Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Posted by
R Rogers
on 2006-05-03 16:04:22 UTC
Polaraligned <polaraligned@...> wrote:
Towards the end of the shaft the runout varied anywhere from
.002" to .005". This does not seem very good. Maybe you are
better off leaving the pulley bore off center and turning the
pulley to compensate for any shaft run out.
///Naa... Two wrongs don't make a right as they say. Are you sure they have .005" run out? Thats alot for that type of motor. Baldor's are good quality. You should be able to see that much run-out. It's possible the shafts are bent and if they are, I'd find some other motors. But, in retrospect, even a few thou. runout on a timing belt would probably be ok. Also if the indicator is showing that much movement, it's actually half that much in terms of run-out.
///
Can anyone quantify the effect that .005" runout would have
on the accuracy in a mill setting?
What kind of accuracy should I be shooting for as a minimum?
Thank You,
Scott
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> It is always a good idea to bore a pulley out to size if you wantI put a test indicator on a few brand new Baldor servo motors.
> accuracy. Often the supplied bore is quite a long way out. With flanged
> pulleys it is a bit of a drag turning up a fixture so you can hold them
> in the chuck but it is worth doing.
>
> Les
Towards the end of the shaft the runout varied anywhere from
.002" to .005". This does not seem very good. Maybe you are
better off leaving the pulley bore off center and turning the
pulley to compensate for any shaft run out.
///Naa... Two wrongs don't make a right as they say. Are you sure they have .005" run out? Thats alot for that type of motor. Baldor's are good quality. You should be able to see that much run-out. It's possible the shafts are bent and if they are, I'd find some other motors. But, in retrospect, even a few thou. runout on a timing belt would probably be ok. Also if the indicator is showing that much movement, it's actually half that much in terms of run-out.
///
Can anyone quantify the effect that .005" runout would have
on the accuracy in a mill setting?
What kind of accuracy should I be shooting for as a minimum?
Thank You,
Scott
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 04:14:03 UTC
HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Darren Lucke
2006-04-26 05:15:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
turbulatordude
2006-04-26 05:50:49 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Les Newell
2006-04-26 08:38:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
David Bloomfield
2006-04-26 11:45:10 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 16:08:03 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 16:13:42 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 16:23:21 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Les Newell
2006-04-26 23:46:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-27 03:27:31 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
turbulatordude
2006-04-27 05:17:27 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Les Newell
2006-04-27 06:12:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
R Rogers
2006-04-27 06:47:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
lcdpublishing
2006-04-27 07:01:36 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
R Rogers
2006-04-27 07:49:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
lcdpublishing
2006-04-27 10:05:04 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-27 14:21:30 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-27 15:34:16 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-05-03 14:40:24 UTC
Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
R Rogers
2006-05-03 16:04:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 18:23:47 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Les Newell
2006-05-04 01:45:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 03:55:09 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 04:38:52 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
turbulatordude
2006-05-04 08:07:16 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-04 08:35:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-04 08:46:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Les Newell
2006-05-04 11:07:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 11:22:21 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 11:25:56 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
ballendo
2006-05-04 14:54:20 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
R Rogers
2006-05-04 16:28:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-04 22:17:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
ballendo
2006-05-05 01:54:25 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-05 03:21:48 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-05 09:13:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Vince Endter
2006-05-06 08:29:38 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport