CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows?

on 2003-08-17 20:20:12 UTC
Haven't tried it but Lindows is just another version of Linux. You
may have issues with the fact that they try to emulate parts of Windows,
in doing so you do not really know how much things have been modified.
If you intend to use EMC do be advised that much of the developement for
EMC has been done on RedHat systems.

Dave


Bob McIlvaine wrote:

>Has anyone attempted Lindows in a CNC system?
>
>Mac
>
>
>Bob "Mac" McIlvaine
>36 Parker Rd.
>Brookline, NH 03033
>Phone: 603-673-5861
>e-mail: suemac@...
>
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
>Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
>URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
>OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
>If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
>http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
>NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
>bill
>List Mom
>List Owner
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

m0nkey0ne 2003-08-15 22:38:04 UTC M57-102 < - - - - > PC turbulatordude 2003-08-16 09:11:59 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Mon Wan 2003-08-16 19:28:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-16 22:34:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-17 10:57:56 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-17 14:42:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Bob McIlvaine 2003-08-17 17:09:55 UTC Lindows? David A. Frantz 2003-08-17 20:20:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Matt Shaver 2003-08-17 21:12:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Lloyd Leung 2003-08-17 21:27:30 UTC RE: Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:28:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:32:00 UTC Off list: RE: Lindows? Paul 2003-08-18 11:33:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Lindows? m0nkey0ne 2003-08-19 09:25:04 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-19 10:38:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-20 09:21:11 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Steven Ciciora 2003-08-20 09:35:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC William Scalione 2003-08-20 17:40:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-22 22:10:10 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-23 12:22:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-27 19:58:15 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-27 22:37:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC