Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Posted by
Rob Polley
on 2005-01-27 12:19:30 UTC
Hi Mike and Will,
I don't know much about the cam side of things yet,
but it might be worth while to check out
http://www.alibre.com/
they have a parametric solid modeling program that is
pretty good and quite affordable. You can try it free
for 30 days which includes online real time support.
Rob
--- Mike Phillips <mikep_95133@...> wrote:
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I don't know much about the cam side of things yet,
but it might be worth while to check out
http://www.alibre.com/
they have a parametric solid modeling program that is
pretty good and quite affordable. You can try it free
for 30 days which includes online real time support.
Rob
--- Mike Phillips <mikep_95133@...> wrote:
>__________________________________________________
>
> I downloaded the v17 version of Bobcad from their
> site. The sales guy
> calls me and I tell him I'd rather have solids
> modeling in v19 rather
> than wire frame in v17. He tells me that since
> Bobcad just released
> v20, that v19 is not $1500, but is now $600. v19 has
> solids and CAM
> built right in. This all happened last Saturday over
> the phone. Hope
> it helps.
>
> I've used Rhine since it was a beta. Very nice. Wish
> I could justify
> the RhinoCAM's cost. Maybe signing up for a class
> would help.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Will"
> <nmbmxer@y...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I am looking for a Cad/Cam program to use on a
> Shoptask machine, so
> I
> > need both a mill and a lathe module. I was looking
> into Vector, but
> > after using the demo for a couple days, its not
> quite what I was
> > looking for. I've had several years of Autocad in
> college, and I
> find
> > it faster to use when making wireframe 3d models,
> it just doesnt do
> > cam. I also learned featurecam, so thats what I
> tend to compare
> > software to, too bad I'll never be able to afford
> it.
> > Are there any low priced (<$900) cad/cam programs
> that use
> > solid models instead of wireframes? Or should I
> just look into
> > getting a Cam program and using AutoCad to
> generate the surface
> > models?
> > William
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe:
> CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe:
> CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@...
> davemucha@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru
> Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I
> consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group,
> as many of the same members are there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC
> DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT
> ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Discussion Thread
Will
2005-01-19 07:25:46 UTC
Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-19 07:41:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-19 08:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Robert Campbell
2005-01-19 08:15:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Will
2005-01-19 10:42:47 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-01-19 18:30:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Will
2005-01-20 13:03:50 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Robert Campbell
2005-01-20 13:34:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Mike Phillips
2005-01-27 07:42:19 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Ted Gregorius
2005-01-27 07:59:28 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-27 09:32:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
(no author)
2005-01-27 10:00:07 UTC
Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-27 10:33:16 UTC
Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Rob Polley
2005-01-27 12:19:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
cnc_4_me
2005-01-27 13:00:53 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Mike Phillips
2005-01-28 09:57:09 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-28 10:06:20 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
metlmunchr
2005-01-28 11:13:31 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Alan Marconett
2005-01-28 12:24:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-28 16:01:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Raymond Heckert
2005-01-29 18:51:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-29 19:06:50 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 06:10:54 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-31 07:28:35 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Jeff Jones
2005-01-31 08:51:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 09:26:02 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 09:42:01 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-31 10:03:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-31 10:09:55 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 13:15:13 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-01-31 13:19:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam