Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-06-27 20:27:54 UTC
Tom Eldredge wrote:
don't use very much of) and a way of communicating and signalling
multible devices by remapping some of the parallel port signals.
That is the part that I use. There is also a Microsoft spec, which is not
actually a part of the IEEE-1284 spec, that defines how the register-level
access to a 1284 compatible port should appear on a PC. This is what
I used extensively, although it is nearly impossible to decipher the
document. The key was that it pointed me to some motherboard I/O
chips made by SMS. Their documentation had all the details of how to
put (one of their) standard parallel ports into 1284 mode, and make
it work.
provided with Linux that defines the machine instructions for I/O port
access, like inb and outb, and specifies that they be coded inline, without
a call to a subroutine. This allows for the same efficiencies as writing in
assembly language. But, basically, they are the same as peek and poke.
No, it is not a BIOS spec. I actually TRIED to use the BIOS, which definitely
should have supported the protocol, but I couldn't get it to do anything!
Just totally blank. Maybe that was because my device does NOT adhere
to the full protocol, which would have required a CPU in each board.
Jon
> Jon,It is a spec that contains both a communications protocol (which I
>
> I continue to be impressed. I am going to look for a hard disk drive.
>
> Also, could you tell us a little about this 1284 spec?
don't use very much of) and a way of communicating and signalling
multible devices by remapping some of the parallel port signals.
That is the part that I use. There is also a Microsoft spec, which is not
actually a part of the IEEE-1284 spec, that defines how the register-level
access to a 1284 compatible port should appear on a PC. This is what
I used extensively, although it is nearly impossible to decipher the
document. The key was that it pointed me to some motherboard I/O
chips made by SMS. Their documentation had all the details of how to
put (one of their) standard parallel ports into 1284 mode, and make
it work.
> Could the parallelThat's about how I do it in my drivers for EMC. There is an include file
> port be accessed using basic poke and peek commands using this spec? Is it
> not a bios spec? Dumb questions?
provided with Linux that defines the machine instructions for I/O port
access, like inb and outb, and specifies that they be coded inline, without
a call to a subroutine. This allows for the same efficiencies as writing in
assembly language. But, basically, they are the same as peek and poke.
No, it is not a BIOS spec. I actually TRIED to use the BIOS, which definitely
should have supported the protocol, but I couldn't get it to do anything!
Just totally blank. Maybe that was because my device does NOT adhere
to the full protocol, which would have required a CPU in each board.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-25 09:45:32 UTC
Black box again
William Scalione
2001-06-25 11:05:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Dennis Cranston
2001-06-25 11:07:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-25 11:21:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Tim Goldstein
2001-06-25 11:37:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Peter Renolds
2001-06-25 11:55:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-25 12:12:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Tim Goldstein
2001-06-25 12:22:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Chris Stratton
2001-06-25 12:28:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-25 13:30:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
joelulaw@y...
2001-06-25 13:48:13 UTC
Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-25 17:14:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-25 17:19:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-25 17:22:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-25 20:03:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
machines@n...
2001-06-25 22:51:50 UTC
Re: Black box again
machines@n...
2001-06-25 22:56:31 UTC
Re: Black box again
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-26 04:19:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
ballendo@y...
2001-06-26 06:07:01 UTC
Re: Black box again
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-26 06:34:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
joelulaw@y...
2001-06-26 07:21:34 UTC
Re: Black box again
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-26 07:38:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-26 10:59:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-26 11:04:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-26 11:14:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-26 11:33:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-26 12:34:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Ian Wright
2001-06-26 12:38:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-06-26 14:51:15 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-26 19:40:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-26 19:44:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-26 21:57:42 UTC
Re: Black box again
dkowalcz@i...
2001-06-26 23:15:13 UTC
Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-26 23:49:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-27 11:06:46 UTC
Re: Black box again
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-27 11:31:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
JanRwl@A...
2001-06-27 11:35:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-27 11:38:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-27 12:54:34 UTC
Re: Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-27 13:05:07 UTC
Re: Black box again
ballendo@y...
2001-06-27 16:00:20 UTC
Re: Black box again
ballendo@y...
2001-06-27 16:52:28 UTC
fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-27 18:12:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] fire and forget was Re: Black box again
ballendo@y...
2001-06-27 18:45:13 UTC
re:fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-27 19:30:30 UTC
re:fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-27 20:27:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Eric Keller
2001-06-27 20:28:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-27 20:31:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-27 20:53:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-27 23:49:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-28 04:05:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
dkowalcz@i...
2001-06-28 06:41:01 UTC
Re: Black box again
ballendo@y...
2001-06-28 07:53:00 UTC
Re: Black box again
ballendo@y...
2001-06-28 07:59:53 UTC
Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-28 10:54:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-28 11:39:16 UTC
Re: Black box again
Art Fenerty
2001-06-28 11:41:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-06-28 12:31:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Paul
2001-06-28 15:29:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-28 20:12:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Jon Elson
2001-06-28 20:19:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] fire and forget was Re: Black box again
Tom Eldredge
2001-06-29 04:14:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Black box again