CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply

Posted by Peter Reilley
on 2006-06-24 11:12:46 UTC
If that is what he was saying then I agree.

Pete.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Wille Padnos" <spadnos@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply


> He's saying that the output from the buck transformer should be
> connected on the *primary* of the larger transformer, to reduce the
> input voltage by roughly 10%.
>
> In that case, 4A in the primary of the main transformer (and the
> secondary of the buck transformer) would allow roughly 440W at the
> secondary (I think he forgot to subtract the 12V from the input voltage,
> so it's 4 * 108 = 436W)
>
> This will reduce the final output voltage by only about 6V, rather than
> a 12V reduction if it were on the secondary.
>
> - Steve
>
> Peter Reilley wrote:
>
>>A .05 KVA transformer that is driving a perfectly
>>resistive load is capable of supplying 50 Watts.
>>There is no getting around that 50 Watt limit.
>>Volt-Amps (VA) is the same as Watts for a
>>resistive load.
>>
>>This transformer can supply about 4 Amps at
>>12 volts or about 2 Amps at 24 volts. It will
>>draw about .4 Amps if the primary is wired
>>for 120 Volts or about .2 Amps at 240 Volts.
>>
>>>From this it can be deduced that the wire used
>>in each of the two secondaries is capable of carrying
>>about 2 Amps. The wire in each of the two
>>primary windings is capable of carrying .2 Amps.
>>You cannot exceed these current limits without burning
>>up the transformer.
>>
>>Pete.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "David Speck" <Dave@...>
>>To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
>>Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:49 AM
>>Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Peter,
>>>
>>>It's true that the buck transformer is rated at 4 amps, but if applied
>>>to the primary side of the power circuit as is usually practiced, then
>>>that means you would be drawing 4 amps through the 120 volt primary, or
>>>delivering about 480 watts to the secondary of the original
>>>transformer. The original enquirer didn't spec the size of the original
>>>transformer, but 480 watts sounds like a reasonable initial guess.
>>>
>>>Dave
>>>
>>>Peter Reilley wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>That transformer is not adequate.
>>>>It is spec'ed as .05KVA. That means that it is good
>>>>for about 4 Amps when wired for 12 Volts.
>>>>
>>>>Pete.
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "David Speck" <Dave@...>
>>>>To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
>>>>Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 10:39 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>This buck / boost transformer would do the job for $29.99 w/ $10.00
>>>>>shipping on eBay's "Buy it Now"
>>>>>
>>>>>Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>GE BUCK BOOST TRANSFORMER CATALOG# 9T51B0102 Item number: 3853854254
>>>>>
>>>>>====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====
>>>>>
>>>>>Robert Campbell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Tony,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I am with you. PartsExpress has transformers for about $70 which are
>>>>>>affordable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Addresses:
>>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>>Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>>
>>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
>>timg@...
>>Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
>>[Moderators]
>>URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>>
>>OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
>>If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
>>aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it
>>if you have trouble.
>>http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>>
>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
>>sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for
>>OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>>
>>NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
>>DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
>>bill
>>List Mom
>>List Owner
>>
>>
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Discussion Thread

pkranger63@y... 2001-11-23 18:04:55 UTC Power supply Bob Campbell 2001-11-23 18:20:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply shymu@b... 2001-11-23 18:52:44 UTC Re: Power supply shymu@b... 2001-11-23 19:31:37 UTC Re: Power supply Bill Vance 2001-11-23 22:58:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply High Tech 2001-11-24 08:52:14 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply Bill Vance 2002-04-19 11:42:57 UTC Power supply mariss92705 2002-04-19 12:31:28 UTC Re: Power supply workaholic_ro 2002-04-19 14:48:59 UTC Re: Power supply mariss92705 2002-04-19 19:42:33 UTC Re: Power supply Raymond Heckert 2002-06-23 13:34:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply JanRwl@A... 2002-06-23 15:57:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply krashking405 2006-05-28 16:26:37 UTC Power supply caudlet 2006-05-29 08:12:33 UTC Re: Power supply krashking405 2006-05-29 16:42:34 UTC Re: Power supply Abby Katt 2006-05-30 04:36:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply ballendo 2006-05-30 05:40:35 UTC Re: Power supply Graham Stabler 2006-05-30 07:25:37 UTC Re: Power supply Roy J. Tellason 2006-05-30 08:09:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply Roy J. Tellason 2006-05-30 08:16:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply Mina Aboul Saad 2006-06-24 04:11:52 UTC Power supply Lester Caine 2006-06-24 04:48:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply Abby Katt 2006-06-24 05:02:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply Peter Reilley 2006-06-24 05:22:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply Larry Bush 2006-06-24 05:32:54 UTC Re: Power supply Tony Jeffree 2006-06-24 05:49:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply David Speck 2006-06-24 06:40:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply Robert Renfro 2006-06-24 07:26:09 UTC Re: Power supply Robert Campbell 2006-06-24 07:26:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply Thea xxxxx 2006-06-24 07:26:56 UTC AW: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply David Speck 2006-06-24 07:37:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply Peter Reilley 2006-06-24 07:58:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply David Speck 2006-06-24 08:47:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply Peter Reilley 2006-06-24 09:38:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply Stephen Wille Padnos 2006-06-24 09:47:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply turbulatordude 2006-06-24 10:28:46 UTC Re: Power supply Peter Reilley 2006-06-24 11:12:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply David Speck 2006-06-24 12:34:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply Peter Reilley 2006-06-24 13:44:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Power supply Dave Halliday 2006-06-24 18:59:21 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply Raymond Heckert 2006-06-25 18:12:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply Jon Elson 2006-06-25 22:19:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply Jack Mc Kie 2008-06-11 07:58:00 UTC Power supply JCullins 2008-06-11 10:22:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply Jon Elson 2008-06-11 10:25:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply David G. LeVine 2008-06-13 09:39:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Power supply caudlet 2008-06-13 11:03:45 UTC Re: Power supply