Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Posted by
Steve Stallings
on 2006-08-08 19:18:18 UTC
Not exactly sure what you are asking. I have not
seen a frequency rating on steppers. Stepper motors
generally respond in terms of full step equivalents.
That is, torque vs. speed tracks full steps so running
8 microsteps would allow/require 8 times the step rate
into the driver.
Microstepping typically allows the motor to be run
faster. This is because one of the limiting factors
is resonance of the motor. If one were to drive the
motor with a pure sine wave, then the resonance
would happen only at the frequency that matched the
resonant frequency of the motor. When a non-sine
wave drive is applied there is energy at frequencies
other than the main step rate that can excite the
resonance. This is very true for full step modes as
they are a poor approximation of a sine wave. The
more microsteps that the full step is divided into
the less energy is provided at other freqencies. If
you have ever had square waves explained as the sum
of the fundamental and all its odd numbered harmonics
you will recognize the source of the problem.
Regards,
Steve Stallings
www.PMDX.com
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "rllalonde2000"
<alalonde@...> wrote:
seen a frequency rating on steppers. Stepper motors
generally respond in terms of full step equivalents.
That is, torque vs. speed tracks full steps so running
8 microsteps would allow/require 8 times the step rate
into the driver.
Microstepping typically allows the motor to be run
faster. This is because one of the limiting factors
is resonance of the motor. If one were to drive the
motor with a pure sine wave, then the resonance
would happen only at the frequency that matched the
resonant frequency of the motor. When a non-sine
wave drive is applied there is energy at frequencies
other than the main step rate that can excite the
resonance. This is very true for full step modes as
they are a poor approximation of a sine wave. The
more microsteps that the full step is divided into
the less energy is provided at other freqencies. If
you have ever had square waves explained as the sum
of the fundamental and all its odd numbered harmonics
you will recognize the source of the problem.
Regards,
Steve Stallings
www.PMDX.com
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "rllalonde2000"
<alalonde@...> wrote:
>on
> To anyone who may know: Do stepper motors become medium frequency
> motors when microstepping at higher pulse rates?
>
> Put another way, does applying high stepping rates have any bearing
> how the motor itself could be looked at in terms of its frequency
> rating?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Rick L.
>
Discussion Thread
rllalonde2000
2006-08-08 18:59:59 UTC
Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Steve Stallings
2006-08-08 19:18:18 UTC
Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-08 20:49:49 UTC
Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
ballendo
2006-08-08 21:49:27 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 08:19:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-09 09:15:28 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 10:12:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-09 20:13:06 UTC
Re: Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
turbulatordude
2006-08-09 23:29:33 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
ballendo
2006-08-10 03:13:33 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
ballendo
2006-08-10 03:17:51 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 08:02:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 08:15:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-10 08:20:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 08:23:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
turbulatordude
2006-08-10 08:27:53 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
turbulatordude
2006-08-10 08:46:59 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-10 09:13:02 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Steve Stallings
2006-08-10 09:17:41 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Kory Hamzeh
2006-08-10 10:18:26 UTC
Driving the parrallel port in WindowXP
Lester Caine
2006-08-10 10:40:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parrallel port in WindowXP
jzmuda2000
2006-08-10 12:12:37 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 12:15:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 12:56:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-10 13:05:39 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-10 15:53:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Kory Hamzeh
2006-08-10 17:15:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Jon Elson
2006-08-10 18:45:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-10 18:55:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
caudlet
2006-08-10 20:39:33 UTC
Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
turbulatordude
2006-08-10 23:35:26 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Steve Blackmore
2006-08-10 23:51:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
turbulatordude
2006-08-11 00:23:16 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 01:20:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 01:21:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-11 02:54:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Jon Elson
2006-08-11 09:14:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP