G201-IP
Posted by
mariss92705
on 2002-11-23 13:41:41 UTC
Hi,
I have breadboarded a protection circuit for the G201. It protects
against:
1) Shorting any or all motor wires to ground.
2) Shorting any motor phase to phase.
3) Miss-phased motors (series or parallel).
4) Miss-connected motors.
5) Internal motor winding shorts (serial-killer motors).
6) Motor connects/disconnects while under power.
7) Motor winding short to motor case.
8) Unused 6-wire motor leads touching/shorting anywhere.
These are the most common drive failure problems (>95%) that we see
for return/repair.
The circuit works internally on the "DISABLE" input (term. #7) of the
drive. Any of these faults would latch it low (disable). It would
then require a recycling of the power supply to clear the fault.
The "Fault" indication would be a "0" on the "DISABLE" terminal.
The "IP" in G201-IP stands for "current protect", or as a cruel
individual here pointed out, it can also read "Idiot Protect".
This circuit (about 20 additional components to the existing 136)
would require a major revision (REV-8). Of course it would be 100%
compatible, pinout, function and form, with all previous drives.
What I am throwing out to the group here is:
(1) Is it worth the effort to do this?
(2) Is it worth a $15 premium to do have this protection? That is the
all-up cost of the additional parts.
We will continue to produce the G201 regardless if there is or is not
a G201-IP. It will not in any way supplant it.
The G201-IP might be useful for those that are using the drive for
the first time and want a little extra margin against Mr. Murphy and
his Law. Later, after everything has settled out, stock G201s would
serve as well. Others that are a little more tense/prudent may wish
to have it as protection against Mr. Murphy should he call uninvited
at a later time.
If I'm going to do this, my schedule has it for the end of the first
quarter. What I'm looking for is feedback if this is wanted/needed.
Thanks.
Mariss
I have breadboarded a protection circuit for the G201. It protects
against:
1) Shorting any or all motor wires to ground.
2) Shorting any motor phase to phase.
3) Miss-phased motors (series or parallel).
4) Miss-connected motors.
5) Internal motor winding shorts (serial-killer motors).
6) Motor connects/disconnects while under power.
7) Motor winding short to motor case.
8) Unused 6-wire motor leads touching/shorting anywhere.
These are the most common drive failure problems (>95%) that we see
for return/repair.
The circuit works internally on the "DISABLE" input (term. #7) of the
drive. Any of these faults would latch it low (disable). It would
then require a recycling of the power supply to clear the fault.
The "Fault" indication would be a "0" on the "DISABLE" terminal.
The "IP" in G201-IP stands for "current protect", or as a cruel
individual here pointed out, it can also read "Idiot Protect".
This circuit (about 20 additional components to the existing 136)
would require a major revision (REV-8). Of course it would be 100%
compatible, pinout, function and form, with all previous drives.
What I am throwing out to the group here is:
(1) Is it worth the effort to do this?
(2) Is it worth a $15 premium to do have this protection? That is the
all-up cost of the additional parts.
We will continue to produce the G201 regardless if there is or is not
a G201-IP. It will not in any way supplant it.
The G201-IP might be useful for those that are using the drive for
the first time and want a little extra margin against Mr. Murphy and
his Law. Later, after everything has settled out, stock G201s would
serve as well. Others that are a little more tense/prudent may wish
to have it as protection against Mr. Murphy should he call uninvited
at a later time.
If I'm going to do this, my schedule has it for the end of the first
quarter. What I'm looking for is feedback if this is wanted/needed.
Thanks.
Mariss
Discussion Thread
mariss92705
2002-11-23 13:41:41 UTC
G201-IP
Jim Brown
2002-11-23 14:38:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Keith Bowers
2002-11-23 14:47:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-23 15:16:28 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Kory Hamzeh
2002-11-23 15:34:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
James Cullins
2002-11-23 16:10:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-23 16:39:34 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Ron Kline
2002-11-23 18:55:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Peter
2002-11-23 19:15:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
kdoney_63021
2002-11-23 20:14:53 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-23 22:02:41 UTC
Re: G201-IP
deanc500
2002-11-23 23:24:17 UTC
Re: G201-IP
galt1x
2002-11-24 03:25:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Thomas E. Jones
2002-11-24 10:00:20 UTC
Re: G201-IP
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-24 12:37:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-24 12:46:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
John Johnson
2002-11-24 13:50:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-11-24 14:43:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:01:56 UTC
Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:03:58 UTC
Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:06:17 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-24 22:51:31 UTC
Re: G201-IP
jmkasunich
2002-11-25 06:39:20 UTC
Re: G201-IP
jmkasunich
2002-11-25 07:02:22 UTC
Re: G201-IP
n4onl
2002-11-25 08:02:51 UTC
Re: G201-IP
pt_green
2002-11-25 21:58:41 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mayfieldtm
2002-11-26 12:58:24 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-26 17:46:31 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Marv Frankel
2002-11-26 18:21:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Jon Elson
2002-11-26 23:42:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Nicolas Benezan
2002-11-27 02:39:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP