Marconett 2005-01-28 12:24:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam R Rogers 2005-01-28 16:01:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam Raymond Heckert 2005-01-29 18:51:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam braidmeister 2005-01-29 19:06:50 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Fred Smith 2005-01-31 06:10:54 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam braidmeister 2005-01-31 07:28:35 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Jeff Jones 2005-01-31 08:51:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam Fred Smith 2005-01-31 09:26:02 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Fred Smith 2005-01-31 09:42:01 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam R Rogers 2005-01-31 10:03:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam braidmeister 2005-01-31 10:09:55 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Fred Smith 2005-01-31 13:15:13 UTC Re: Solid modeling/Cam Pete Brown (YahooGroups) 2005-01-31 13:19:55 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam