Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-09-28 12:01:22 UTC
Carlos Guillermo wrote:
was designed
from the ground up for complete isolation, then it is merely dangerous.
If it was not designed for it, you will have to isolate EVERY signal
from
the servo amp to anything else, such as the encoder, commands from the
computer, fault signals to the computer, etc. The transformers are NOT
that expensive! They are laying all over the place - these are called
'control transformers' or 'step-down' transformers, and are used all
over the
place in industrial plants to convert 440 V to 240 V, or 240 V to 110 V
to run solenoids, light bulbs, annunciator panels and all sorts of
control
gear off the main feed to machine tools, air conditioners, blowers, etc.
They have terminals labeled H1 to H4 and X1 to X4, generally, and are
rated in KVA.
Jon
> Hmmm... 160-180 VDC input? I'd be real tempted to take full-bridgeIt depends entirely on what circuitry is in the drive control. If it
> rectified and filtered 120VAC (120 x 1.41 = 169.2) and skip the
> expensive transformer. I know this can be dangerous being
> non-isolated from the mains, but can this be done safely with
> proper implementation?
was designed
from the ground up for complete isolation, then it is merely dangerous.
If it was not designed for it, you will have to isolate EVERY signal
from
the servo amp to anything else, such as the encoder, commands from the
computer, fault signals to the computer, etc. The transformers are NOT
that expensive! They are laying all over the place - these are called
'control transformers' or 'step-down' transformers, and are used all
over the
place in industrial plants to convert 440 V to 240 V, or 240 V to 110 V
to run solenoids, light bulbs, annunciator panels and all sorts of
control
gear off the main feed to machine tools, air conditioners, blowers, etc.
They have terminals labeled H1 to H4 and X1 to X4, generally, and are
rated in KVA.
Jon
Discussion Thread
John Stevenson
2000-09-27 13:35:37 UTC
201 Drivers and 42 Motors
Mariss Freimanis
2000-09-27 21:35:27 UTC
Re: 201 Drivers and 42 Motors
Lee & Chris studley
2000-09-28 08:43:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 201 Drivers and 42 Motors
Carlos Guillermo
2000-09-28 09:27:04 UTC
Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
cnc002@a...
2000-09-28 10:19:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Jon Elson
2000-09-28 12:01:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Doug Harrison
2000-09-28 13:25:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 201 Drivers and 42 Motors
Carlos Guillermo
2000-09-28 15:07:35 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Jon Elson
2000-09-28 20:17:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Mariss Freimanis
2000-09-28 20:29:13 UTC
Re: Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
JanRwl@A...
2000-09-28 21:00:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Matt Shaver
2000-09-28 21:43:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Jon Elson
2000-09-28 23:26:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Jon Elson
2000-09-28 23:29:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
machines@n...
2000-09-29 00:43:57 UTC
Re: 201 Drivers and 42 Motors
Mariss Freimanis
2000-09-29 08:19:04 UTC
Re: 201 Drivers and 42 Motors
Lee & Chris studley
2000-09-29 08:28:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Lee & Chris studley
2000-09-29 08:39:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 201 Drivers and 42 Motors
Robert Bachman
2000-09-29 12:13:30 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Isolation Transformer Suggestion
machines@n...
2000-09-29 13:22:51 UTC
Re: 201 Drivers and 42 Motors
Tim Goldstein
2000-09-30 07:09:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
ptengin@a...
2000-09-30 11:29:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 160-180V servo drivers
Jon Elson
2000-09-30 15:41:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko 160-180V servo drivers