CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

RE: Survey Please read

on 2000-01-26 16:47:46 UTC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hansw [SMTP:hansw@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 4:38 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]Survey Please read
>
> From: hansw <hansw@...>
>
> Darrel,
>
> It's the Linux nightmare that upsets me... Software is not compatible
> across versions and someone can compile in a "thing" and blow up
> everything... I'm not a Linux hater, life is much to short for stupid
> stuff like hating anything, but I dislike wasting my time on something I
> know is not going to be standard and I can't plan for in the near
> future.
>
There is a very real possibility that Linux will be a standard of
the future. It is powerful like W98 and NT, yet retains the stability and
"programmer" friendliness of DOS. Linux is a programmer's OS and thus not
very end-user friendly. W98 and NT are end user oriented and as such are
not programmer friendly. Eventually, developers will come up with the cute
and fuzzy front end to make Linux tolerable to the masses. Then someone
will hide Linux within the front end and tell us it is not linux but an
entirely new OS (sound familiar?). It will then be as slow and unstable as
W98/NT.


> Windows(V2(not many people used V2, and 3.0) used to be like that, but
> since Windows NT4.0 it's been stable. I know it's not a real-time OS but
> it is real-time enough for CNC, just people don't bother to understand
> it well enough. Also the fact that the Printer port is not directly
> accessible scares off a lot of people. In truth the printer port driver
> code is simple and can be modified without much trouble at all. The
> Windows NT DDK is free.
>
The problem is not with getting access to the printer port. It is
the clock chip that we need access to, and no version of windows fully
allows this. Perhaps EMC would be less of a pain if it were written for
DOS, but then it would not be as popular. After all, who wants to be seen
dating fat girls or using DOS?

All cynical jokes aside, one should remember that EMC, like Linux,
is still experimental technology. If you like being on the cutting edge of
technology (and occasionally cutting yourself on it) then EMC/Linux is
fascinating. If you want simplicity then you should stick with Ahha or
CNCPro or some equivalent. Just remember that all of these programs have
bugs in them as well.

Doug Harrison


> regards
> Hans Wedemeyer
>
>
> Darrell wrote:
> >
> > From: "Darrell" <dgehlsen@...>
> >
> > Hans,
> > Sorry you had such a bad experience. I think the main trouble you had
> must
> > relate to following directions. When I followed the directions to the
> > letter, everything worked.
> > Darrell
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: hansw <hansw@...>
> > To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 8:32 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO]Survey Please read
> >
> > > From: hansw <hansw@...>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Enhanced Machine Controller Feedback Form
> > > >
> > > > ABSTRACT:
> > > > This study of the effects that the EMC program has made on your
> company
> > > > will be utilized for a project at Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
> We
> > are
> > > > currently researching the EMC program in Small to Medium sized
> > > > Manufacturers (SME). The results will be integrated in the final
> > > > effectiveness of EMC.
> > > >
> > > > INSTRUCTIONS:
> > > > Below are a few questions that will enable this study to get a
> better
> > > > understanding on how EMC has effected the production and
> effectiveness
> > of
> > > > your company. Answer the questions with a sentence, or a yes or no.
> In
> > the
> > > > remarks section feel free to add any other information that will
> help
> > this
> > > > study.
> > > >
> > > > Q1. How has EMC affected the overall production time and rate per
> > piece?
> > > > A1. ZERO
> > > >
> > > > Q2. What costs have been reduced from the implementation of EMC?
> > > > A2.
> > > >
> > > > Q3. Has the EMC program reduced any jobs that were prior needed for
> the
> > > > task that EMC is now doing?
> > > > A3. NO
> > > >
> > > > Q4. With the introduction to EMC would you now upgrade to a more in
> > depth
> > > > CAM package?
> > > > A4. YES
> > > >
> > > > Q5. How difficult was it for you to find out about and obtain EMC?
> > Would
> > > > there have been a better way?
> > > > A5. VERY
> > > >
> > > > Q6. How difficult was the setup/retrofit of your equipment? Could
> you
> > > > think of some better way of doing this?
> > > > A6. Nightmare, Linux is a mess I simply gave up and found something
> else
> > > >
> > > > Q7. What are the best and worst experiences that you've had
> throughout
> > > > the whole process of finding and installing EMC?
> > > > A7. ZERO ZERO ZERO O moved to CNCPro it works.
> > > >
> > > > Q8. What was the cost of the implementation?
> > > > A8. TIME and I can;t afford time..
> > > >
> > > > Q9. How long did the overall implementation take?
> > > > A9. Tried for a day and then found it was much to much of a
> nightmare .
> > Linux never worked.
> > > >
> > > > Q10. What kind of machine/brand/model/controller/motors were
> converted?
> > > > A10. n/a
> > > >
> > > > Q11. Any further remarks that will help this study appreciate the
> > > > effectiveness of the EMC program?
> > > > A11. Move to Windows NT2000 and thing will become more real. Linux
> is
> > the nightmare that will destroy EMC
> > > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor
> ----------------------------
> > >
> > > Save 50 percent at MotherNature.com. See site for details
> > > <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/MotherNature ">Click Here</a>
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
> > discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
> > > To Unsubscribe, read archives, change to or from digest.
> > > Go to: http://www.onelist.com/isregistered.cgi
> > > Log on, and you will go to Member Center, and you can make changes
> there.
> > > For the FAQ, go to http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > > bill,
> > > List Manager
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
> >
> > $20 OFF PURCHASES FOR YOUR CAT AT PETOPIA.COM!
> > Treat your cat to $20 off all the food, toys & treats your cat desires
> > when you purchase $30 or more! Hurry! Offer expires soon!
> > <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/Petopia102 ">Click Here</a>
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
> discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
> > To Unsubscribe, read archives, change to or from digest.
> > Go to: http://www.onelist.com/isregistered.cgi
> > Log on, and you will go to Member Center, and you can make changes
> there.
> > For the FAQ, go to http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > bill,
> > List Manager
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> $20 OFF PURCHASES FOR YOUR PET AT PETOPIA.COM!
> The Internet Pet Paradise has everything you need to keep your pet happy
> & healthy! Shop now to receive $20 off purchases of $30 or more!
> <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/Petopia116 ">Click Here</a>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
> discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
> To Unsubscribe, read archives, change to or from digest.
> Go to: http://www.onelist.com/isregistered.cgi
> Log on, and you will go to Member Center, and you can make changes there.
> For the FAQ, go to http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager

Discussion Thread

hansw 2000-01-26 08:32:51 UTC Re: Survey Please read Darrell 2000-01-26 13:04:43 UTC Re: Survey Please read hansw 2000-01-26 13:37:55 UTC Re: Survey Please read Harrison, Doug 2000-01-26 16:47:46 UTC RE: Survey Please read Steve Carlisle 2000-01-26 18:09:25 UTC Re: Survey Please read Steve Carlisle 2000-01-26 18:12:58 UTC Re: Survey Please read Marshall Pharoah 2000-01-26 16:54:45 UTC Re: Survey Please read Ted Robbins 2000-01-26 17:36:17 UTC Re: Survey Please read Ted Robbins 2000-01-26 17:45:08 UTC Re: Survey Please read hansw 2000-01-26 19:05:31 UTC Re: Survey Please read Karl Klemm 2000-01-26 19:16:20 UTC Re: Survey Please read Steve Carlisle 2000-01-26 19:53:15 UTC Re: Survey Please read Ian Wright 2000-01-27 07:15:02 UTC Re: Survey Please read hansw 2000-01-27 09:40:26 UTC Re: Survey Please read hansw 2000-01-27 09:59:55 UTC Re: Survey Please read Marshall Pharoah 2000-01-27 12:14:45 UTC Re: Survey Please read paul@A... 2000-01-27 12:14:45 UTC Re: Survey Please read hansw 2000-01-27 12:33:01 UTC Re: Survey Please read paul@A... 2000-01-27 12:33:01 UTC Re: Survey Please read Marshall Pharoah 2000-01-27 12:49:06 UTC Re: Survey Please read hansw 2000-01-27 13:03:27 UTC Re: Survey Please read Marshall Pharoah 2000-01-27 18:13:23 UTC Re: Survey Please read hansw 2000-01-27 18:50:04 UTC Re: Survey Please read Karl Klemm 2000-01-27 18:53:43 UTC Re: Survey Please read Ward M. 2000-01-27 20:09:32 UTC Re: Survey Please read Jon Elson 2000-01-27 22:49:01 UTC Re: Survey Please read hansw 2000-01-27 23:12:20 UTC Re: Survey Please read Craig C Chamberlin 2000-01-27 23:39:24 UTC Re: Survey Please read Ian Wright 2000-01-27 15:02:21 UTC Re: Survey Please read hansw 2000-01-28 06:53:50 UTC Re: Survey Please read Ron Ginger 2000-01-30 18:21:43 UTC Re: Re: Survey Please read Matt Shaver 2000-01-31 00:45:09 UTC Re: Survey Please read