CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly!

Posted by Matthew King
on 2001-11-08 18:17:50 UTC
Let's be *quite* clear here - there's NOTHING in that catalog that is
"little profit" for them. They are WORSE than Grainger on some things as far
as price goes. YES - they have an excellent support reputation so that's
what you're paying for. A catalog is a DIRECT tax write off and is a cost of
doing business. Period. I may buy one 1/2 inch nut from them this year and a
CNC lathe next year, but without a catalog, I'll never know that they sell a
lathe, so they're off my potential supplier list. Not worth it to get up,
log on, search around and waste time on the web when a catalog, with an
index, will have me to that item in seconds.

They can keep their catalogs and I'll keep my business (which is growing
RAPIDLY) elsewhere.

Matt King
King Plantation
Columbus,GA
-----Original Message-----
From: dspinnett@... <dspinnett@...>
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:42 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly!


>This is not stupid. It is a huge catalog that surely costs a small
>fortune to keep updated.
>
>I used to buy from them every day, and their catalogs were jealously
>guarded at work...
>
>It is possible to get them, but you have to request under the name
>of a business, and do it during their yearly distrubution.
>
>They have no shortage of customers, and penny-ante sales is not
>where they make their money, nor is it worth their time to devote a
>disproportionate amount of time on customers who will cost a lot in
>terms of customer support, yet get little profit from it.
>
>Their service is first rate, easily the best of any business I dealt
>with over the 7 years that I used them as a supplier.
>
>Just use their internet catalog, and you will soon find they are a
>valuable resource.
>
>Dave.
>>
>> This is so stupid, it is beyond belief! It is amazing that large
>companies
>> have such insane management! The catalog can't cost more than $5
>> to print, and the mailing cost might be $2 (bound printed matter
>is a special
>> cheap mail class). Having somebody look up a product, photocopy
>the
>> page and then put the photocopy through the FAX machine has got to
>> cost $15 - $20 in manpower time! If you do this 2 - 5 times a
>year,
>> it is actually costing them SERIOUS money to deny you that catalog.
>>
>> Jon
>
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
>Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
>Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
>URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>bill,
>List Manager
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

Doug Harrison 2001-11-06 14:14:47 UTC [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] McMaster exposed CL 2001-11-06 15:12:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] McMaster exposed Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2001-11-06 15:42:45 UTC Re: McMaster exposed Chris L 2001-11-06 15:50:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Doug Harrison 2001-11-06 16:02:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] McMaster exposed Matthew King 2001-11-06 17:03:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed ballendo@y... 2001-11-06 17:22:59 UTC Re: McMaster exposed LEW BEST 2001-11-06 18:22:49 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed ccs@m... 2001-11-06 18:26:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Chris L 2001-11-06 19:47:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Jon Anderson 2001-11-06 20:50:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed LEW BEST 2001-11-06 21:03:23 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Chris L 2001-11-06 21:21:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Chris L 2001-11-06 21:25:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Darrell Daniels 2001-11-06 22:05:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Matthew King 2001-11-07 03:38:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Carol & Jerry Jankura 2001-11-07 05:38:45 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Eric Keller 2001-11-07 06:16:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed heemanshu B Shah 2001-11-07 06:27:19 UTC good new (may be) ccs@m... 2001-11-07 06:44:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed William Scalione 2001-11-07 16:30:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed LEW BEST 2001-11-07 17:15:36 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Matt Shaver 2001-11-07 17:46:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed LEW BEST 2001-11-07 18:37:12 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Jon Elson 2001-11-07 21:14:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed dspinnett@y... 2001-11-08 17:41:35 UTC Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Craig Chamberlin 2001-11-08 17:54:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! ballendo@y... 2001-11-08 17:57:56 UTC Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Jerry Kimberlin 2001-11-08 17:59:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! dspinnett@y... 2001-11-08 17:59:52 UTC Re McMaster comment... AND, Encoder suggestions? ccs@m... 2001-11-08 18:10:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Matthew King 2001-11-08 18:17:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Jerry Kimberlin 2001-11-08 18:20:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re McMaster comment... AND, Encoder suggestions? dspinnett@y... 2001-11-08 18:48:40 UTC Re: Encoder suggestions? dspinnett@y... 2001-11-08 19:01:05 UTC Re: McMaster exposed - my last .02 Jerry Kimberlin 2001-11-08 19:42:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - my last .02 Chris L 2001-11-08 19:59:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - my last .02 ccs@m... 2001-11-08 20:05:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - my last .02 Jerry Kimberlin 2001-11-08 20:33:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - my last .02 Jerry Kimberlin 2001-11-08 20:39:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - my last .02 Jon Elson 2001-11-08 22:56:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Matt Shaver 2001-11-09 05:11:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed Ray 2001-11-09 06:43:20 UTC Re: Re: Re: McMaster exposed - my last .02 William Scalione 2001-11-09 07:09:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Encoder suggestions? Scott 2001-11-09 07:16:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed CL 2001-11-09 07:18:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: McMaster exposed - my last .02 Graham Hollis 2001-11-09 09:39:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! ron ginger 2001-11-10 18:28:15 UTC Re:McMaster exposed ballendo@y... 2001-11-11 18:25:58 UTC Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! ballendo@y... 2001-11-11 23:24:54 UTC Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Graham Hollis 2001-11-12 00:12:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Tom Murray 2001-11-12 02:00:08 UTC Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Eric Keller 2001-11-12 02:03:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! ballendo@y... 2001-11-12 02:28:36 UTC Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Graham Hollis 2001-11-12 09:40:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly! Jon Anderson 2001-11-12 10:03:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: McMaster exposed - Hardly!