CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: New Article Posted

Posted by turyga1963
on 2006-05-08 15:01:10 UTC
John,

I had the same opinion as you until I ran into a bugger of a problem
and tried to get it resolved beyond just soldering in new chips. I
truly wanted to understand what happened, why, and how to avoid it
in the future. The response was simply unsatisfactory in too many
ways. I stand by what I have written. It is true. Hopefully it is an
isolated case that everybody can learn at least something from and
then move on.

In the end, it seems that hobbyist level driver design probably
isn't (with the exception of Gecko) as robust or "simple" as we
would like it to be. After much thought, research and testing, I am
pretty certain that my HobbyCNC board, as well as many others who
have had to replace chips, would not have blown up if I had used an
optoisolated port card right from the start. If the instructions had
so stated, I would have done so. Had Dave sold them in his site, I
would have purchased one.

Optoisolation is certainly a subject we could all pay some attention
to. I bought a board from CNC4PC.com. The first one was a breakout
board only, though I thought it was isolated. Arturo Duncan, the
proprietor of CNC4PC not only allowed me to return the incorrect
card after I had it for a month, but he credited me before I sent it
back to him and I purchased the correct isolated card. Arturo even
drafted up a preliminary wiring design for me to use with my
HobbyCNC board that incorporated his isolator board, safety charge
pump, and index pulse card. Now THAT'S CUSTOMER SERVICE!!!

I know all of these guys put a lot of sweat and tears into the
design and manufacture of their products and I have a lot of respect
for that. Being that this is truly a niche hobby with few
genuine "experts" other than the "horse's mouth", I think it is fair
to assume that a vendor who offers tech support will be ready,
willing and able to provide the utmost in such. I know Gecko does
so. And I know others who do as well.

Finally, as with any industry, those who fail to innovate and those
who fail to care for their customers end up out of business. Look
what happened to the PC manufacturers who gave crappy support or
sold second-rate equipment. Most are long-gone. So if you're selling
CNC hobbyist equipment, don't get pissed off and alienate your
customers...take their criticism and use it to improve your
products, whether that means re-engineering the circuit to include
isolation, or if it means simply providing detailed instructions for
construction, operation, modification, interconnection and
troubleshooting. Don't begrudge your competitors for designs that
are better, cheaper, or cooler than yours...innovate! Surprise your
customers and deliver MORE than they expect. Leave them overwhelmed
by the great products and service and they will tell others about
their experience and bring you more sales and the hobby more
participants, which is good for all of us.

Regards,

Tom



--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "cncnovice" <crcitser@...>
wrote:
>
> Tom,
> You seem (to me) to be not telling the whole truth. Dave Rigotti,
at
> HobbyCNC, has always given excellent advice to his customers, as
> anyone who is a member of the Yahoo HobbyCNC group can testify.
>
> In this "HOBBY,",in my opinion, Dave is equal in rank to Jeff at
> Xylotex, Ballendo at DIY-CNC, Mariss at Gecko, B. Anliker at
> CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO, Bob Campbell at Campbell Designs, and many, many
> others.
>
> Although you are a disatisfied customer of HobbyCNC, you really
have
> no right to stretch the truth about Dave's support to his
customers.
>
> Just my 2¢ worth.¶
>
> List Mom, and moderators, if this message is deemed offensive, and
> not allowed, I will understand, but I think that Dave is getting
> a "BUM RAP' that he doesn't deserve.
>
> Regards to all,
> John Champlain
>

Discussion Thread

Phil Mattison 2006-05-06 10:54:19 UTC New Article Posted lcdpublishing 2006-05-06 14:04:40 UTC Re: New Article Posted Dave Rigotti 2006-05-06 15:12:13 UTC Re: New Article Posted Phil Mattison 2006-05-06 15:16:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Article Posted turbulatordude 2006-05-06 15:55:53 UTC Re: New Article Posted Dave Rigotti 2006-05-06 17:29:17 UTC Re: New Article Posted wanliker@a... 2006-05-06 18:50:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Article Posted ballendo 2006-05-06 20:08:11 UTC Re: New Article Posted ballendo 2006-05-06 20:33:19 UTC missed steps going into sync mode? Re: New Article Posted ballendo 2006-05-07 01:04:56 UTC Re: New Article Posted Dave Rigotti 2006-05-07 04:42:40 UTC Re: New Article Posted Phil Mattison 2006-05-07 10:01:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Article Posted Phil Mattison 2006-05-07 10:28:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Article Posted Phil Mattison 2006-05-07 10:34:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] missed steps going into sync mode? Re: New Article Posted ballendo 2006-05-07 18:03:59 UTC Re: New Article Posted ballendo 2006-05-07 18:15:42 UTC Re: New Article Posted Phil Mattison 2006-05-07 18:41:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Article Posted turyga1963 2006-05-07 21:55:42 UTC Re: New Article Posted turbulatordude 2006-05-07 21:57:23 UTC Re: New Article Posted wanliker@a... 2006-05-07 22:07:37 UTC New Article Posted turyga1963 2006-05-08 00:25:30 UTC Re: New Article Posted ballendo 2006-05-08 03:25:17 UTC Re: New Article Posted Alan Marconett 2006-05-08 08:31:35 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Article Posted jeffalanp 2006-05-08 08:34:47 UTC SLA7062 and Re: New Article Posted turbulatordude 2006-05-08 08:40:12 UTC Re: New Article Posted Codesuidae 2006-05-08 08:50:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] SLA7062 and Re: New Article Posted Codesuidae 2006-05-08 09:08:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Article Posted turbulatordude 2006-05-08 09:15:26 UTC SLA7062 technical stuff wanliker@a... 2006-05-08 10:04:12 UTC New Article Posted cncnovice 2006-05-08 11:04:30 UTC Re: New Article Posted wanliker@a... 2006-05-08 11:16:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Article Posted cncnovice 2006-05-08 11:37:54 UTC Re: New Article Posted Codesuidae 2006-05-08 12:57:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Article Posted turyga1963 2006-05-08 14:13:40 UTC SLA7062 and Re: New Article Posted turyga1963 2006-05-08 14:22:17 UTC Re: SLA7062 technical stuff turyga1963 2006-05-08 14:23:54 UTC SLA7062 and Re: New Article Posted turbulatordude 2006-05-08 14:43:26 UTC Re: New Article Posted - Moderators warning turbulatordude 2006-05-08 14:51:32 UTC Re: SLA7062 technical stuff - supply voltages turyga1963 2006-05-08 15:01:10 UTC Re: New Article Posted turyga1963 2006-05-08 15:16:18 UTC Re: New Article Posted turyga1963 2006-05-08 15:21:01 UTC Re: SLA7062 technical stuff - supply voltages John Dammeyer 2006-05-08 15:29:03 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: SLA7062 technical stuff - supply voltages Paul Kelly 2006-05-08 15:32:39 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: SLA7062 technical stuff - supply voltages R Rogers 2006-05-08 16:07:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: SLA7062 technical stuff turbulatordude 2006-05-08 18:43:15 UTC Re: SLA7062 technical stuff - supply voltages ballendo 2006-05-08 19:48:42 UTC SLA7062 and Re: New Article Posted ballendo 2006-05-08 20:21:07 UTC Sync mode musings was Re: New Article Posted jeffalanp 2006-05-08 20:28:56 UTC SLA7062 and Re: New Article Posted ballendo 2006-05-08 22:38:17 UTC OT SLA7062 and Re: New Article Posted Lester Caine 2006-05-08 23:14:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] SLA7062 and Re: New Article Posted wanliker@a... 2006-05-08 23:24:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] SLA7062 and Re: New Article Posted Mariss Freimanis 2006-05-09 10:11:39 UTC Re: SLA7062 technical stuff - supply voltages turyga1963 2006-05-10 22:50:16 UTC Re: SLA7062 technical stuff - supply voltages Mariss Freimanis 2006-05-11 06:36:52 UTC Re: SLA7062 technical stuff - supply voltages Alan Rothenbush 2006-06-12 12:21:45 UTC Re: SLA7062 technical stuff - supply voltages