Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Posted by
m0nkey0ne
on 2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC
I worked at getting the motor turnig today, but to no avail. The
problem you indicate here. I had visions of making the parallel port
control a more powerful source. I have only about 1.5 volts with the
step port high. Looks like I should search for the buffer...
Thanks for all the help
Randy
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "m0nkey0ne" <m0nkey0ne@y...>
wrote:
problem you indicate here. I had visions of making the parallel port
control a more powerful source. I have only about 1.5 volts with the
step port high. Looks like I should search for the buffer...
Thanks for all the help
Randy
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "m0nkey0ne" <m0nkey0ne@y...>
wrote:
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Steven CicioraI
> <sciciora@A...> wrote:
> > I didn't look up your model number, but all the CompuMotor stuff
> hadinput
> > could not be directly driven from a parallel port. Since the
> of myit,
> > CompuMotor stuff are opto-isolators, my parallel ports couldn't
> drive
> > enough current. I wired up a buffer circuit. After finishing
> I saw
> > the PMX-120 (I think the correct part number) breakout board, and
> almost
> > bought it to replace what I had just finished, it was so nice. I
> would
> > recommend checking this out.
> >
> > - Steven Ciciora
> >
> > ><snip>
> > >Hence the big bucks for MasterCAM and such. Do you have
> suggestions?
> > >When all of this comes together it will go on a small mill. Is
> there
> > >additional hardware needed to connect to the PC? I would expect
> that
> > >different pins would control different axis's up to a limited
> number
> > >without additional hardware.
> > >
> > >Randy
Discussion Thread
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-15 22:38:04 UTC
M57-102 < - - - - > PC
turbulatordude
2003-08-16 09:11:59 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Mon Wan
2003-08-16 19:28:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-16 22:34:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-17 10:57:56 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-17 14:42:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Bob McIlvaine
2003-08-17 17:09:55 UTC
Lindows?
David A. Frantz
2003-08-17 20:20:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?
Matt Shaver
2003-08-17 21:12:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?
Lloyd Leung
2003-08-17 21:27:30 UTC
RE: Lindows?
Tim Goldstein
2003-08-17 21:28:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?
Tim Goldstein
2003-08-17 21:32:00 UTC
Off list: RE: Lindows?
Paul
2003-08-18 11:33:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Lindows?
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-19 09:25:04 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-19 10:38:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-20 09:21:11 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Steven Ciciora
2003-08-20 09:35:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
William Scalione
2003-08-20 17:40:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-22 22:10:10 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-23 12:22:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
m0nkey0ne
2003-08-27 19:58:15 UTC
Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC
Jon Elson
2003-08-27 22:37:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC