Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Posted by
Weyland
on 2003-09-18 08:14:42 UTC
Hey dude,
On Thursday 18 September 2003 10:51 am, turbulatordude spake:
(finally found the schematic for the motors, and was VERY
careful wiring them because I didn't wanna chance blowing
up the Geckos after that last fiasco...)
These were just some notes on my initial impressions.
To note -
I've watched Jeff's video a few times, and while I realize he's using servos,
I'm pretty sure these steppers are more powerful and should be pretty quick.
They're Nema 42's, 635 oz/in.
<stops to look at spec sheet>
Ohhhhhh... crap....
My ignorance and confusion has bitten me in the @ss again...
There's two sheets here, both referring to
my motors, both having differring values.
I'm willing to bet I'm using the wrong one.
One of them specifies 3.5A Unipolar, and 5.0A Bipolar.
So which is which?
Uni=series? Bi=parallel?
Hmmmm....
I'm using a stock BDI-LIVE rc23 on a HP PIII 800Mhz laptop.
What else can I tell you that would help?
Best,
Weyland
On Thursday 18 September 2003 10:51 am, turbulatordude spake:
> If you SERIES wire the motors, then use HALF AMPS.It might come to that. We'll see.
>
> they will be slower, but COLD.
> it sounds like you might have series wired AND used full amps ?No, I'm positive now that I wired them parallel and full amps.
(finally found the schematic for the motors, and was VERY
careful wiring them because I didn't wanna chance blowing
up the Geckos after that last fiasco...)
> I would say to work the machine thru some paces before you startAgreed.
> shooting for high speeds.
These were just some notes on my initial impressions.
To note -
I've watched Jeff's video a few times, and while I realize he's using servos,
I'm pretty sure these steppers are more powerful and should be pretty quick.
They're Nema 42's, 635 oz/in.
<stops to look at spec sheet>
Ohhhhhh... crap....
My ignorance and confusion has bitten me in the @ss again...
There's two sheets here, both referring to
my motors, both having differring values.
I'm willing to bet I'm using the wrong one.
One of them specifies 3.5A Unipolar, and 5.0A Bipolar.
So which is which?
Uni=series? Bi=parallel?
Hmmmm....
> How fast are you stepping/pulsing ?No idea.
I'm using a stock BDI-LIVE rc23 on a HP PIII 800Mhz laptop.
What else can I tell you that would help?
Best,
Weyland
Discussion Thread
Weyland Smith
2003-09-16 21:38:38 UTC
Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-16 22:11:53 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
Weyland
2003-09-16 22:51:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-16 23:07:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
turbulatordude
2003-09-17 05:03:31 UTC
Re: Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
James Cullins
2003-09-17 06:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
James Cullins
2003-09-17 06:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-17 07:53:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
Jon Elson
2003-09-17 10:37:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-09-17 10:39:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-09-17 11:11:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-17 12:08:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
James Cullins
2003-09-17 12:32:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Things to check? Crispy Fried Geckos? No motion...
Weyland
2003-09-17 19:45:49 UTC
Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Jon Elson
2003-09-17 22:31:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-17 22:39:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-18 06:46:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-18 06:59:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
turbulatordude
2003-09-18 07:51:25 UTC
Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-18 08:09:15 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-18 08:14:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Statman Designs, LLC
2003-09-18 08:26:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Jon Elson
2003-09-18 08:41:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
turbulatordude
2003-09-18 08:41:37 UTC
Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Jon Elson
2003-09-18 08:53:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Jon Elson
2003-09-18 08:54:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
turbulatordude
2003-09-18 09:15:51 UTC
Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: - resoulution
sam sokolik
2003-09-18 10:28:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-19 20:57:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-19 21:01:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-19 21:04:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-19 21:11:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-19 21:16:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
JanRwl@A...
2003-09-19 21:19:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-19 21:21:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-19 21:25:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-19 21:34:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-19 21:36:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Antonius J.M. Groothuizen
2003-09-19 22:02:37 UTC
Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-19 22:06:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-19 22:06:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-19 22:06:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-19 22:06:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Jon Elson
2003-09-19 23:52:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
turbulatordude
2003-09-20 07:41:36 UTC
Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? back to basics - please
Weyland
2003-09-20 20:19:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-20 20:43:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-20 21:14:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Jon Elson
2003-09-21 09:26:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-22 09:31:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Jon Elson
2003-09-22 11:14:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-22 11:24:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Jon Elson
2003-09-22 20:46:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!
Weyland
2003-09-22 22:07:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Thanks - was: Things to check? is now: RUNNING~!