CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC

Posted by m0nkey0ne
on 2003-08-17 10:57:56 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
>
>
> turbulatordude wrote:
>
> >--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "m0nkey0ne"
<m0nkey0ne@y...>
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I have acquired a couple Compumotor motors and amps and
downloaded
> >>the user manual. However I have no idea how to make my PC with
> >>Windows control these motors. Any tips from you guys would be
> >>greatly appreciated. I have read many pages and links of CNC
> >>material here, but have not exhausted the resource. Posting this
> >>plea for help may be quicker or more effective. Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >It sounds like you have a stepper motor
> >and a matching driver
> >and a PC
> >but no software ?
> >
> >
> >
> No, these are pretty expensive brushless servo motors with
resolvers.
> The amps are indeed servo amplifiers. Unfortunately, they must be
> a custom job, because I couldn't find anything in the M series
literature
> that looked like your part number. the fact that the motor and amps
> have the same part number is pretty odd, and not consistent with the
> rest of the Compumotor documentation.
>
> You say you DID download the user manual? Can you point me to
> it? I just couldn't find anything that looked close to the M57-102
> model number, other than the basic M-series motors.
>
> The problem with this high-end proprietary stuff is that they don't
> WANT you to hook it to your PC, at least without a lot of expensive
> hardware and software. But, given enough documentation, it may
> be possible.
>
> Jon

The information I found was in the obsolete section at
http://www.compumotor.com/manuals/literature_user.htm . They had
that particular motor number listed. The information did not tell me
much...more of a user manual rather than installation sheet.
TA Randy

Discussion Thread

m0nkey0ne 2003-08-15 22:38:04 UTC M57-102 < - - - - > PC turbulatordude 2003-08-16 09:11:59 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Mon Wan 2003-08-16 19:28:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-16 22:34:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-17 10:57:56 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-17 14:42:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Bob McIlvaine 2003-08-17 17:09:55 UTC Lindows? David A. Frantz 2003-08-17 20:20:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Matt Shaver 2003-08-17 21:12:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Lloyd Leung 2003-08-17 21:27:30 UTC RE: Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:28:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:32:00 UTC Off list: RE: Lindows? Paul 2003-08-18 11:33:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Lindows? m0nkey0ne 2003-08-19 09:25:04 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-19 10:38:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-20 09:21:11 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Steven Ciciora 2003-08-20 09:35:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC William Scalione 2003-08-20 17:40:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-22 22:10:10 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-23 12:22:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-27 19:58:15 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-27 22:37:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC