Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2006-05-04 22:17:21 UTC
Polaraligned wrote:
nut case.
But, I've seen some pulleys that were about .010" eccentric (.020" total
indicator
reading)! These were brand-new pulleys from McMaster-Carr, I think. I was
apalled, but it didn't matter in this case, as I had to bore them up
quite a bit
anyway. But, I made some centering rings on the lathe so I could spin them
very accurately, and was astonished when I put them in and saw the holes
wobbling by that much!
out of alignment, but otherwise they work just like plain belts. If the
effective
diameter of the pulley is changing, that will introduce errors in the
transmitted
motion. They will work out to a cyclical error every rotation of the
motor, in
this case.
leadscrew
that is a larger diameter. But, if given the chance to buy a pulley
with exactly
the right hub diameter, i might get a smaller hole anyway, because of
the errors.
When they call these parts "precision" they sure don't have machine tool
axes
in mind.
Jon
> >>I am struggling to see if thatIf it was only a few thousandths, it would be no concern except to the
>
>
>>>runout can cause any significant error.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>It certainly will not.
>>No, the tooth engagement doesn't affect accuracy much. And, the .001"
>>eccentricity
>>will have so tiny an effect on your system accuracy as to be only
>>measurable in a
>>metrology lab (6.33 x 10^-5 ")
>>
>>
>
>Thanks Jon. I will not worry about it then.
>I only bring this up because I have seen posts
>about reboring the pulleys because they are
>almost always off a few thousands.
>So there is no need to rebore the pulleys.
>There is no need to return the shafts.
>Life is grand.....
>
>
>
>
nut case.
But, I've seen some pulleys that were about .010" eccentric (.020" total
indicator
reading)! These were brand-new pulleys from McMaster-Carr, I think. I was
apalled, but it didn't matter in this case, as I had to bore them up
quite a bit
anyway. But, I made some centering rings on the lathe so I could spin them
very accurately, and was astonished when I put them in and saw the holes
wobbling by that much!
>>How it would eliminate runout as a source of error, I have no idea.Yes, that is exactly the case. The teeth just keep it from creeping slowly
>>
>>
>
>I do not really understand how an eccentric shaft will cause error.
>I see it as the belt just getting a bit tighter, and a bit looser
>as the pulley goes around. I was thinking it has something to do
>with the tooth engagement. Now I think I understand: The pulley
>is seen as being a larger dia when the error moves the motor pulley
>away from the opposite pulley, and as a smaller diameter when
>the motor pulley is closer to the opposite pulley. Correct me if
>I am wrong.
>
>
>
>
out of alignment, but otherwise they work just like plain belts. If the
effective
diameter of the pulley is changing, that will introduce errors in the
transmitted
motion. They will work out to a cyclical error every rotation of the
motor, in
this case.
>In almost all cases, I need to bore it out, anyway, to fit a shaft or
>Like I said, I only have brought this up because many, including
>yourself, have said you bore out new pulleys to center the shaft
>hole.
>
>
leadscrew
that is a larger diameter. But, if given the chance to buy a pulley
with exactly
the right hub diameter, i might get a smaller hole anyway, because of
the errors.
When they call these parts "precision" they sure don't have machine tool
axes
in mind.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 04:14:03 UTC
HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Darren Lucke
2006-04-26 05:15:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
turbulatordude
2006-04-26 05:50:49 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Les Newell
2006-04-26 08:38:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
David Bloomfield
2006-04-26 11:45:10 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 16:08:03 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 16:13:42 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 16:23:21 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Les Newell
2006-04-26 23:46:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-27 03:27:31 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
turbulatordude
2006-04-27 05:17:27 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Les Newell
2006-04-27 06:12:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
R Rogers
2006-04-27 06:47:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
lcdpublishing
2006-04-27 07:01:36 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
R Rogers
2006-04-27 07:49:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
lcdpublishing
2006-04-27 10:05:04 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-27 14:21:30 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-27 15:34:16 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-05-03 14:40:24 UTC
Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
R Rogers
2006-05-03 16:04:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 18:23:47 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Les Newell
2006-05-04 01:45:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 03:55:09 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 04:38:52 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
turbulatordude
2006-05-04 08:07:16 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-04 08:35:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-04 08:46:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Les Newell
2006-05-04 11:07:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 11:22:21 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 11:25:56 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
ballendo
2006-05-04 14:54:20 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
R Rogers
2006-05-04 16:28:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-04 22:17:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
ballendo
2006-05-05 01:54:25 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-05 03:21:48 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-05 09:13:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Vince Endter
2006-05-06 08:29:38 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport