Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
Posted by
Tony Jeffree
on 2006-05-03 09:39:28 UTC
At 14:19 03/05/2006, you wrote:
out pretty easily from the information I gave, as torque is proportional to
Amp-turns, and inductance is proportional to the square of the number of
turns. So if you have a 1A/phase motor and a 2.5A/phase motor that have
roughly the same holding torque, then all other things being equal (same
magnetic materials, construction, etc.), the 1A motor has approx 2.5 times
as many turns in its coils, and therefore approx 6 times the inductance.
Similarly, if you have a 2.5A motor that generates 254 oz-in holding torque
and a 3A motor that generates 140 oz-in holding torque, then the 2.5A motor
probably has twice as many turns in its coils than the 3A motor, and
therefore has roughly 4 times the inductance.
So, keeping the load being driven and the supply voltage the same, it is
actually not very surprising that the motor with the lowest inductance (not
the highest torque) won hands down - with a 24V supply, it was being driven
with an "overdrive" ratio of around 12 times the nominal motor voltage
(~2V), compared with a little over twice the motor voltage in the case of
the 1A motor (~9.5V). If I had been able to vary the supply voltage as
well, to keep the overdrive ratio the same in each case, then the results
would have been very different.
This is basically why there is a place for the "lowly" 2 or 3 Amp driver,
limited to 30 or 40 volts at one end of the scale, and the 7 to 10 Amp
driver with an 80 to 100V supply at the other end of the scale. The former
will do a great job of driving a low inductance size 23 motor; however,
give it a size 34 motor *with the same current rating* and it will drive
the motor just fine as long as you don't expect fast step rates out of it.
So, you have to look at the whole system, not just the motor torque figure,
if you are to stand any chance of predicting how the system will behave.
Regards,
Tony
> >Yes, the motors were incrementally lower inductance - you can figure that
> > The first motor was one of the "standard" 200 oz-in 1A/phase motors.
>The
> > max half-step rate with this motor before losing steps was 1250
> > half-steps/sec, equating to around 9.4 IPM (20 TPI leadscrews).
> >
> > The second was a 254 oz-in, 2.5A/phase, so with the reduced (2A) drive,
> > effectively a 211 oz-in motor, so very comparable to the first in
>holding
> > torque. This managed 4000 half-steps/sec or 30 IPM.
> >
> > The third was a 140 oz-in, 3A/phase motor; again, with the reduced
>drive,
> > effectively down-rated to 93 oz-in. This managed 7000
>half-steps/sec, or
> > 52.5 IPM.
> >
>
>Good imperical data, but one has to ask why the differences ?
>
>were you using incrementally lower inductance motors ?
>
>I have found a dearth of discussion about motors electronical
>parameters as everyone just focuses on the nameplate oz-in.
out pretty easily from the information I gave, as torque is proportional to
Amp-turns, and inductance is proportional to the square of the number of
turns. So if you have a 1A/phase motor and a 2.5A/phase motor that have
roughly the same holding torque, then all other things being equal (same
magnetic materials, construction, etc.), the 1A motor has approx 2.5 times
as many turns in its coils, and therefore approx 6 times the inductance.
Similarly, if you have a 2.5A motor that generates 254 oz-in holding torque
and a 3A motor that generates 140 oz-in holding torque, then the 2.5A motor
probably has twice as many turns in its coils than the 3A motor, and
therefore has roughly 4 times the inductance.
So, keeping the load being driven and the supply voltage the same, it is
actually not very surprising that the motor with the lowest inductance (not
the highest torque) won hands down - with a 24V supply, it was being driven
with an "overdrive" ratio of around 12 times the nominal motor voltage
(~2V), compared with a little over twice the motor voltage in the case of
the 1A motor (~9.5V). If I had been able to vary the supply voltage as
well, to keep the overdrive ratio the same in each case, then the results
would have been very different.
This is basically why there is a place for the "lowly" 2 or 3 Amp driver,
limited to 30 or 40 volts at one end of the scale, and the 7 to 10 Amp
driver with an 80 to 100V supply at the other end of the scale. The former
will do a great job of driving a low inductance size 23 motor; however,
give it a size 34 motor *with the same current rating* and it will drive
the motor just fine as long as you don't expect fast step rates out of it.
So, you have to look at the whole system, not just the motor torque figure,
if you are to stand any chance of predicting how the system will behave.
Regards,
Tony
Discussion Thread
ballendo
2006-05-01 06:07:54 UTC
COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
John Mickelson
2006-05-01 22:06:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Paul Kelly
2006-05-01 22:22:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-01 22:43:44 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
juan gelt
2006-05-02 03:21:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Graham Stabler
2006-05-02 03:28:47 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-02 04:26:35 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-02 08:38:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
John Mickelson
2006-05-02 10:44:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-02 16:54:22 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Darren Lucke
2006-05-02 17:08:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-02 17:14:14 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-02 18:58:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
John Dammeyer
2006-05-02 19:17:47 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
turbulatordude
2006-05-02 21:21:55 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Dave Halliday
2006-05-02 21:26:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Tony Jeffree
2006-05-02 22:42:55 UTC
How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
Tony Jeffree
2006-05-02 22:46:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Andrew Werby
2006-05-02 23:07:24 UTC
Re: Re: Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
ballendo
2006-05-02 23:33:02 UTC
Re: How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 06:13:26 UTC
Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 06:21:50 UTC
Re: How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 08:20:56 UTC
RE: Stepper questions
Andy Wander
2006-05-03 08:24:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 09:01:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 09:15:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Tony Jeffree
2006-05-03 09:39:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How much torque is enough? (Was: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC...)
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-03 09:42:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Jon Elson
2006-05-03 10:05:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 10:15:12 UTC
Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 10:38:26 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
John Dammeyer
2006-05-03 10:43:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 10:54:30 UTC
Re: Stepper questions
Phil Mattison
2006-05-03 10:58:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 11:22:52 UTC
Re: Stepper questions
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-03 11:48:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 13:24:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 13:31:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 13:46:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 14:05:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 14:08:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
John Dammeyer
2006-05-03 14:47:15 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-03 15:00:40 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
R Rogers
2006-05-03 15:15:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
juan gelt
2006-05-03 15:15:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
ballendo
2006-05-03 16:29:58 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-03 16:46:32 UTC
Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-03 16:48:36 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
ballendo
2006-05-03 16:52:30 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-03 16:52:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
R Rogers
2006-05-03 17:19:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-03 17:41:09 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 18:04:12 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 18:16:44 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 18:29:22 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 18:30:10 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
turbulatordude
2006-05-03 18:39:26 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Alan Marconett
2006-05-03 18:54:16 UTC
Re: stepper questions
Jon Elson
2006-05-03 19:20:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Jon Elson
2006-05-03 19:28:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
Jon Elson
2006-05-03 19:40:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Stepper questions
jeffalanp
2006-05-03 19:56:40 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
juan gelt
2006-05-03 21:48:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 22:00:36 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 22:46:47 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
JanRwl@A...
2006-05-03 22:51:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-03 22:58:10 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
juan gelt
2006-05-04 00:01:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
Tony Jeffree
2006-05-04 00:08:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
ballendo
2006-05-04 02:36:42 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-04 02:41:39 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
ballendo
2006-05-04 03:20:04 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
Graham Stabler
2006-05-04 03:56:27 UTC
Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
juan gelt
2006-05-04 04:44:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T.
juan gelt
2006-05-04 04:54:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T.
art
2006-05-04 06:40:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T.
JCullins
2006-05-04 07:07:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T.
Wayne Weedon
2006-05-04 07:14:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
caudlet
2006-05-04 07:43:32 UTC
Re: Almost plug-n-play??? going O.T. {moderator WARNING!}
R Rogers
2006-05-04 07:54:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Almost plug-n-play??? was Re: Steppers, bi- vs uni ?? who cares ?
jeffalanp
2006-05-04 08:28:48 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
jeffalanp
2006-05-04 09:32:27 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-04 09:57:55 UTC
The best stepper driver??? was Re: Stepper questions
Aaron
2006-05-05 08:46:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
Mariss Freimanis
2006-05-05 09:48:24 UTC
Re: COMPLETE 3 axis CNC electronics package (plug-n-cut, ready to go)
wthomas@g...
2006-05-05 10:02:41 UTC
W.E.T. CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] : Stepper speed question