CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Transformer question

Posted by Tom Caudle
on 2001-01-13 18:52:34 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, Jon Elson <jmelson@a...> wrote:
>
>
> JanRwl@A... wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 12-Jan-01 07:33:25 Central Standard Time,
> > jvicars@c... writes:
> >
> > > Do transformers work on a ratio of input to output, or are they
strictly for
> > > the rated voltages? In other words if I have a 240 to 120 step
down and I
> > > put 120 on the primaries will I get 60 V on the secondaries?
What are the
> > > practical limits to doing what I described? Thanks
> >

(snip)
> > Also, you can NOT try to put 240 V. into a winding rated for 120
V!!! That

>
> Actually, what will happen is the magnetic circuit will saturate,
and the primary
> Jon

Jon is correct. Transformers are designed based on a working flux
density. The core will saturate and current will become extremely
large if the flux density is too high. The material used (usually
steel laminations) will have a specified maximum flux density. The
formula for flux density is:
E X 10(8th)/4.44f X Np X Ae
where E is the applied voltage, f is the frequency of the input, Np
is the number of turns in the primary, and Ae is the core area in
square CM. What all this means is that if you change any of the
parameters you alter the flux density. You can get by with lowering
the top part of the equation or increasing the bottom part of the
equation without ill effects. Raise the top part (applied voltage)
or lower the bottom (primary turns, frequency or core area) and you
get saturation. While there is some margin built in there is not
enough to allow for more that about 10% change. The primary and
secondary currents are determined primarily by wire size.

Discussion Thread

Joe Vicars 2001-01-12 05:31:42 UTC Transformer question Jon Elson 2001-01-12 11:45:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question Dick Ganderton 2001-01-12 15:58:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question JanRwl@A... 2001-01-12 20:01:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question Ray 2001-01-12 20:12:38 UTC Re: Transformer question Jon Elson 2001-01-12 22:57:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question Jon Elson 2001-01-12 23:15:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question Roman Black 2001-01-13 09:06:54 UTC Re: Transformer question Hugh Prescott 2001-01-13 10:44:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Transformer question Tom Caudle 2001-01-13 18:52:34 UTC Re: Transformer question Tom 2001-10-29 15:18:18 UTC Transformer question JanRwl@A... 2001-10-29 19:31:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question Jon Elson 2001-10-29 21:31:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question Carol & Jerry Jankura 2001-10-30 05:55:58 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question Ray 2001-10-30 06:53:34 UTC Re: Transformer question tcsibor@v... 2001-10-30 11:27:32 UTC Re: Transformer question Andre' Blanchard 2001-10-30 14:26:15 UTC Re: Transformer question JanRwl@A... 2001-10-30 18:11:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Transformer question Ray 2001-10-31 12:47:16 UTC Re: Re: Re: Transformer question JJ 2002-10-01 16:12:47 UTC Transformer question mariss92705 2002-10-01 16:27:54 UTC Re: Transformer question JJ 2002-10-01 16:29:57 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Transformer question Raymond Heckert 2002-10-01 17:14:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-10-01 18:18:50 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question JJ 2002-10-02 16:15:18 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question eissej143 2002-10-26 22:49:20 UTC Re: Transformer question Tom Murray 2002-11-19 09:04:16 UTC Transformer question aussiedude 2002-11-19 09:36:53 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question turbulatordude 2002-11-19 19:14:42 UTC Re: Transformer question JanRwl@A... 2002-11-19 19:23:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Transformer question JanRwl@A... 2002-11-19 20:02:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question Raymond Heckert 2002-11-20 16:26:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer question