How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
Posted by
Tony Jeffree
on 2006-05-02 22:42:55 UTC
At 00:52 03/05/2006, you wrote:
The problem is that people tend to focus on the motor torque without
understanding the effect that other factors (motor inductance, current
rating, supply voltage, leadscrew pitch, desired acceleration rates, etc.
etc....) will have on the system performance.
I did a very interesting test the other day on my Taig mill.
I bought one of the original Taigs with 140 oz-in motors, rated at 1A/phase
(something like 7 volts to drive that through the 7 Ohm coil resistance) -
it was the first of their mills to be imported to the UK a few years back.
A couple of years later I upgraded to their current 200 oz-in motors -
still 1A/phase, so even higher coil resistance - ~9 Ohm IIRC. I recently
decided to give the mill a makeover, firstly to improve on the drive
coupling and bearing end-float adjustment arrangements (which are
surprisingly bad on the standard mill - my worst axis had about 5 thou
backlash), and secondly to convert from the old "bi-level chopper" drive to
a modern microstepping drive. Having re-vamped the mechanical side to the
point where I can no longer measure any backlash, I decided to see what
maximum step rate I could achieve with three alternative motors, using a
driver capable of unipolar half-stepping at up to 2A/phase and a 24V supply
(actually one of my Divisionmaster units).
The first motor was one of the "standard" 200 oz-in 1A/phase motors. The
max half-step rate with this motor before losing steps was 1250
half-steps/sec, equating to around 9.4 IPM (20 TPI leadscrews).
The second was a 254 oz-in, 2.5A/phase, so with the reduced (2A) drive,
effectively a 211 oz-in motor, so very comparable to the first in holding
torque. This managed 4000 half-steps/sec or 30 IPM.
The third was a 140 oz-in, 3A/phase motor; again, with the reduced drive,
effectively down-rated to 93 oz-in. This managed 7000 half-steps/sec, or
52.5 IPM.
Needless to say, I will be using the 140 oz-in motors for the final
configuration, but will be driving them at their rated 3A/phase and will be
using a ~40V supply and a microstepping drive. If you do the math on what a
motor like that can deliver through a 20 TPI leadscrew, you reach the
conclusion that this combo can quite happily generate a force of around
100-140 Kilos at the tool tip (factoring in leadscrew efficiency and the
dynamic torque the motor can generate). I feel that should be more than
sufficient for a mill the size of the Taig, and certainly, the ability to
do rapids at >50IPM is way more than I will ever need (or will feel is
safe!) on this machine.
Regards,
Tony
>P.S. Still amazes me how quickly what once was acceptable becomesBallendo -
>insufficient; how "testosterone" seems to have invaded DIY-CNC...
>I have machines with 150 oz.in motors going 240 IPM, carrying 3HP
>routers. Sherline's with "only" 116 oz. in. have been making money
>for me for over a decade. Yet many folks now seem to think that if
>you don't have the biggest, fastest...
The problem is that people tend to focus on the motor torque without
understanding the effect that other factors (motor inductance, current
rating, supply voltage, leadscrew pitch, desired acceleration rates, etc.
etc....) will have on the system performance.
I did a very interesting test the other day on my Taig mill.
I bought one of the original Taigs with 140 oz-in motors, rated at 1A/phase
(something like 7 volts to drive that through the 7 Ohm coil resistance) -
it was the first of their mills to be imported to the UK a few years back.
A couple of years later I upgraded to their current 200 oz-in motors -
still 1A/phase, so even higher coil resistance - ~9 Ohm IIRC. I recently
decided to give the mill a makeover, firstly to improve on the drive
coupling and bearing end-float adjustment arrangements (which are
surprisingly bad on the standard mill - my worst axis had about 5 thou
backlash), and secondly to convert from the old "bi-level chopper" drive to
a modern microstepping drive. Having re-vamped the mechanical side to the
point where I can no longer measure any backlash, I decided to see what
maximum step rate I could achieve with three alternative motors, using a
driver capable of unipolar half-stepping at up to 2A/phase and a 24V supply
(actually one of my Divisionmaster units).
The first motor was one of the "standard" 200 oz-in 1A/phase motors. The
max half-step rate with this motor before losing steps was 1250
half-steps/sec, equating to around 9.4 IPM (20 TPI leadscrews).
The second was a 254 oz-in, 2.5A/phase, so with the reduced (2A) drive,
effectively a 211 oz-in motor, so very comparable to the first in holding
torque. This managed 4000 half-steps/sec or 30 IPM.
The third was a 140 oz-in, 3A/phase motor; again, with the reduced drive,
effectively down-rated to 93 oz-in. This managed 7000 half-steps/sec, or
52.5 IPM.
Needless to say, I will be using the 140 oz-in motors for the final
configuration, but will be driving them at their rated 3A/phase and will be
using a ~40V supply and a microstepping drive. If you do the math on what a
motor like that can deliver through a 20 TPI leadscrew, you reach the
conclusion that this combo can quite happily generate a force of around
100-140 Kilos at the tool tip (factoring in leadscrew efficiency and the
dynamic torque the motor can generate). I feel that should be more than
sufficient for a mill the size of the Taig, and certainly, the ability to
do rapids at >50IPM is way more than I will ever need (or will feel is
safe!) on this machine.
Regards,
Tony
Discussion Thread
ballendo
2006-05-01 06:07:54 UTC
COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
John Mickelson
2006-05-01 22:06:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Paul Kelly
2006-05-01 22:22:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-01 22:43:44 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
juan gelt
2006-05-02 03:21:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Graham Stabler
2006-05-02 03:28:47 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-02 04:26:35 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-02 08:38:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
John Mickelson
2006-05-02 10:44:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-02 16:54:22 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Darren Lucke
2006-05-02 17:08:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-02 17:14:14 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-02 18:58:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
John Dammeyer
2006-05-02 19:17:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
turbulatordude
2006-05-02 21:21:55 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Dave Halliday
2006-05-02 21:26:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Tony Jeffree
2006-05-02 22:42:55 UTC
How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
Tony Jeffree
2006-05-02 22:46:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Andrew Werby
2006-05-02 23:07:24 UTC
Re: Re: Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-02 23:33:02 UTC
Re: How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 06:13:26 UTC
Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 06:21:50 UTC
Re: How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 08:20:56 UTC
RE: Stepper questions
Andy Wander
2006-05-03 08:24:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 09:01:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 09:15:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Tony Jeffree
2006-05-03 09:39:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-03 09:42:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Jon Elson
2006-05-03 10:05:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 10:15:12 UTC
Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 10:38:26 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
John Dammeyer
2006-05-03 10:43:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 10:54:30 UTC
Re: Stepper questions
Phil Mattison
2006-05-03 10:58:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 11:22:52 UTC
Re: Stepper questions
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-03 11:48:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 13:24:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 13:31:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 13:46:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 14:05:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 14:08:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
John Dammeyer
2006-05-03 14:47:15 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-03 15:00:40 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
R Rogers
2006-05-03 15:15:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
juan gelt
2006-05-03 15:15:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
ballendo
2006-05-03 16:29:58 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-03 16:46:32 UTC
Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-03 16:48:36 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
ballendo
2006-05-03 16:52:30 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-03 16:52:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
R Rogers
2006-05-03 17:19:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-03 17:41:09 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 18:04:12 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 18:16:44 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 18:29:22 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 18:30:10 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 18:39:26 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 18:54:16 UTC
Re: stepper questions
Jon Elson
2006-05-03 19:20:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Jon Elson
2006-05-03 19:28:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Jon Elson
2006-05-03 19:40:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
jeffalanp
2006-05-03 19:56:40 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
juan gelt
2006-05-03 21:48:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 22:00:36 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 22:46:47 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
JanRwl@A...
2006-05-03 22:51:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 22:58:10 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
juan gelt
2006-05-04 00:01:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
Tony Jeffree
2006-05-04 00:08:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
ballendo
2006-05-04 02:36:42 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-04 02:41:39 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-04 03:20:04 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
Graham Stabler
2006-05-04 03:56:27 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
juan gelt
2006-05-04 04:44:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T.
juan gelt
2006-05-04 04:54:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T.
art
2006-05-04 06:40:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T.
JCullins
2006-05-04 07:07:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T.
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-04 07:14:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
caudlet
2006-05-04 07:43:32 UTC
Re: Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T. {moderator WARNING!}
R Rogers
2006-05-04 07:54:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
jeffalanp
2006-05-04 08:28:48 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
jeffalanp
2006-05-04 09:32:27 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-04 09:57:55 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Aaron
2006-05-05 08:46:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-05 09:48:24 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
wthomas@g...
2006-05-05 10:02:41 UTC
W.E.T. CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] : Stepper speed question