CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC

Posted by m0nkey0ne
on 2003-08-27 19:58:15 UTC
Jon,
I started a new thread before I found this post from you. By tying
the + to the game port +5V, and switching the - from high to low,
will the combination have enough difference to actually make the
thing move. And would this be from the serial port? It sounds
logical, but just making sure. Thanks, Randy



--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
>
>
> m0nkey0ne wrote:
>
> >I worked at getting the motor turnig today, but to no avail. The
> >problem you indicate here. I had visions of making the parallel
port
> >control a more powerful source. I have only about 1.5 volts with
the
> >step port high. Looks like I should search for the buffer...
> >
> >
> Since this driver gives you access to both terminals of each opto-
coupler,
> you should tie the + input to the +5 V from the computer (game port
pin
> or hard drive power connector) and the - input to the parallel port
pin.
> These chips generally have much more drive capability in the current
> sinking mode.
>
> Jon

Discussion Thread

m0nkey0ne 2003-08-15 22:38:04 UTC M57-102 < - - - - > PC turbulatordude 2003-08-16 09:11:59 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Mon Wan 2003-08-16 19:28:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-16 22:34:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-17 10:57:56 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-17 14:42:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Bob McIlvaine 2003-08-17 17:09:55 UTC Lindows? David A. Frantz 2003-08-17 20:20:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Matt Shaver 2003-08-17 21:12:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Lloyd Leung 2003-08-17 21:27:30 UTC RE: Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:28:22 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lindows? Tim Goldstein 2003-08-17 21:32:00 UTC Off list: RE: Lindows? Paul 2003-08-18 11:33:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Lindows? m0nkey0ne 2003-08-19 09:25:04 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-19 10:38:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-20 09:21:11 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Steven Ciciora 2003-08-20 09:35:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC William Scalione 2003-08-20 17:40:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-22 22:10:10 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-23 00:58:41 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-23 12:22:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC m0nkey0ne 2003-08-27 19:58:15 UTC Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC Jon Elson 2003-08-27 22:37:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: M57-102 < - - - - > PC