Re: G201-IP
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2002-11-23 16:39:34 UTC
I am one who suffered catastrophic damage from some sort of failure.
The 201a actually blew up, no really, parts were found in the bottom
of the case.
Before I would spend $60.00 on 4 drives, I would considder my
options, and may just flip a coin on the chances of making a mistake.
What I would probably do if I wanted to get more units would be to
get one IP unit and use that to test each circuit as I installed
them.
I would like to have a lower price option and the IP unit.
Savings? $45.00 in pocket.
Extra work? add $100.00
Peace of mind ? Priceless !
Dave
The 201a actually blew up, no really, parts were found in the bottom
of the case.
Before I would spend $60.00 on 4 drives, I would considder my
options, and may just flip a coin on the chances of making a mistake.
What I would probably do if I wanted to get more units would be to
get one IP unit and use that to test each circuit as I installed
them.
I would like to have a lower price option and the IP unit.
Savings? $45.00 in pocket.
Extra work? add $100.00
Peace of mind ? Priceless !
Dave
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "James Cullins" <jcullins@c...> wrote:
> I agree.
> Jim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Brown" <jagco1998@y...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...>
> Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 4:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
>
>
> >
> > I think that a user of any of your fine products would want such
a safety
> net, either new or experienced.
> > I know that I would gladly pay the extra $15 for each drive,for
this extra
> feature, as Im sure that many, many other people would too.
> > You should instill this protection in all of your products,as I
cant see
> how anyone wouldnt want it. Everyone makes a "boo-boo" now and
then, and it
> sure would save some money in the long run if you purchased a drive
with
> this idiot proof solution.
> > Mariss, I say go for it and up the price of the drive to
compensate for
> the extra components. Everyone knows that what they get when they
purchase a
> Geckodrive is far worth more than the asking price anyway.
> > There is just not a better solution for a low cost-high quality
DIY motor
> drive anywhere in the world than a GeckoDrive product, bar none!
> > Regards,
> > Jim
> > mariss92705 <mariss92705@y...> wrote:Hi,
> >
> > I have breadboarded a protection circuit for the G201. It protects
> > against:
> >
> > 1) Shorting any or all motor wires to ground.
> > 2) Shorting any motor phase to phase.
> > 3) Miss-phased motors (series or parallel).
> > 4) Miss-connected motors.
> > 5) Internal motor winding shorts (serial-killer motors).
> > 6) Motor connects/disconnects while under power.
> > 7) Motor winding short to motor case.
> > 8) Unused 6-wire motor leads touching/shorting anywhere.
> >
> > These are the most common drive failure problems (>95%) that we
see
> > for return/repair.
> >
> > The circuit works internally on the "DISABLE" input (term. #7) of
the
> > drive. Any of these faults would latch it low (disable). It would
> > then require a recycling of the power supply to clear the fault.
> > The "Fault" indication would be a "0" on the "DISABLE" terminal.
> >
> > The "IP" in G201-IP stands for "current protect", or as a cruel
> > individual here pointed out, it can also read "Idiot Protect".
> >
> > This circuit (about 20 additional components to the existing 136)
> > would require a major revision (REV-8). Of course it would be 100%
> > compatible, pinout, function and form, with all previous drives.
> >
> > What I am throwing out to the group here is:
> >
> > (1) Is it worth the effort to do this?
> > (2) Is it worth a $15 premium to do have this protection? That is
the
> > all-up cost of the additional parts.
> >
> > We will continue to produce the G201 regardless if there is or is
not
> > a G201-IP. It will not in any way supplant it.
> >
> > The G201-IP might be useful for those that are using the drive for
> > the first time and want a little extra margin against Mr. Murphy
and
> > his Law. Later, after everything has settled out, stock G201s
would
> > serve as well. Others that are a little more tense/prudent may
wish
> > to have it as protection against Mr. Murphy should he call
uninvited
> > at a later time.
> >
> > If I'm going to do this, my schedule has it for the end of the
first
> > quarter. What I'm looking for is feedback if this is
wanted/needed.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Mariss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> > Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if
> you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to
be a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
POSTING THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> > Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if
> you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
to be a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
POSTING THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
Discussion Thread
mariss92705
2002-11-23 13:41:41 UTC
G201-IP
Jim Brown
2002-11-23 14:38:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Keith Bowers
2002-11-23 14:47:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-23 15:16:28 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Kory Hamzeh
2002-11-23 15:34:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
James Cullins
2002-11-23 16:10:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-23 16:39:34 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Ron Kline
2002-11-23 18:55:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Peter
2002-11-23 19:15:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
kdoney_63021
2002-11-23 20:14:53 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Tony Jeffree
2002-11-23 22:02:41 UTC
Re: G201-IP
deanc500
2002-11-23 23:24:17 UTC
Re: G201-IP
galt1x
2002-11-24 03:25:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
Thomas E. Jones
2002-11-24 10:00:20 UTC
Re: G201-IP
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-24 12:37:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-24 12:46:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
John Johnson
2002-11-24 13:50:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-11-24 14:43:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:01:56 UTC
Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:03:58 UTC
Re: G201-IP
turbulatordude
2002-11-24 20:06:17 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-24 22:51:31 UTC
Re: G201-IP
jmkasunich
2002-11-25 06:39:20 UTC
Re: G201-IP
jmkasunich
2002-11-25 07:02:22 UTC
Re: G201-IP
n4onl
2002-11-25 08:02:51 UTC
Re: G201-IP
pt_green
2002-11-25 21:58:41 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mayfieldtm
2002-11-26 12:58:24 UTC
Re: G201-IP
mariss92705
2002-11-26 17:46:31 UTC
Re: G201-IP
Marv Frankel
2002-11-26 18:21:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Jon Elson
2002-11-26 23:42:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP
Nicolas Benezan
2002-11-27 02:39:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP