Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T.

actually, graham, i have to ask myself why should
anybody pay ME a royalty EVER once they have purchased
my product or seen my performance.
when i sell something it no longer belongs to me.
if i tell something it is no longer a secret.
nothing can change that. no edicts from vaticans, no
old man in widows weeds with a wooden mallet.
there is no justification whatsoever for any one group
to have a goon squad with guns to stop other ppl from
doing whatever they want to with their own property.
there can be no such a thing as a 'right' to violate
my rights.
study the history of copyright. it was created for
censorship. it NEVER was about paying creators.
A monopoly is a license to prevent other ppl from
doing what some special group wants them not to do.
I'm sorry, man, but institutional thuggery of this
kind is getting the Darwin Award.
Ppl know better. At least everybody i know but a few i
suddenly realise exist here knows better.
and so- hey- sorry i shook your bliss, guys. it really
doesn't matter to me a bit. i'm just not gonna be
investing in magazine publishers or music labels.
Thing is, i don't have to do any mental gymnastics
with myself to get into a comfort zone to download an
mp3. I just do it.
Nor do i feel any obligation to do ad hominem on a
poor fellow who just doesn't know wtf is going on
around him.
every graham stabler i know agrees with me, deep
down...lol
and this isn't CNC!
so done!

--- Graham Stabler <eexgs@...> wrote:

>
> Art didn't have to create Mach but because he did I
> am happy to help
> him make it better with some cash. Its hardly the
> same as Microsoft
> charging huge amounts for a disk they sell millions
> of copies of.
>
> I download some music and I buy some music, Mach is
> an album worth
> having and a band worth supporting AND I can afford
> it.
>
> It is true that software in itself is just some ones
> and zeros,
> copying it does not steal it as such. But if it was
> produced to be
> sold in order to finance its creation in the first
> place and if you
> would have bought it had it been flesh and bones and
> could not be
> copied then you have to ask yourself why you are
> copying it, is it to
> assert your freedom or to be cheap/selfish and to
> allow others to
> finance it.
>
> Graham
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe:
> CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe:
> CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@...
> davemucha@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru
> Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I
> consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group,
> as many of the same members are there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC
> DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT
> ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com