Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-08-16 22:34:10 UTC
turbulatordude wrote:
The amps are indeed servo amplifiers. Unfortunately, they must be
a custom job, because I couldn't find anything in the M series literature
that looked like your part number. the fact that the motor and amps
have the same part number is pretty odd, and not consistent with the
rest of the Compumotor documentation.
You say you DID download the user manual? Can you point me to
it? I just couldn't find anything that looked close to the M57-102
model number, other than the basic M-series motors.
The problem with this high-end proprietary stuff is that they don't
WANT you to hook it to your PC, at least without a lot of expensive
hardware and software. But, given enough documentation, it may
be possible.
Jon
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "m0nkey0ne" <m0nkey0ne@y...>No, these are pretty expensive brushless servo motors with resolvers.
>wrote:
>
>
>>I have acquired a couple Compumotor motors and amps and downloaded
>>the user manual. However I have no idea how to make my PC with
>>Windows control these motors. Any tips from you guys would be
>>greatly appreciated. I have read many pages and links of CNC
>>material here, but have not exhausted the resource. Posting this
>>plea for help may be quicker or more effective. Thanks.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>It sounds like you have a stepper motor
>and a matching driver
>and a PC
>but no software ?
>
>
>
The amps are indeed servo amplifiers. Unfortunately, they must be
a custom job, because I couldn't find anything in the M series literature
that looked like your part number. the fact that the motor and amps
have the same part number is pretty odd, and not consistent with the
rest of the Compumotor documentation.
You say you DID download the user manual? Can you point me to
it? I just couldn't find anything that looked close to the M57-102
model number, other than the basic M-series motors.
The problem with this high-end proprietary stuff is that they don't
WANT you to hook it to your PC, at least without a lot of expensive
hardware and software. But, given enough documentation, it may
be possible.
Jon
Discussion Thread
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-15 22:38:04 UTC
M57-102 < - - - - > PC
turbulatordude
2003-08-16 09:11:59 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Mon Wan
2003-08-16 19:28:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-16 22:34:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-17 10:57:56 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-17 14:42:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Bob McIlvaine
2003-08-17 17:09:55 UTC
Lindows?
David A. Frantz
2003-08-17 20:20:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?
Matt Shaver
2003-08-17 21:12:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?
Lloyd Leung
2003-08-17 21:27:30 UTC
RE: Lindows?
Tim Goldstein
2003-08-17 21:28:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?
Tim Goldstein
2003-08-17 21:32:00 UTC
Off list: RE: Lindows?
Paul
2003-08-18 11:33:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Lindows?
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-19 09:25:04 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-19 10:38:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-20 09:21:11 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Steven Ciciora
2003-08-20 09:35:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
William Scalione
2003-08-20 17:40:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-22 22:10:10 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-23 12:22:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-27 19:58:15 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-27 22:37:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC