CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC

Posted by m0nkey0ne
on 2003-08-20 09:21:11 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
>
>
> m0nkey0ne wrote:
>
> >--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >>m0nkey0ne wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>The information I found was in the obsolete section at
> >>>http://www.compumotor.com/manuals/literature_user.htm . They
had
> >>>that particular motor number listed. The information did not
tell
> >>>
> >>>
> >me
> >
> >
> >>>much...more of a user manual rather than installation sheet.
> >>>TA Randy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>The step/direction inputs are given on Page 17 of that manual.
> >>It is a stepper after all. Most confusing that a later series of
> >>servo motors alse used the M series designation.
> >>
> >>Jon
> >>
> >>
> >
> >With this information is it just a matter of using a PC to go high
> >(or low) for direction and then pulse a certain number of times
> >through a designated pin on the parallel port to get the right
motor
> >to turn the right direction the right amount? If so, I am lacking
> >software or program to do this. Can it be done with VB?
> >
> >
> In theory, yes. But, it gets much more complicated than that, as
you need
> to smoothly ramp up the step rate, and then ramp it down at the end
of the
> move. If it is a 2-axis move, then you need to ramp up both axes
in a
> coordinated manner, or the line won't be straight.
>
> You would do best to get a CNC program that will support the type of
> operation you need.
>
> Jon

Hence the big bucks for MasterCAM and such. Do you have suggestions?
When all of this comes together it will go on a small mill. Is there
additional hardware needed to connect to the PC? I would expect that
different pins would control different axis's up to a limited number
without additional hardware.

Randy

Discussion Thread

m0nkey0ne 2003-08-15 22:38:04 UTC M57-102 < - - - - > PC turbulatordude 2003-08-16 09:11:59 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Mon Wan 2003-08-16 19:28:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-16 22:34:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-17 10:57:56 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-17 14:42:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Bob McIlvaine 2003-08-17 17:09:55 UTC Lindows? David A. Frantz 2003-08-17 20:20:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Matt Shaver 2003-08-17 21:12:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Lloyd Leung 2003-08-17 21:27:30 UTC RE: Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:28:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:32:00 UTC Off list: RE: Lindows? Paul 2003-08-18 11:33:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Lindows? m0nkey0ne 2003-08-19 09:25:04 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-19 10:38:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-20 09:21:11 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Steven Ciciora 2003-08-20 09:35:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC William Scalione 2003-08-20 17:40:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-22 22:10:10 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-23 12:22:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-27 19:58:15 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-27 22:37:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC