Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
Posted by
Stephen Wille Padnos
on 2006-06-24 09:47:18 UTC
He's saying that the output from the buck transformer should be
connected on the *primary* of the larger transformer, to reduce the
input voltage by roughly 10%.
In that case, 4A in the primary of the main transformer (and the
secondary of the buck transformer) would allow roughly 440W at the
secondary (I think he forgot to subtract the 12V from the input voltage,
so it's 4 * 108 = 436W)
This will reduce the final output voltage by only about 6V, rather than
a 12V reduction if it were on the secondary.
- Steve
Peter Reilley wrote:
connected on the *primary* of the larger transformer, to reduce the
input voltage by roughly 10%.
In that case, 4A in the primary of the main transformer (and the
secondary of the buck transformer) would allow roughly 440W at the
secondary (I think he forgot to subtract the 12V from the input voltage,
so it's 4 * 108 = 436W)
This will reduce the final output voltage by only about 6V, rather than
a 12V reduction if it were on the secondary.
- Steve
Peter Reilley wrote:
>A .05 KVA transformer that is driving a perfectly
>resistive load is capable of supplying 50 Watts.
>There is no getting around that 50 Watt limit.
>Volt-Amps (VA) is the same as Watts for a
>resistive load.
>
>This transformer can supply about 4 Amps at
>12 volts or about 2 Amps at 24 volts. It will
>draw about .4 Amps if the primary is wired
>for 120 Volts or about .2 Amps at 240 Volts.
>
>>From this it can be deduced that the wire used
>in each of the two secondaries is capable of carrying
>about 2 Amps. The wire in each of the two
>primary windings is capable of carrying .2 Amps.
>You cannot exceed these current limits without burning
>up the transformer.
>
>Pete.
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "David Speck" <Dave@...>
>To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:49 AM
>Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
>
>
>
>
>>Peter,
>>
>>It's true that the buck transformer is rated at 4 amps, but if applied
>>to the primary side of the power circuit as is usually practiced, then
>>that means you would be drawing 4 amps through the 120 volt primary, or
>>delivering about 480 watts to the secondary of the original
>>transformer. The original enquirer didn't spec the size of the original
>>transformer, but 480 watts sounds like a reasonable initial guess.
>>
>>Dave
>>
>>Peter Reilley wrote:
>>
>>
>>>That transformer is not adequate.
>>>It is spec'ed as .05KVA. That means that it is good
>>>for about 4 Amps when wired for 12 Volts.
>>>
>>>Pete.
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "David Speck" <Dave@...>
>>>To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
>>>Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 10:39 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>This buck / boost transformer would do the job for $29.99 w/ $10.00
>>>>shipping on eBay's "Buy it Now"
>>>>
>>>>Dave
>>>>
>>>>GE BUCK BOOST TRANSFORMER CATALOG# 9T51B0102 Item number: 3853854254
>>>>
>>>>====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====
>>>>
>>>>Robert Campbell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Tony,
>>>>>
>>>>>I am with you. PartsExpress has transformers for about $70 which are
>>>>>affordable.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
>Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
>URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
>OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
>If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
>http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
>NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
>bill
>List Mom
>List Owner
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
pkranger63@y...
2001-11-23 18:04:55 UTC
Power supply
Bob Campbell
2001-11-23 18:20:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
shymu@b...
2001-11-23 18:52:44 UTC
Re: Power supply
shymu@b...
2001-11-23 19:31:37 UTC
Re: Power supply
Bill Vance
2001-11-23 22:58:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
High Tech
2001-11-24 08:52:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
Bill Vance
2002-04-19 11:42:57 UTC
Power supply
mariss92705
2002-04-19 12:31:28 UTC
Re: Power supply
workaholic_ro
2002-04-19 14:48:59 UTC
Re: Power supply
mariss92705
2002-04-19 19:42:33 UTC
Re: Power supply
Raymond Heckert
2002-06-23 13:34:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-23 15:57:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
krashking405
2006-05-28 16:26:37 UTC
Power supply
caudlet
2006-05-29 08:12:33 UTC
Re: Power supply
krashking405
2006-05-29 16:42:34 UTC
Re: Power supply
Abby Katt
2006-05-30 04:36:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
ballendo
2006-05-30 05:40:35 UTC
Re: Power supply
Graham Stabler
2006-05-30 07:25:37 UTC
Re: Power supply
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-30 08:09:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
Roy J. Tellason
2006-05-30 08:16:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
Mina Aboul Saad
2006-06-24 04:11:52 UTC
Power supply
Lester Caine
2006-06-24 04:48:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
Abby Katt
2006-06-24 05:02:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
Peter Reilley
2006-06-24 05:22:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
Larry Bush
2006-06-24 05:32:54 UTC
Re: Power supply
Tony Jeffree
2006-06-24 05:49:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
David Speck
2006-06-24 06:40:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
Robert Renfro
2006-06-24 07:26:09 UTC
Re: Power supply
Robert Campbell
2006-06-24 07:26:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
Thea xxxxx
2006-06-24 07:26:56 UTC
AW: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
David Speck
2006-06-24 07:37:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
Peter Reilley
2006-06-24 07:58:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
David Speck
2006-06-24 08:47:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
Peter Reilley
2006-06-24 09:38:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
Stephen Wille Padnos
2006-06-24 09:47:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
turbulatordude
2006-06-24 10:28:46 UTC
Re: Power supply
Peter Reilley
2006-06-24 11:12:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
David Speck
2006-06-24 12:34:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
Peter Reilley
2006-06-24 13:44:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
Dave Halliday
2006-06-24 18:59:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
Raymond Heckert
2006-06-25 18:12:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
Jon Elson
2006-06-25 22:19:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
Jack Mc Kie
2008-06-11 07:58:00 UTC
Power supply
JCullins
2008-06-11 10:22:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
Jon Elson
2008-06-11 10:25:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
David G. LeVine
2008-06-13 09:39:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply
caudlet
2008-06-13 11:03:45 UTC
Re: Power supply