Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Posted by
Craig Chamberlin
on 2001-07-27 11:48:39 UTC
Greetings,
I use Ashlar's Vellum Solids (which also includes a complete 3D CAD
system and is linked to the model). It is the easiest solids modeling
system to learn that I have encountered. Also, they were the first to
do the track ball thingy, and it runs very well on a 600mhz PIII, and I
had no problems with it on a 233mhz PII.
http://www.ashlar.com
It is intended to design in solids and then move the design to the 3D
CAD system.
It is around $4000 and one of the few available for the Mac.
I love it.
FWIW,
Craig Chamberlin
Ian Wright wrote:
I use Ashlar's Vellum Solids (which also includes a complete 3D CAD
system and is linked to the model). It is the easiest solids modeling
system to learn that I have encountered. Also, they were the first to
do the track ball thingy, and it runs very well on a 600mhz PIII, and I
had no problems with it on a 233mhz PII.
http://www.ashlar.com
It is intended to design in solids and then move the design to the 3D
CAD system.
It is around $4000 and one of the few available for the Mac.
I love it.
FWIW,
Craig Chamberlin
Ian Wright wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Autocad 14 and 2000 does do solid modelling in 3D but not in quite the same
> 'video game' sort of way as other packages. Rhino Cad is another option
> which uses basically Autocad commands and also does 3D solids.
>
> Ian
> --
> Ian W. Wright
> Sheffield UK
> www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marcus & Eva" <implmex@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: 27 July 2001 15:37
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
>
> > Hi Tom:
> >
> > >Autocad is the industry standard and would probably give your lad more
> > >options for future employment<
> >
> > True, true.
> > But what an awful, counterintuitive, unfriendly program to have to
> learn!!!
> > For my money, the way of the future is solid modelling.
> > That means either Pro E or Solidworks. (There are others, but these two
> have
> > dominant market share and are likely to be the de-facto standards of the
> > future)
> >
> > The advantages of solid modelling for any kind of design are many, and
> most
> > serious designers are going this route in order to tap into those
> benefits.
> >
> > An additional benefit of solid modellers, is that the skill set learned
> with
> > one program is far more transferable to another modelling package than the
> > skills learned with a conventional drafting package.
> >
> > With solids, the model construction strategy is the bulk of the skill, and
> > this is useful to know for any other solid modeller.
> >
> > With a program like Autocad, the commands and how to manipulate them
> > efficiently is a far bigger part of what you learn, so a change of CAD
> > package puts you much farther back (to square one) than it does if you
> know
> > how to model in solids.
> >
> > Not only that; a solid model gives you immediate access to a physical
> model
> > via stereolithography, whereas a CAD drawing gives you nothing in that
> > regard, and stereolith is a godsend for those who need a physical model
> but
> > don't have the skills to make one.
> >
> > Last I checked, Solidworks is not much more expensive than Autocad; and
> you
> > have to consider that you are investing in your son's EDUCATION!!!
> >
> > Why hobble him with a dinosaur, when the cutting edge is available.
> >
> > Comments anyone??
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Marcus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> >
> > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> > Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Manager
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
Tom Eldredge
2001-07-26 17:36:34 UTC
Comparison of Cadd
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-07-26 18:25:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Smoke
2001-07-26 19:05:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Chris L
2001-07-26 20:12:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Ian Wright
2001-07-27 02:18:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Fitch R. Williams
2001-07-27 06:54:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Marcus & Eva
2001-07-27 07:34:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Smoke
2001-07-27 07:38:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Smoke
2001-07-27 07:58:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Hugh Currin
2001-07-27 09:55:21 UTC
Re: Comparison of Cadd
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-27 11:00:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Smoke
2001-07-27 11:14:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Ian Wright
2001-07-27 11:25:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Craig Chamberlin
2001-07-27 11:48:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
blueveil@e...
2001-07-27 16:21:54 UTC
Re: Comparison of Cadd
Art Eckstein
2001-07-27 17:45:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
John Craddock
2001-07-27 17:57:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-27 18:21:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-27 18:28:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
John and Cindy Carey
2001-07-27 18:45:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
machines@n...
2001-07-27 20:15:27 UTC
Re: Comparison of Cadd
Smoke
2001-07-27 20:22:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-27 22:36:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-27 22:38:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Comparison of Cadd
Smoke
2001-07-28 10:11:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
machines@n...
2001-07-28 14:35:04 UTC
Re: Comparison of Cadd - Solid edge Origin
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-07-28 15:57:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
Scott A. Stephens
2001-07-29 14:47:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Comparison of Cadd
blueveil@e...
2001-07-30 10:05:39 UTC
Re: Comparison of Cadd (again)
Keith Rumley
2001-07-30 13:55:57 UTC
Re: Comparison of Cadd