RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Posted by
Carol & Jerry Jankura
on 2002-11-24 14:43:10 UTC
Interesting, as I'd take the tack of adding $15 per axis to my quote and
furnishing the protected drivers. Just before I retired, I was involved in a
similar situation (not using Gecko products) where my vendor made a simple
mistake that fried a $100 component (The project was costing us somewhere in
the high five figures). That mistake cost our vendor an extra week's time,
additional trips between Arizona (his base) and Ohio which would have more
than covered the $15.00 per axis that he'd have gladly spent had the option
been available to him.
The point - Mariss, I think that your IP type boards have a place and should
sell if marketed properly.
|P.S. to my last: I would opt for the G201/210 "AS-IS", rather than pay an
|additional $15 for "same thing plus protection". I would simply be VERY
|careful in the future, and SAVE the $$$!!!
furnishing the protected drivers. Just before I retired, I was involved in a
similar situation (not using Gecko products) where my vendor made a simple
mistake that fried a $100 component (The project was costing us somewhere in
the high five figures). That mistake cost our vendor an extra week's time,
additional trips between Arizona (his base) and Ohio which would have more
than covered the $15.00 per axis that he'd have gladly spent had the option
been available to him.
The point - Mariss, I think that your IP type boards have a place and should
sell if marketed properly.
|P.S. to my last: I would opt for the G201/210 "AS-IS", rather than pay an
|additional $15 for "same thing plus protection". I would simply be VERY
|careful in the future, and SAVE the $$$!!!
Discussion Thread
mariss92705
2002-11-23 13:41:41 UTC
G201-IP
Jim Brown
2002-11-23 14:38:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Keith Bowers
2002-11-23 14:47:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-23 15:16:28 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Kory Hamzeh
2002-11-23 15:34:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
James Cullins
2002-11-23 16:10:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-23 16:39:34 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Ron Kline
2002-11-23 18:55:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Peter
2002-11-23 19:15:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
kdoney_63021
2002-11-23 20:14:53 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-23 22:02:41 UTC
Re: G201-IP
deanc500
2002-11-23 23:24:17 UTC
Re: G201-IP
galt1x
2002-11-24 03:25:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Thomas E. Jones
2002-11-24 10:00:20 UTC
Re: G201-IP
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-24 12:37:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-24 12:46:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
John Johnson
2002-11-24 13:50:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-11-24 14:43:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:01:56 UTC
Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:03:58 UTC
Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:06:17 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-24 22:51:31 UTC
Re: G201-IP
jmkasunich
2002-11-25 06:39:20 UTC
Re: G201-IP
jmkasunich
2002-11-25 07:02:22 UTC
Re: G201-IP
n4onl
2002-11-25 08:02:51 UTC
Re: G201-IP
pt_green
2002-11-25 21:58:41 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mayfieldtm
2002-11-26 12:58:24 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-26 17:46:31 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Marv Frankel
2002-11-26 18:21:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Jon Elson
2002-11-26 23:42:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Nicolas Benezan
2002-11-27 02:39:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP