CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC

Posted by m0nkey0ne
on 2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC
I worked at getting the motor turnig today, but to no avail. The
problem you indicate here. I had visions of making the parallel port
control a more powerful source. I have only about 1.5 volts with the
step port high. Looks like I should search for the buffer...
Thanks for all the help
Randy


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "m0nkey0ne" <m0nkey0ne@y...>
wrote:
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Steven Ciciora
> <sciciora@A...> wrote:
> > I didn't look up your model number, but all the CompuMotor stuff
I
> had
> > could not be directly driven from a parallel port. Since the
input
> of my
> > CompuMotor stuff are opto-isolators, my parallel ports couldn't
> drive
> > enough current. I wired up a buffer circuit. After finishing
it,
> I saw
> > the PMX-120 (I think the correct part number) breakout board, and
> almost
> > bought it to replace what I had just finished, it was so nice. I
> would
> > recommend checking this out.
> >
> > - Steven Ciciora
> >
> > ><snip>
> > >Hence the big bucks for MasterCAM and such. Do you have
> suggestions?
> > >When all of this comes together it will go on a small mill. Is
> there
> > >additional hardware needed to connect to the PC? I would expect
> that
> > >different pins would control different axis's up to a limited
> number
> > >without additional hardware.
> > >
> > >Randy

Discussion Thread

m0nkey0ne 2003-08-15 22:38:04 UTC M57-102 < - - - - > PC turbulatordude 2003-08-16 09:11:59 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Mon Wan 2003-08-16 19:28:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-16 22:34:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-17 10:57:56 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-17 14:42:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Bob McIlvaine 2003-08-17 17:09:55 UTC Lindows? David A. Frantz 2003-08-17 20:20:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Matt Shaver 2003-08-17 21:12:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Lloyd Leung 2003-08-17 21:27:30 UTC RE: Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:28:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:32:00 UTC Off list: RE: Lindows? Paul 2003-08-18 11:33:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Lindows? m0nkey0ne 2003-08-19 09:25:04 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-19 10:38:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-20 09:21:11 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Steven Ciciora 2003-08-20 09:35:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC William Scalione 2003-08-20 17:40:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-22 22:10:10 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-23 12:22:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-27 19:58:15 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-27 22:37:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC