CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: G201-IP

Posted by mariss92705
on 2002-11-23 15:16:28 UTC
Jim,

Thanks for the kind words.

My "philosophy" had been to make no-frills drives where every penny
was spent on performance (which you get every time the drive is on)
versus circuitry that only comes into play once in a drive's lifetime
(a wiring error or a serial-killer motor). In the latter case there
are transistors, comparators, etc. that never ever get used in most
drives. Still, they are along for the ride, cost money and do nothing
unless something goes very, very wrong.

I still feel that way, so the G201 will still continue to be built;
all new ones will add to the 40,000 plus out there right now.
The "IP" version will maybe keep a few from coming back worse for the
wear.

Mariss


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Jim Brown <jagco1998@y...> wrote:
>
> I think that a user of any of your fine products would want such a
safety net, either new or experienced.
> I know that I would gladly pay the extra $15 for each drive,for
this extra feature, as Im sure that many, many other people would too.
> You should instill this protection in all of your products,as I
cant see how anyone wouldnt want it. Everyone makes a "boo-boo" now
and then, and it sure would save some money in the long run if you
purchased a drive with this idiot proof solution.
> Mariss, I say go for it and up the price of the drive to compensate
for the extra components. Everyone knows that what they get when they
purchase a Geckodrive is far worth more than the asking price anyway.
> There is just not a better solution for a low cost-high quality DIY
motor drive anywhere in the world than a GeckoDrive product, bar none!
> Regards,
> Jim

Discussion Thread

mariss92705 2002-11-23 13:41:41 UTC G201-IP Jim Brown 2002-11-23 14:38:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP Keith Bowers 2002-11-23 14:47:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP mariss92705 2002-11-23 15:16:28 UTC Re: G201-IP Kory Hamzeh 2002-11-23 15:34:13 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP James Cullins 2002-11-23 16:10:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP turbulatordude 2002-11-23 16:39:34 UTC Re: G201-IP Ron Kline 2002-11-23 18:55:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP Peter 2002-11-23 19:15:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP kdoney_63021 2002-11-23 20:14:53 UTC Re: G201-IP Tony Jeffree 2002-11-23 22:02:41 UTC Re: G201-IP deanc500 2002-11-23 23:24:17 UTC Re: G201-IP galt1x 2002-11-24 03:25:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP Thomas E. Jones 2002-11-24 10:00:20 UTC Re: G201-IP JanRwl@A... 2002-11-24 12:37:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP JanRwl@A... 2002-11-24 12:46:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP John Johnson 2002-11-24 13:50:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-11-24 14:43:10 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP turbulatordude 2002-11-24 20:01:56 UTC Re: G201-IP turbulatordude 2002-11-24 20:03:58 UTC Re: G201-IP turbulatordude 2002-11-24 20:06:17 UTC Re: G201-IP mariss92705 2002-11-24 22:51:31 UTC Re: G201-IP jmkasunich 2002-11-25 06:39:20 UTC Re: G201-IP jmkasunich 2002-11-25 07:02:22 UTC Re: G201-IP n4onl 2002-11-25 08:02:51 UTC Re: G201-IP pt_green 2002-11-25 21:58:41 UTC Re: G201-IP mayfieldtm 2002-11-26 12:58:24 UTC Re: G201-IP mariss92705 2002-11-26 17:46:31 UTC Re: G201-IP Marv Frankel 2002-11-26 18:21:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP Jon Elson 2002-11-26 23:42:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G201-IP Nicolas Benezan 2002-11-27 02:39:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G201-IP