Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Posted by
Will
on 2005-01-19 10:42:47 UTC
I've heard a lot of good things about Rhino and Visualmill, but my
problem is two-fold -- visualmill alone is prohibitively expensive
and I won't have lathe support.
I would really like to have a parametric modeling program, but I need
the cam more. What I would like is a Cam program that you can draw
simple models like lathe stuff and 2.5d milling. That is the way
FeatureCam worked, you could import fancy surface models into it, but
you could do an awful lot just in the Cam software. I also need the
software to be fairly intuitive and easy to learn, as the NC machine
is in my father's basement and I want him to be able to use it as
well.
Will
problem is two-fold -- visualmill alone is prohibitively expensive
and I won't have lathe support.
I would really like to have a parametric modeling program, but I need
the cam more. What I would like is a Cam program that you can draw
simple models like lathe stuff and 2.5d milling. That is the way
FeatureCam worked, you could import fancy surface models into it, but
you could do an awful lot just in the Cam software. I also need the
software to be fairly intuitive and easy to learn, as the NC machine
is in my father's basement and I want him to be able to use it as
well.
Will
Discussion Thread
Will
2005-01-19 07:25:46 UTC
Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-19 07:41:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-19 08:13:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Robert Campbell
2005-01-19 08:15:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Solid modeling/Cam
Will
2005-01-19 10:42:47 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-01-19 18:30:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Will
2005-01-20 13:03:50 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Robert Campbell
2005-01-20 13:34:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Mike Phillips
2005-01-27 07:42:19 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Ted Gregorius
2005-01-27 07:59:28 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-27 09:32:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
(no author)
2005-01-27 10:00:07 UTC
Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-27 10:33:16 UTC
Re: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Rob Polley
2005-01-27 12:19:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
cnc_4_me
2005-01-27 13:00:53 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Mike Phillips
2005-01-28 09:57:09 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-28 10:06:20 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
metlmunchr
2005-01-28 11:13:31 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Alan Marconett
2005-01-28 12:24:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-28 16:01:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Raymond Heckert
2005-01-29 18:51:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-29 19:06:50 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 06:10:54 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-31 07:28:35 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Jeff Jones
2005-01-31 08:51:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 09:26:02 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 09:42:01 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
R Rogers
2005-01-31 10:03:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam
braidmeister
2005-01-31 10:09:55 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Fred Smith
2005-01-31 13:15:13 UTC
Re: Solid modeling/Cam
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2005-01-31 13:19:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Solid modeling/Cam