CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd

Posted by Smoke
on 2001-07-27 11:14:19 UTC
If Solid works is so good, maybe I should take a look at it. In idea where
I can buy it ...and how much it costs?

Smoke
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Gordon-Gilmore <zephyrus@...>
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>;
CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd


>At 07:37 AM 7/27/2001 -0700, Marcus wrote:
>
>>Last I checked, Solidworks is not much more expensive than Autocad; and
you
>>have to consider that you are investing in your son's EDUCATION!!!
>>
>>Why hobble him with a dinosaur, when the cutting edge is available.
>
>I agree 110%, Marcus. Autocad is nothing more than a glorified electronic
>drafting board. It might be OK for simple, flat parts but for anything of
>real substance it is not worth it. After using Acad for about 8 years (and
>before that VersaCAD--still my favorite 2D program--and Personal Designer)
>we went to Solidworks 3 years ago and have not looked back. There is no
>comparison.
>
>Designing in true solid 3D, being able to rotate the part around in
>realtime, fit it to other parts, have direct output for SLA and CAM
>programs (not to mention designing sheetmetal parts with accurate bend
>reliefs and being able to output flat patterns) put it on a whole higher
>plane of existence. And being able to do more "organic" parts--with lofted
>surfaces truly fairing into flat and radisued walls--is probably the best
>benefit. No more trying to estimate flat projected view of the shape we
>*really* want!
>
>And the drawing package of Solidworks has developed markedly. Automatic
>view generation, importing dimensions (linked with the model both ways!)
>automatically, being able to drag dimensions between views without losing
>their association, projected views from any angle, full and partial
>sections, pre-crosshatched... I'd rather do a part in Solidworks just to
>get the drawing, than do it in Autocad from the start, even for simple
>parts these days!
>
>Best regards,
>
>Randy
>
>Randy Gordon-Gilmore ,----.___________ ______________ _________________
>ProtoTrains // = = === == || == == == = || == == == = == =|
>Rio Vista, CA, USA /-O==O------------o==o------------o==o-----------o==o-'
>zephyrus@... http://www.rickadee.net/~zephyrus
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
>Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
>Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
>URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>bill,
>List Manager
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Discussion Thread

Tom Eldredge 2001-07-26 17:36:34 UTC Comparison of Cadd Carol & Jerry Jankura 2001-07-26 18:25:52 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Smoke 2001-07-26 19:05:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Chris L 2001-07-26 20:12:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Ian Wright 2001-07-27 02:18:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Fitch R. Williams 2001-07-27 06:54:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Marcus & Eva 2001-07-27 07:34:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Smoke 2001-07-27 07:38:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Smoke 2001-07-27 07:58:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Hugh Currin 2001-07-27 09:55:21 UTC Re: Comparison of Cadd Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2001-07-27 11:00:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Smoke 2001-07-27 11:14:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Ian Wright 2001-07-27 11:25:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Craig Chamberlin 2001-07-27 11:48:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd blueveil@e... 2001-07-27 16:21:54 UTC Re: Comparison of Cadd Art Eckstein 2001-07-27 17:45:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd John Craddock 2001-07-27 17:57:58 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2001-07-27 18:21:57 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2001-07-27 18:28:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd John and Cindy Carey 2001-07-27 18:45:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd machines@n... 2001-07-27 20:15:27 UTC Re: Comparison of Cadd Smoke 2001-07-27 20:22:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2001-07-27 22:36:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2001-07-27 22:38:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comparison of Cadd Smoke 2001-07-28 10:11:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd machines@n... 2001-07-28 14:35:04 UTC Re: Comparison of Cadd - Solid edge Origin Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2001-07-28 15:57:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd Scott A. Stephens 2001-07-29 14:47:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd blueveil@e... 2001-07-30 10:05:39 UTC Re: Comparison of Cadd (again) Keith Rumley 2001-07-30 13:55:57 UTC Re: Comparison of Cadd