Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-08-19 10:38:15 UTC
m0nkey0ne wrote:
to smoothly ramp up the step rate, and then ramp it down at the end of the
move. If it is a 2-axis move, then you need to ramp up both axes in a
coordinated manner, or the line won't be straight.
You would do best to get a CNC program that will support the type of
operation you need.
Jon
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:In theory, yes. But, it gets much more complicated than that, as you need
>
>
>>m0nkey0ne wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>The information I found was in the obsolete section at
>>>http://www.compumotor.com/manuals/literature_user.htm . They had
>>>that particular motor number listed. The information did not tell
>>>
>>>
>me
>
>
>>>much...more of a user manual rather than installation sheet.
>>>TA Randy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>The step/direction inputs are given on Page 17 of that manual.
>>It is a stepper after all. Most confusing that a later series of
>>servo motors alse used the M series designation.
>>
>>Jon
>>
>>
>
>With this information is it just a matter of using a PC to go high
>(or low) for direction and then pulse a certain number of times
>through a designated pin on the parallel port to get the right motor
>to turn the right direction the right amount? If so, I am lacking
>software or program to do this. Can it be done with VB?
>
>
to smoothly ramp up the step rate, and then ramp it down at the end of the
move. If it is a 2-axis move, then you need to ramp up both axes in a
coordinated manner, or the line won't be straight.
You would do best to get a CNC program that will support the type of
operation you need.
Jon
Discussion Thread
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-15 22:38:04 UTC
M57-102 < - - - - > PC
turbulatordude
2003-08-16 09:11:59 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Mon Wan
2003-08-16 19:28:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-16 22:34:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-17 10:57:56 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-17 14:42:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Bob McIlvaine
2003-08-17 17:09:55 UTC
Lindows?
David A. Frantz
2003-08-17 20:20:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?
Matt Shaver
2003-08-17 21:12:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?
Lloyd Leung
2003-08-17 21:27:30 UTC
RE: Lindows?
Tim Goldstein
2003-08-17 21:28:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?
Tim Goldstein
2003-08-17 21:32:00 UTC
Off list: RE: Lindows?
Paul
2003-08-18 11:33:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Lindows?
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-19 09:25:04 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-19 10:38:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-20 09:21:11 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Steven Ciciora
2003-08-20 09:35:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
William Scalione
2003-08-20 17:40:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-22 22:10:10 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-23 12:22:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-27 19:58:15 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-27 22:37:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC