Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Posted by
R Rogers
on 2006-04-27 07:49:33 UTC
Chris,
The JVM-836 is a bigger mill than a RF. It weighs like 1600 lbs. It's referred to as a "Baby Bridgeport", looks just like one although scaled down a bit and obviously of lesser quality. Still a very good little machine though.
If you have an RF with a round column, I would definitely consider trading up to the RF-45? like Indutrial hobbies sells. With the dovetailed column. The round column is troublesome in that if the head needs to be moved during an operation, X and Y reference are lost. I sold mine on Ebay for $1k. Another problem with it is with heavy cutting, the head can slip radially on the round column. Not good. Having said all that, it made alot of parts as a manual machine.
Dan Mauch/Camtronics sells servos for that size machine. I was going to get these thru him and then the customer didnt want it, then he did, then he bought his own and it was one of those fun deals.
Ron
lcdpublishing <lcdpublishing@...> wrote:
Hi Ron, That Jet 8 X 36, is that comparable in size / capacity to the
bench top Rong fu machines? I am hoping to retrofit mine later this
year. I have some really good servo drives for it and most of the
electricals. I don't have servos or screws yet.
Do you have a suggestion for servo motors for this size machine?
Thanks!
Chris
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The JVM-836 is a bigger mill than a RF. It weighs like 1600 lbs. It's referred to as a "Baby Bridgeport", looks just like one although scaled down a bit and obviously of lesser quality. Still a very good little machine though.
If you have an RF with a round column, I would definitely consider trading up to the RF-45? like Indutrial hobbies sells. With the dovetailed column. The round column is troublesome in that if the head needs to be moved during an operation, X and Y reference are lost. I sold mine on Ebay for $1k. Another problem with it is with heavy cutting, the head can slip radially on the round column. Not good. Having said all that, it made alot of parts as a manual machine.
Dan Mauch/Camtronics sells servos for that size machine. I was going to get these thru him and then the customer didnt want it, then he did, then he bought his own and it was one of those fun deals.
Ron
lcdpublishing <lcdpublishing@...> wrote:
> The JET 8X36 mill I retrofitted with NEMA34 servos (14 lb-in) lastsummer used 15mm HTD belts and there is zero backlash. > Ron
Hi Ron, That Jet 8 X 36, is that comparable in size / capacity to the
bench top Rong fu machines? I am hoping to retrofit mine later this
year. I have some really good servo drives for it and most of the
electricals. I don't have servos or screws yet.
Do you have a suggestion for servo motors for this size machine?
Thanks!
Chris
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
bill
List Mom
List Owner
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 04:14:03 UTC
HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Darren Lucke
2006-04-26 05:15:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
turbulatordude
2006-04-26 05:50:49 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Les Newell
2006-04-26 08:38:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
David Bloomfield
2006-04-26 11:45:10 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 16:08:03 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 16:13:42 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-26 16:23:21 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Les Newell
2006-04-26 23:46:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-27 03:27:31 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
turbulatordude
2006-04-27 05:17:27 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Les Newell
2006-04-27 06:12:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
R Rogers
2006-04-27 06:47:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
lcdpublishing
2006-04-27 07:01:36 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
R Rogers
2006-04-27 07:49:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
lcdpublishing
2006-04-27 10:05:04 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-27 14:21:30 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-04-27 15:34:16 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport
Polaraligned
2006-05-03 14:40:24 UTC
Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
R Rogers
2006-05-03 16:04:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 18:23:47 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Les Newell
2006-05-04 01:45:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 03:55:09 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 04:38:52 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
turbulatordude
2006-05-04 08:07:16 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-04 08:35:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-04 08:46:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Les Newell
2006-05-04 11:07:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 11:22:21 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-04 11:25:56 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
ballendo
2006-05-04 14:54:20 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
R Rogers
2006-05-04 16:28:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-04 22:17:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
ballendo
2006-05-05 01:54:25 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Polaraligned
2006-05-05 03:21:48 UTC
Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Jon Elson
2006-05-05 09:13:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Timing Pulley Accruacy and Servo shaft runout
Vince Endter
2006-05-06 08:29:38 UTC
Re: HTD belts vs GT2 on Bridgeport