Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parrallel port in WindowXP
Posted by
Lester Caine
on 2006-08-10 10:40:21 UTC
Kory Hamzeh wrote:
and work on your application as a plugin for that. Even then the
parallel port can still be a little flaky.
While DOS is getting long in the tooth, it does still have a place, and
there are some good CAM packages that still use it.
The Linux work is based round EMC - now up to EMC2, and this again
provides a very good base from which to work. The difference between
EMC2 and Mach3 is that you get the full source code with EMC2 and you do
not have to pay any license fees - or for a copy of VisualStudio!
Not sure what you are planning, but I would recommend simply building on
what is already available rather than trying to start from scratch. Then
the choice is between Mach3 or EMC2 ;)
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
> I have a CNC application that I would like to write and I need to decideAllow a year to get the parallel port working on windows - or use Mach3
> it if should be DOS based or Windows. I would like to write it in
> Windows because I want the UI to be graphical, but I do have concerns
> about driving the parallel port reliably and consistently (timing wise).
> Are there any API's, docs, or tricks for this? Another option would be
> Linux, which I have a lot of experience with, but I'm not certain now
> many machinists use Linux for CNC.
and work on your application as a plugin for that. Even then the
parallel port can still be a little flaky.
While DOS is getting long in the tooth, it does still have a place, and
there are some good CAM packages that still use it.
The Linux work is based round EMC - now up to EMC2, and this again
provides a very good base from which to work. The difference between
EMC2 and Mach3 is that you get the full source code with EMC2 and you do
not have to pay any license fees - or for a copy of VisualStudio!
Not sure what you are planning, but I would recommend simply building on
what is already available rather than trying to start from scratch. Then
the choice is between Mach3 or EMC2 ;)
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
Discussion Thread
rllalonde2000
2006-08-08 18:59:59 UTC
Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Steve Stallings
2006-08-08 19:18:18 UTC
Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-08 20:49:49 UTC
Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
ballendo
2006-08-08 21:49:27 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 08:19:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-09 09:15:28 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-09 10:12:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-09 20:13:06 UTC
Re: Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
turbulatordude
2006-08-09 23:29:33 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
ballendo
2006-08-10 03:13:33 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
ballendo
2006-08-10 03:17:51 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 08:02:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 08:15:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-10 08:20:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 08:23:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
turbulatordude
2006-08-10 08:27:53 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Are steppers considered low frequency motors?
turbulatordude
2006-08-10 08:46:59 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-10 09:13:02 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Steve Stallings
2006-08-10 09:17:41 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Kory Hamzeh
2006-08-10 10:18:26 UTC
Driving the parrallel port in WindowXP
Lester Caine
2006-08-10 10:40:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parrallel port in WindowXP
jzmuda2000
2006-08-10 12:12:37 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 12:15:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Alan Marconett
2006-08-10 12:56:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Mariss Freimanis
2006-08-10 13:05:39 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-10 15:53:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Kory Hamzeh
2006-08-10 17:15:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Jon Elson
2006-08-10 18:45:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-10 18:55:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
caudlet
2006-08-10 20:39:33 UTC
Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
turbulatordude
2006-08-10 23:35:26 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Steve Blackmore
2006-08-10 23:51:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
turbulatordude
2006-08-11 00:23:16 UTC
Stepper motor 101 was Re: Lini-stepper
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 01:20:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Lester Caine
2006-08-11 01:21:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-11 02:54:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP
Jon Elson
2006-08-11 09:14:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Driving the parallel port in WindowXP