Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Posted by
Stephen Wille Padnos
on 2006-06-21 06:14:05 UTC
John Stevenson wrote:
motion (aka threading). There have been a number of improvements in
this area recently, started in the month or two before the CNC workshop,
and still continuing.
development is called the "Kramer doc", it's the original NIST
specification for the RS-274NGC language (otherwise known as G-code).
The definition for A,B, and C axes is that if there's a move that
includes both linear and rotary motion, then the feedrate (F word)
defines the tooltip velocity in XYZ, and the ABC motions are set so that
they complete at the same time as the XYZ. It's effectively gearing of
the rotary axes to the cartesian move. Not much else can be done
without knowing the construction of the machine (ie, does the head tilt
or does the work tilt?)
Windows or Linux based ...
-Steve
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Lester Caine <lester@...> wrote:Yes. EMC2 runs lathes quite nicely, complete with spindle-synchronized
>
>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>Lester,
>Can EMC2 run a lathe as yet ?
>
>
motion (aka threading). There have been a number of improvements in
this area recently, started in the month or two before the CNC workshop,
and still continuing.
>Also with the original EMC there was an issue with 4th axis control,Full 6-axis control works fine with EMC2. The spec used for EMC2
>When Art ported the EMC core over to Mach2 the 4tha xis didn't work
>correctly.
>
>
development is called the "Kramer doc", it's the original NIST
specification for the RS-274NGC language (otherwise known as G-code).
The definition for A,B, and C axes is that if there's a move that
includes both linear and rotary motion, then the feedrate (F word)
defines the tooltip velocity in XYZ, and the ABC motions are set so that
they complete at the same time as the XYZ. It's effectively gearing of
the rotary axes to the cartesian move. Not much else can be done
without knowing the construction of the machine (ie, does the head tilt
or does the work tilt?)
>It took Art about 4 goes to get this running.That can be said for alomst all software - open or closed source,
>has this been fixed? I ask because you may not be aware of it.
>many don't use all the features in a package and assume that because
>they are there, they work.
>
>
Windows or Linux based ...
>John S.Hope this helps.
>
-Steve
Discussion Thread
Erick
2006-06-18 21:38:48 UTC
EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Lester Caine
2006-06-18 23:49:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Erick
2006-06-19 07:43:44 UTC
Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Peter Homann
2006-06-19 14:59:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Lester Caine
2006-06-19 16:07:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Erick
2006-06-19 21:56:31 UTC
Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Erick
2006-06-19 21:57:48 UTC
Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
vavaroutsos
2006-06-19 23:33:14 UTC
Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Tony Jeffree
2006-06-19 23:52:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Lester Caine
2006-06-19 23:58:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
David A. Frantz
2006-06-20 07:31:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Tony Jeffree
2006-06-20 07:44:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
John Stevenson
2006-06-20 08:24:10 UTC
Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
cncboat
2006-06-20 08:28:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC sw model WAS re: and Taig w/ MicroProto
Lester Caine
2006-06-20 08:48:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Tony Jeffree
2006-06-20 08:53:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
R Rogers
2006-06-20 09:03:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Mike Delany
2006-06-20 09:04:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Roy J. Tellason
2006-06-20 09:10:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Lester Caine
2006-06-20 09:13:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
vavaroutsos
2006-06-20 10:27:11 UTC
Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Lester Caine
2006-06-20 11:30:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Lester Caine
2006-06-20 23:42:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
John Stevenson
2006-06-21 00:33:10 UTC
Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
John Stevenson
2006-06-21 00:45:20 UTC
Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Lester Caine
2006-06-21 00:56:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
John Stevenson
2006-06-21 01:18:02 UTC
Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Lester Caine
2006-06-21 01:46:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Stephen Wille Padnos
2006-06-21 06:14:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Stephen Wille Padnos
2006-06-21 06:28:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
art
2006-06-21 07:36:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Jon Elson
2006-06-21 09:52:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto
Alan Marconett
2006-06-21 11:09:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EMC and Taig w/ MicroProto