Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-08-18 03:13:11 UTC
Gene wrote:
1. the motors have to be well matched to the machine, meaning bigger
than most people
use. I put size 34 motors on a 150-Lb minimill, because I already had
the salvaged
motors. I was using a 49 V power supply.
2. Good stepper drives. The Gecko 201A is a pretty good drive, and
solves a number
of performance problems with other drives.
3. A very smooth train of step pulses, with extremely small variation
in time between
successive pulses, and also smooth acceleration and deceleration.
I demonstrated my Universal Stepper Controller at the 2003 NAMES show,
with it
spinning those size 34 motors at 1440 RPM, which translated to 90 IPM
when it drove
the 16 TPI leadscrews with a 1:1 belt drive.
Part of the trick is the USC produces a train of step pulses far
smoother than any software
ever could, as its step timing can be set with 100 nS granularity. Even
when pushing 48,000
microsteps/second out to the Gecko drive, the resolution was 1 part in
200, or half a percent.
For comparison, using EMC's freqmod step generation scheme with a 16 uS
period, you can't
even generate steps that fast.
Jon
>Sometimes I see people on the list talking about motor speeds in excessIt requires 3 things, I think:
>of 1000 rpm. How is this achieved? I can get nowhere near that.
>
>
1. the motors have to be well matched to the machine, meaning bigger
than most people
use. I put size 34 motors on a 150-Lb minimill, because I already had
the salvaged
motors. I was using a 49 V power supply.
2. Good stepper drives. The Gecko 201A is a pretty good drive, and
solves a number
of performance problems with other drives.
3. A very smooth train of step pulses, with extremely small variation
in time between
successive pulses, and also smooth acceleration and deceleration.
I demonstrated my Universal Stepper Controller at the 2003 NAMES show,
with it
spinning those size 34 motors at 1440 RPM, which translated to 90 IPM
when it drove
the 16 TPI leadscrews with a 1:1 belt drive.
Part of the trick is the USC produces a train of step pulses far
smoother than any software
ever could, as its step timing can be set with 100 nS granularity. Even
when pushing 48,000
microsteps/second out to the Gecko drive, the resolution was 1 part in
200, or half a percent.
For comparison, using EMC's freqmod step generation scheme with a 16 uS
period, you can't
even generate steps that fast.
Jon
Discussion Thread
twil62551@a...
1999-07-03 20:35:46 UTC
Steppers
Ian W. Wright
1999-09-03 14:58:01 UTC
Steppers
DRigotti@a...
1999-09-03 19:38:45 UTC
Re: Steppers
Ian W. Wright
1999-09-04 03:19:53 UTC
Re: Steppers
Dan Mauch
1999-09-04 08:41:30 UTC
Re: Steppers
Charles Hopkins
2000-01-19 09:27:15 UTC
Steppers
Les Watts
2000-01-19 11:24:43 UTC
Re: Steppers
Matt Shaver
2000-01-19 12:09:16 UTC
Re: Steppers
Jon Elson
2000-01-19 21:26:52 UTC
Re: Steppers
Charles Hopkins
2000-01-20 09:03:20 UTC
RE: Steppers
Charles Hopkins
2000-01-20 09:34:08 UTC
RE: Steppers
Matt Shaver
2000-01-20 10:26:34 UTC
Re: Steppers
Matt Shaver
2000-01-20 10:28:41 UTC
Re: Steppers
Bob Campbell
2000-01-20 12:46:07 UTC
Re: Steppers
Harrison, Doug
2000-01-20 11:47:00 UTC
RE: Steppers
Gene
2002-03-31 01:01:22 UTC
Steppers
Ron Thompson
2002-03-31 07:01:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Alan Rothenbush
2002-03-31 07:56:31 UTC
Re: Steppers
JanRwl@A...
2002-03-31 13:21:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-03-31 15:32:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
andrewyslee
2002-03-31 22:39:49 UTC
Re: Steppers
dave_ace_me
2002-04-01 08:52:38 UTC
Steppers on a shaper (was Re: Steppers
Gene
2002-04-01 09:16:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers on a shaper (was Re: Steppers
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-04-01 13:28:54 UTC
Re: Steppers
Gene
2002-04-04 23:49:26 UTC
Steppers
JanRwl@A...
2002-04-05 12:37:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Tim Goldstein
2002-04-06 21:17:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
ballendo
2002-04-13 03:21:53 UTC
Steppers on a shaper (was Re: Steppers
Gene
2002-11-26 01:50:47 UTC
Steppers
caudlet
2002-11-26 08:59:03 UTC
Re: Steppers
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-26 10:40:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Greg Jackson
2002-11-26 18:25:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-26 22:49:40 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Gene
2002-12-02 21:06:12 UTC
Steppers
caudlet
2002-12-03 05:41:25 UTC
Re: Steppers
Gene
2004-05-05 14:12:12 UTC
Steppers
Michael Johnston
2004-05-05 14:26:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Jon Elson
2004-05-05 20:25:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
JanRwl@A...
2004-05-05 20:56:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Michael Johnston
2004-05-05 21:08:40 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Nick Ibbitson
2004-05-07 13:13:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
Gene
2004-08-17 10:57:09 UTC
Steppers
Jon Elson
2004-08-18 03:13:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Steppers
krashking405
2006-07-19 15:22:54 UTC
Steppers