Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-03-28 22:25:04 UTC
Scott Hendershot wrote:
set up the appropriate files with root priveledges, as they access physical hardware.
freqmod.o, but can be used with steppermod.o
However, you need to slow down the interrupt service rate. With freqmod.o,
this is PERIOD in the [EMCMOT] section of the .ini file. You would make it a
larger number, in modest increments. For steppermod.o, it is the CYCLE_TIME
parameter, in EACH axis of the [AXIS_n] sections. These are in seconds,
and again, increase it in modest increments. But, this should be evenly divisible
into the TASK_CYCLE_TIME.
EMC is running, what is happening is that the real-time component needs
nearly 100% of the CPU as you have it set, and doesn't leave enough for the
GUI and other tasks. Regular user / root makes no difference in performance.
Jon
> I have more questions about using EMC. When I log in as a user and click on one of icons on the desktop to launch EMC I get the EMC splash screen for a few seconds, then it goes away and nothing else happens. If I start emc.run from a console window I can see that it starts to load up but then I get several messages about permissions and the application fails.You have to be logged in a ROOT, or another acount with system priveledges, or
set up the appropriate files with root priveledges, as they access physical hardware.
> If I log in as root I can run emc.run but the application is slow. The mouse becomes unresponsive for several seconds at a time and the screen updates may take several seconds as well. This machine is a pentium II 233MHz. Does emc just run that slow? Would the performance be acceptable if run as a regular user instead of root?You have a marginal CPU for running EMC with steppers. It is definitely too slow for
freqmod.o, but can be used with steppermod.o
However, you need to slow down the interrupt service rate. With freqmod.o,
this is PERIOD in the [EMCMOT] section of the .ini file. You would make it a
larger number, in modest increments. For steppermod.o, it is the CYCLE_TIME
parameter, in EACH axis of the [AXIS_n] sections. These are in seconds,
and again, increase it in modest increments. But, this should be evenly divisible
into the TASK_CYCLE_TIME.
EMC is running, what is happening is that the real-time component needs
nearly 100% of the CPU as you have it set, and doesn't leave enough for the
GUI and other tasks. Regular user / root makes no difference in performance.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
1999-06-06 17:00:33 UTC
EMC
Fred Proctor
1999-06-09 13:44:23 UTC
EMC
Mo
1999-06-09 19:07:53 UTC
Re: EMC
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-09 23:16:54 UTC
Re: EMC
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-15 20:18:41 UTC
Re: EMC
Dan Falck
1999-06-16 04:07:23 UTC
Re: EMC
Ian W. Wright
1999-07-29 13:03:47 UTC
Re: EMC
chda@x...
1999-10-12 08:48:51 UTC
EMC
batwings@x...
1999-10-12 00:29:11 UTC
Re: EMC
Darrell Gehlsen
1999-10-12 10:08:41 UTC
Re: EMC
Kahl Klemm
1999-11-11 10:16:23 UTC
EMC
Tim Goldstein
1999-11-21 13:05:08 UTC
RE: EMC
Karl Klemm
1999-11-21 17:55:11 UTC
RE: EMC
Tim Goldstein
1999-11-21 18:55:40 UTC
RE: EMC
Karl Klemm
1999-11-22 08:43:09 UTC
RE: EMC
hansw
1999-11-22 08:57:30 UTC
Re: EMC
Tim Goldstein
1999-11-22 09:25:51 UTC
Re: EMC
James Cullins
2000-04-19 17:24:43 UTC
EMC
Tim Goldstein
2000-04-19 19:53:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Dan Mauch
2000-04-20 05:59:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
James Cullins
2000-04-20 06:28:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Tim Goldstein
2000-04-20 06:34:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]DeskNCrt, was: EMC
Chris Salter
2000-08-31 08:07:25 UTC
EMC
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-09 16:45:06 UTC
EMC
ballendo@y...
2000-10-09 20:10:22 UTC
re:EMC
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-10 10:31:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:EMC
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-10 10:55:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:EMC
Jon Elson
2000-10-10 12:02:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:EMC
ballendo@y...
2000-10-10 15:23:51 UTC
Re: re:EMC
Jon Elson
2000-10-10 15:59:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:EMC
ballendo@y...
2000-10-10 16:36:21 UTC
Re: Re: re:EMC
Tom Caudle
2000-10-10 17:04:19 UTC
Re: re:EMC
ballendo@y...
2000-10-10 18:02:34 UTC
RE:re: EMC
Tom Caudle
2000-10-10 18:08:41 UTC
Re: RE:re: EMC
dave engvall
2000-10-10 18:11:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE:re: EMC
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-10 19:15:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:EMC
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-10 19:24:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE:re: EMC
ballendo@y...
2000-10-10 19:27:08 UTC
re:RE: EMC
Tom Caudle
2000-10-10 19:47:22 UTC
Re: re:EMC
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-10 21:44:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:EMC
catboat15@a...
2000-10-11 09:40:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:EMC
ballendo@y...
2000-10-11 20:53:09 UTC
re:Re:rE:RE: EMC
barker1@m...
2000-11-03 05:11:59 UTC
EMC
Dan Falck
2000-11-03 05:29:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Tim Goldstein
2000-11-03 09:10:56 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Jon Elson
2000-11-03 12:08:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Scott Hendershot
2002-03-28 10:48:22 UTC
EMC
j.guenther
2002-03-28 11:11:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Tim Goldstein
2002-03-28 11:13:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Kos
2002-03-28 12:25:40 UTC
Re: EMC
Paul
2002-03-28 12:32:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Scott Hendershot
2002-03-28 14:14:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Tim Goldstein
2002-03-28 15:04:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
William Scalione
2002-03-28 21:43:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Jon Elson
2002-03-28 22:25:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Bill Vance
2002-03-28 23:14:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Darrell Daniels
2002-03-28 23:26:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Darrell Daniels
2002-03-28 23:31:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Gene
2002-05-06 13:10:29 UTC
EMC
Tim Goldstein
2002-05-06 14:39:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Ray Henry
2002-05-06 21:09:41 UTC
Re: EMC
Jon Elson
2002-05-06 22:05:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Gene
2002-05-07 15:18:50 UTC
EMC
Gene
2002-05-09 00:36:24 UTC
EMC
Ian W. Wright
2002-05-09 07:43:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Gene
2002-05-09 10:32:03 UTC
EMC
Jon Elson
2002-05-09 22:30:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Gene
2002-05-26 20:20:00 UTC
EMC
Jon Elson
2002-05-26 23:21:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
IMService
2002-06-06 06:14:50 UTC
Re: EMC
Gene
2002-08-18 16:07:21 UTC
EMC
John Guenther
2002-08-18 19:48:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Jon Elson
2002-08-18 20:34:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
dakota8833
2002-08-23 05:12:23 UTC
EMC
Tom Benedict
2002-08-23 08:15:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Ray Henry
2002-08-23 14:50:49 UTC
Re: EMC
Les Watts
2002-08-23 15:28:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC
Gene
2002-11-18 21:30:53 UTC
EMC
Jon Elson
2002-11-19 21:04:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Gene
2002-11-19 21:16:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-19 21:57:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Matt Shaver
2002-11-19 22:14:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
William Scalione
2002-11-19 23:00:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-19 23:30:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Jon Elson
2002-11-20 10:29:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Yesamazza@a...
2003-02-08 09:09:21 UTC
EMC
William Scalione
2003-02-08 09:34:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC
Vince Negrete
2003-09-15 03:25:04 UTC
EMC
Gene
2004-08-06 16:17:38 UTC
EMC