Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Posted by
braidmeister
on 2005-01-31 10:09:55 UTC
Just wanted to know if what I heard was true, Fred. I wasted $500 on
BobCAD, which is a piece of junk in my opinion.
Now...Don't you think from a customer's perspective that if I wanted
CAD/CAM software, and Vector was an option, that a distinction
between BobCad and Vector be made for customers who A) Heard about
the similar lineage of BobCad and Vector and B) Think that BobCad is
a POS.
Get my point?
Thanks for the clarification ~ now you may have a future customer.
-Brady
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Smith" <imserv@v...>
wrote:
BobCAD, which is a piece of junk in my opinion.
Now...Don't you think from a customer's perspective that if I wanted
CAD/CAM software, and Vector was an option, that a distinction
between BobCad and Vector be made for customers who A) Heard about
the similar lineage of BobCad and Vector and B) Think that BobCad is
a POS.
Get my point?
Thanks for the clarification ~ now you may have a future customer.
-Brady
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Smith" <imserv@v...>
wrote:
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "braidmeister"
> <braidmeister@y...> wrote:
> >
> > But...BobCAD and Vector started with the same code, correct?
> >
> >
>
> 1992 - Centriforce licenses the Fortran source code for Bobcad for
> Dos. Later that year Vector Cad-Cam is released. One of the first
> Windows Cad-Cam programs. It is C based and makes extensive use of
> the Windows API.
>
> 1995 - Bobcad releases a buggy Windows product that relies heavily
> on the legacy Dos user interface.
>
> You tell me, was it the same code? And what is your point?
>
> Fred Smith - IMService
> http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/hobby
Discussion Thread
Will
2005-01-19 07:25:46 UTC
Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-19 07:41:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-19 08:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Robert Campbell
2005-01-19 08:15:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Will
2005-01-19 10:42:47 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-01-19 18:30:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Will
2005-01-20 13:03:50 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Robert Campbell
2005-01-20 13:34:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Mike Phillips
2005-01-27 07:42:19 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Ted Gregorius
2005-01-27 07:59:28 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-27 09:32:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
(no author)
2005-01-27 10:00:07 UTC
Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-27 10:33:16 UTC
Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Rob Polley
2005-01-27 12:19:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
cnc_4_me
2005-01-27 13:00:53 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Mike Phillips
2005-01-28 09:57:09 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-28 10:06:20 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
metlmunchr
2005-01-28 11:13:31 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Alan Marconett
2005-01-28 12:24:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-28 16:01:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Raymond Heckert
2005-01-29 18:51:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-29 19:06:50 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 06:10:54 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-31 07:28:35 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Jeff Jones
2005-01-31 08:51:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 09:26:02 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 09:42:01 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-31 10:03:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-31 10:09:55 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 13:15:13 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-01-31 13:19:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam