Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Posted by
Lester Caine
on 2006-08-11 01:21:36 UTC
caudlet wrote:
still has a lot that needs finishing and only one developer working part
time and the next generation USB controller has been promised for months
now, without appearing :(
Perhaps now is the time to have a look at alternatives, and integrate
them with Mach.
My only incentive to playing with EMC is that it increases the profit
margin drastically on any packaged system I build. I can get the
hardware for 200GBP and load EMC for nothing, or currently I'm looking
at another 200GBP to put a legal copy of Windows and Mach3 on.
Actually its cheaper to buy a small slow tower machine which has
WindowsXP bundled with it and cannibalize it to build the ITX based
system :(
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
> Investigate the Wizard Scripting in MACH3. There is also an SDK forThe momentum on the hardware controllers seems to have wained. The G100
> programmers. It's Windows based and supports pulsing through the
> parallel port, external pulsing via the Gecko G100 and soon a USB
> pulse card. Because of it's popularity and use by a lot of OEM's
> there is a lot of external hardware support as well. It may be fun
> to reinvent the wheel but not ususally very profitable.
still has a lot that needs finishing and only one developer working part
time and the next generation USB controller has been promised for months
now, without appearing :(
Perhaps now is the time to have a look at alternatives, and integrate
them with Mach.
> If your intent is to give the program away in order to sell hardwareThat is probably a realistic viewpoint.
> then EMC might be the best approach. If your intent is to make money
> from the software piece you may find your (paying) marketplace in
> the Linix world limited.
My only incentive to playing with EMC is that it increases the profit
margin drastically on any packaged system I build. I can get the
hardware for 200GBP and load EMC for nothing, or currently I'm looking
at another 200GBP to put a legal copy of Windows and Mach3 on.
Actually its cheaper to buy a small slow tower machine which has
WindowsXP bundled with it and cannibalize it to build the ITX based
system :(
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
Discussion Thread
rllalonde2000
2006-08-08 18:59:59 UTC
Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Steve Stallings
2006-08-08 19:18:18 UTC
Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-08 20:49:49 UTC
Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
ballendo
2006-08-08 21:49:27 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 08:19:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-09 09:15:28 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 10:12:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-09 20:13:06 UTC
Re: Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
turbulatordude
2006-08-09 23:29:33 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
ballendo
2006-08-10 03:13:33 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
ballendo
2006-08-10 03:17:51 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 08:02:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 08:15:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-10 08:20:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 08:23:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
turbulatordude
2006-08-10 08:27:53 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
turbulatordude
2006-08-10 08:46:59 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-10 09:13:02 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Steve Stallings
2006-08-10 09:17:41 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Kory Hamzeh
2006-08-10 10:18:26 UTC
Driving the parrallel port in WindowXP
Lester Caine
2006-08-10 10:40:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parrallel port in WindowXP
jzmuda2000
2006-08-10 12:12:37 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 12:15:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 12:56:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-10 13:05:39 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-10 15:53:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Kory Hamzeh
2006-08-10 17:15:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Jon Elson
2006-08-10 18:45:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-10 18:55:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
caudlet
2006-08-10 20:39:33 UTC
Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
turbulatordude
2006-08-10 23:35:26 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Steve Blackmore
2006-08-10 23:51:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
turbulatordude
2006-08-11 00:23:16 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 01:20:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 01:21:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-11 02:54:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Jon Elson
2006-08-11 09:14:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP